W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63

For all of you new guys that want to go fast!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 01:45 PM
  #51  
e55amgrocket's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 7
From: Northern Va
Dirt Scooters
Originally Posted by Max.H
Good stuff, Do you mind sharing what you did differently to get like 70+ or - whp more then everyone else with previously mentioned power mods?
Just a well put together package. The heads I used were N/A heads so that might of helped a little. Instead on looking for crazy CFM numbers we capitalized on the lift that the cams had (.473) and made the heads flow very well for the low lift cams we have. I learned that for whatever reason my car loved to run really rich on the Q16 and that picked up a decent amount by itself. The other thing we focused on was keeping the IAT's as cold as possible for each pass. I would drop .3 on my 3rd pass just because the 20lbs of ice would be melted and the water would be like warm by then.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 05:03 PM
  #52  
Hammer Down's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 28
From: Bay Area
2015 E63S, 2018 E63S
Originally Posted by Hotsauce55
Agreed, we need stratification based on MPH or ET (whatever)

12.0 - 12.5
11.5 - 12.0
11.0 - 11.5

etc..

Then users can list in their combos. It will give everyone an easy way of gauging approximately what they need to achieve their ET goals.
Ok well leave your car stock, add drag radials and you could run 11.7 with no modifications except drag radials.

You see how crazy that sounds.... If you want to go sorta fast add Kleemann mid headers, a 168-175 crankshaft pulley, split the cooling and add a tank up front for extra cooling capacity, a set of k&n filters and a really good road tune or atleast a dyno tune. That setup should be good for 11.3-11.6 @121-123 depending on driver, track prep, and DA
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 05:17 PM
  #53  
Hammer Down's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 28
From: Bay Area
2015 E63S, 2018 E63S
Originally Posted by BagMan
Last car I had at the track was a fox body mustang trapping at 100mph. Trap speed only varied by a couple MPH, like 98-100. Higher if I spun. Lower if it hooked.

What kind of variance do you see at 130mph?
The numbers that we achieved may not be the numbers you achieve with same mods. All cars on the list trap between 127-133. All different setups, lightweight wheels & breaks, no interior with racing seat, no rear exhaust, just drag radials only, lightweight battery, 180lb driver to 250lb+ driver
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 05:33 PM
  #54  
Hammer Down's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 28
From: Bay Area
2015 E63S, 2018 E63S
Originally Posted by SilverStrk
Anything above 130 is Moving.. If you trapped 133 See my list of mods and even though I don't 1/4 mile her I know she would run in the 10's if I don't blow it This is a very good thread to help guys achieve speed in similar but different ways..
The only way to find out if your car will run 10's is to run it. When my buddy got out of my car when I took him for a ride after i modded it he said man that really surprised me, I'm impressed. I then said yeah it's a 10sec car and he said have you run 10 seconds yet? I said no not yet he replied, well then it's not a 10 sec car until you run it. My setup is really similar to Hulk's and he ran 11.1
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 05:38 PM
  #55  
Max.H's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,681
Likes: 39
From: San Diego
E55
Originally Posted by e55amgrocket
Just a well put together package. The heads I used were N/A heads so that might of helped a little. Instead on looking for crazy CFM numbers we capitalized on the lift that the cams had (.473) and made the heads flow very well for the low lift cams we have. I learned that for whatever reason my car loved to run really rich on the Q16 and that picked up a decent amount by itself. The other thing we focused on was keeping the IAT's as cold as possible for each pass. I would drop .3 on my 3rd pass just because the 20lbs of ice would be melted and the water would be like warm by then.

Why could the NA heads have helped? Maybe a smaller quench in the combustion chamber for higher compression and or milling of the heads is my guess.

Nice work on the optimizing your airflow for the stock cam lift. The fuel thing sounds good too. C16 sounds like overkill for our motors, especially with stock internals. MS109 sounds good though.

All makes perfect sense. Icing down the supercharger and keeping your trunk tank ice cold has always been one of the main keys for our cars to run the lowest numbers at the track.

Maybe some weight reduction wouldn't hurt either. Thanks for sharing!
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 05:48 PM
  #56  
Hulk's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 102
From: Florida
A Merc
Originally Posted by Hammer Down
The only way to find out if your car will run 10's is to run it. When my buddy got out of my car when I took him for a ride after i modded it he said man that really surprised me, I'm impressed. I then said yeah it's a 10sec car and he said have you run 10 seconds yet? I said no not yet he replied, well then it's not a 10 sec car until you run it. My setup is really similar to Hulk's and he ran 11.1
Your buddy is a real assh0le lol, no but seriously, like you said many factors can come into play with times and mph, so just because you have someone's exact setup doesn't mean you will run the same
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 05:50 PM
  #57  
Hulk's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 102
From: Florida
A Merc
I have never tried Q16, I just don't like leaded fuel. That's my opinion, look at lowpro he ran with MS109 and did very well.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 06:57 PM
  #58  
Hotsauce55's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 609
Likes: 19
From: Ontario
2005 E55
Originally Posted by Hammer Down
Ok well leave your car stock, add drag radials and you could run 11.7 with no modifications except drag radials.

You see how crazy that sounds.... If you want to go sorta fast add Kleemann mid headers, a 168-175 crankshaft pulley, split the cooling and add a tank up front for extra cooling capacity, a set of k&n filters and a really good road tune or atleast a dyno tune. That setup should be good for 11.3-11.6 @121-123 depending on driver, track prep, and DA
I hear you but your missing the point of the recommendation. Its to give people a general idea of what it takes to run in those time brackets. Its not an exact science and will never cover off every combo, track variable or driver variable etc... It would also put a stop to a number of basic performance questions that everyone new to the platform has. Your thoughts on what it takes for 11.3 to 11.6 is perfect for reference of roughly what it takes! Again just a general gauge for folks, wont cover off every variable or environment.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 06:58 PM
  #59  
Hammer Down's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 28
From: Bay Area
2015 E63S, 2018 E63S
Originally Posted by Hulk
Your buddy is a real assh0le lol, no but seriously, like you said many factors can come into play with times and mph, so just because you have someone's exact setup doesn't mean you will run the same
I know right? He's old school big block chevy guy but he was right and the pressure was on me.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 07:26 PM
  #60  
99lightning's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 26
From: new ringgold pa
99 ford lightning
stock pulley
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 08:48 PM
  #61  
e55amgrocket's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 7
From: Northern Va
Dirt Scooters
Originally Posted by Max.H
Why could the NA heads have helped? Maybe a smaller quench in the combustion chamber for higher compression and or milling of the heads is my guess.

Nice work on the optimizing your airflow for the stock cam lift. The fuel thing sounds good too. C16 sounds like overkill for our motors, especially with stock internals. MS109 sounds good though.

All makes perfect sense. Icing down the supercharger and keeping your trunk tank ice cold has always been one of the main keys for our cars to run the lowest numbers at the track.

Maybe some weight reduction wouldn't hurt either. Thanks for sharing!
The N/A heads were only decked for flatness so we didn't really change the CC's of the chamber. The chambers are the same in both heads. The N/A head doesn't have the hump in the intake and my porter tested both and said hands down the N/A head was better for what I was trying to do. The exhaust port is also a tiny bit different where the EGR ports are. I went with Q16 for safety and it has 10% oxygen compared to MS109's 9%. As long as you can keep IAT's down q16 is great. There was a lot of other little things I did to the car but I can't let all my secrets out
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 09:41 PM
  #62  
RedBullJnky's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,921
Likes: 9
From: Streets of SoFlo
you to Hate
Originally Posted by e55amgrocket
The N/A heads were only decked for flatness so we didn't really change the CC's of the chamber. The chambers are the same in both heads. The N/A head doesn't have the hump in the intake and my porter tested both and said hands down the N/A head was better for what I was trying to do. The exhaust port is also a tiny bit different where the EGR ports are. I went with Q16 for safety and it has 10% oxygen compared to MS109's 9%. As long as you can keep IAT's down q16 is great. There was a lot of other little things I did to the car but I can't let all my secrets out
How much you want for that built motor Chris has waiting for you?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2015 | 12:45 AM
  #63  
dllhg's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 228
From: Norther CA
2014 cls63 a amg. 2018 AMG GTR
I copied Hammerdown's mods more or less. Only thing I see missing is Killer Chiller and or Methonal. For daily driving you cant beat them on these cars or any FI car for that matter. Nothing worse than losing 50+ WHP from a heat soaked car. also I'll add it seems looped rails are not needed nor do they even help on these cars. Doesn't RBJ still run stock rails even with all the power he is putting down ? I opted not to installed them after many very reputable and very fast members told me not to bother. Two years and 20K miles later beating the crap out of her seems to prove they were right.

Last edited by dllhg; Apr 10, 2015 at 12:48 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2015 | 12:55 AM
  #64  
Max.H's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,681
Likes: 39
From: San Diego
E55
Originally Posted by e55amgrocket
The N/A heads were only decked for flatness so we didn't really change the CC's of the chamber. The chambers are the same in both heads. The N/A head doesn't have the hump in the intake and my porter tested both and said hands down the N/A head was better for what I was trying to do. The exhaust port is also a tiny bit different where the EGR ports are. I went with Q16 for safety and it has 10% oxygen compared to MS109's 9%. As long as you can keep IAT's down q16 is great. There was a lot of other little things I did to the car but I can't let all my secrets out
Nice, if opportunity arrises I would definitely raise compression. I understand where you are coming from. Oddly I thought some lighter fuels had more oxygenation. True indeed, A lot of a little adds up. Little debarring here. Little smoothening there. Little weight reduction here little there. LoL

Hey you are a good sport! 10.5 is solid.

Whats up with your GT500??? I demand to see pics of that beast!!
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2015 | 06:22 PM
  #65  
LOLLSX's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Utah, USA
2005 MB E55 AMG
Originally Posted by Hammer Down
Number's don't mean squat as there are plenty of factors that go into achieving numbers. Personally I couldn't tell you what my numbers are because I never dyno'd the car. All of the cars can be driven daily and they pretty much produce the same amount of power (E55rocket) may be pushing a few more ponies but the mods listed (if you want numbers) will produce between 500-575rwhp & 600-700ftlbs again that won't mean much as Bassn07 dyno'd at 447rwhp and ran 10.7@131 which is another reason why there aren't any numbers with each mod list. The point of the list is to help the new guys out by giving them the formula to go fast.

I know numbers don't mean anything. My stock 55k has ran c63 507 and a s65. Both make more power. Both should beat me and do so on paper. Both saw tail lights the entire time. But number help judge what mods to do for what power and where to start. I like to know what other people have gotten out of something before I pay for it. If that makes sense
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2015 | 11:57 PM
  #66  
Hammer Down's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 28
From: Bay Area
2015 E63S, 2018 E63S
Originally Posted by LOLLSX
I know numbers don't mean anything. My stock 55k has ran c63 507 and a s65. Both make more power. Both should beat me and do so on paper. Both saw tail lights the entire time. But number help judge what mods to do for what power and where to start. I like to know what other people have gotten out of something before I pay for it. If that makes sense
What's your goal?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2015 | 05:03 AM
  #67  
e500slr's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,214
Likes: 29
2011 E63, 2013 CLS63
Originally Posted by Hammer Down
So that would put you in the 700hp+ (Crank) range
That's 760 crank HP. E55s lose 18% through the drivetrain.

By the way are headers absolutely necessary for 10s?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2015 | 06:42 AM
  #68  
Hulk's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 102
From: Florida
A Merc
I got to 11.1 with modded stock manifolds
I think with a better 60' it would have been 10s however with completely stock manifolds I don't think it's possible.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2015 | 10:40 AM
  #69  
LOLLSX's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Utah, USA
2005 MB E55 AMG
My goal is 600-650hp on motor. But then again power aside I would be happy with low to mid 11's on the motor. I will add some spray to dip into the 10's but that wont be for a while.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2015 | 10:48 AM
  #70  
BC928's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 80
From: SoCal
2006 E55, Various other German and ‘Murican
What is this hump in the intake port for?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2015 | 09:07 PM
  #71  
Hammer Down's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 28
From: Bay Area
2015 E63S, 2018 E63S
Originally Posted by LOLLSX
My goal is 600-650hp on motor. But then again power aside I would be happy with low to mid 11's on the motor. I will add some spray to dip into the 10's but that wont be for a while.
You can add Kleemann mid headers, a 168-175 crankshaft pulley, split the cooling and add a tank up front for extra cooling capacity, a set of k&n filters and a really good road tune or atleast a dyno tune. That setup should be good for 11.3-11.6 @121-123 depending on driver, track prep, and DA if you want to go faster you will have to upgrade to a 82mm TB, upgrade your injectors and increase your crankshaft pulley size and retune
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2015 | 01:00 AM
  #72  
rawdvm's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 60
Likes: 3
From: Dallas, TX
'04 E55 AMG
This is my list of mods:

EC 84mmS/C pulley
Belt-wrap kit & ASP pulleys
EC 550cc injectors (stock fuel rail)
EC 82mm TB
EC Heat Exchanger
NGK LFR7AIX plugs
AFE Pro Dry S filters
Wrapped, custom mid-length headers , no cats, x-pipe, no resonator (stock mufflers for now - looking at electric cut-outs & other mufflers)
EC Ported/polished heads (stock cams)
Weistec 170mm Modular CP
EC trunk tank (Dad's)
EC built transmission, 3K converter & TCU tune
Quaife LSD
EC dyno tune
548whp/610wtq (93 octane) on Jerry's new DynoJet 424XLC2 with the linx system (front & rear rollers linked together)

She is my daily driver. I haven't tracked her, yet, so, I don't have times to compare with the others here. But, she's strong.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2015 | 02:55 AM
  #73  
e500slr's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,214
Likes: 29
2011 E63, 2013 CLS63
Originally Posted by rawdvm
This is my list of mods:

EC 84mmS/C pulley
Belt-wrap kit & ASP pulleys
EC 550cc injectors (stock fuel rail)
EC 82mm TB
EC Heat Exchanger
NGK LFR7AIX plugs
AFE Pro Dry S filters
Wrapped, custom mid-length headers , no cats, x-pipe, no resonator (stock mufflers for now - looking at electric cut-outs & other mufflers)
EC Ported/polished heads (stock cams)
Weistec 170mm Modular CP
EC trunk tank (Dad's)
EC built transmission, 3K converter & TCU tune
Quaife LSD
EC dyno tune
548whp/610wtq (93 octane) on Jerry's new DynoJet 424XLC2 with the linx system (front & rear rollers linked together)

She is my daily driver. I haven't tracked her, yet, so, I don't have times to compare with the others here. But, she's strong.
Easy 10 sec car.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2015 | 07:40 AM
  #74  
Hammer Down's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 28
From: Bay Area
2015 E63S, 2018 E63S
Originally Posted by rawdvm
This is my list of mods:

EC 84mmS/C pulley
Belt-wrap kit & ASP pulleys
EC 550cc injectors (stock fuel rail)
EC 82mm TB
EC Heat Exchanger
NGK LFR7AIX plugs
AFE Pro Dry S filters
Wrapped, custom mid-length headers , no cats, x-pipe, no resonator (stock mufflers for now - looking at electric cut-outs & other mufflers)
EC Ported/polished heads (stock cams)
Weistec 170mm Modular CP
EC trunk tank (Dad's)
EC built transmission, 3K converter & TCU tune
Quaife LSD
EC dyno tune
548whp/610wtq (93 octane) on Jerry's new DynoJet 424XLC2 with the linx system (front & rear rollers linked together)

She is my daily driver. I haven't tracked her, yet, so, I don't have times to compare with the others here. But, she's strong.
Looks good now just get that beast to the track and join the club
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2015 | 01:16 PM
  #75  
mobhouse's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 242
Likes: 3
From: Houston
Mercedes E55
Originally Posted by rawdvm
This is my list of mods:

EC 84mmS/C pulley
Belt-wrap kit & ASP pulleys
EC 550cc injectors (stock fuel rail)
EC 82mm TB
EC Heat Exchanger
NGK LFR7AIX plugs
AFE Pro Dry S filters
Wrapped, custom mid-length headers , no cats, x-pipe, no resonator (stock mufflers for now - looking at electric cut-outs & other mufflers)
EC Ported/polished heads (stock cams)
Weistec 170mm Modular CP
EC trunk tank (Dad's)
EC built transmission, 3K converter & TCU tune
Quaife LSD
EC dyno tune
548whp/610wtq (93 octane) on Jerry's new DynoJet 424XLC2 with the linx system (front & rear rollers linked together)

She is my daily driver. I haven't tracked her, yet, so, I don't have times to compare with the others here. But, she's strong.
Damn that's crazy! I pushed out 490whp/544wtq on his new dyno. That thing is awesome!
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE