Real issues with tuned engine




I have a CL55, but I figured I would get more views over here. Same engine as you guys too.
I have a 180mm EC crank pulley, EC intercooler, new charge cooler pump and a EC map on my CL55.
Due to issues with the tuner that I used in the UK, they didn't do a dyno run, so this is the first time I have an opportunity to get it on one since the tuning. As I'm in the middle of complaints with then, I am reluctant to go back and get them to fix the problem.
My results where a bit sad:

The dyno operator said two things:
1. You would be dynoing 580-590 all day with those mods and
2. Your running very rich.
I have to agree. With an AFR 10.4:1 at the top end, something isn't right.
I have a boost pressure gauge inside the car, and he said he never saw it go above 13psi. With a 180mm crank pulley, I should be running around 14.8psi.
I have a new belt and new SC belt tensioner. I have not heard of the crank pulley, standard upper pulley combo slipping, but you never know?
He thinks its the map, I think There is boost loss somewhere.
Do I look at a) the map b) the SC belt or c) another source of boost loss.
I will be logging my boost pressure soon and will post up the results, I suspect to see it start dropping around 3500rpm.
Thanks all!
Also type of dyno makes a diff. Does this dyno operator get many 55K cars to know they should that high on his dyno? If not he is just throwing **** out there. My numbers are below and you can see I am heavily modified and don't hit 544 but that's bc of a diff dyno type. But for that dyno I am at a good spot.
Last edited by black06c230; Apr 25, 2015 at 11:31 AM.




So a) what is the reason its not making the correct boost, and b) is the reason for the rich running, due to boost loss or a map commanding too much fuel
I agree that the car should be dyno tuned to get the most of the components added, but I would be expecting 520-530 with a smaller supercharger pulley, I think there is is a bigger issue at play.
As you say, I need to log some information in 3rd and 4th (PSI vs RPM) and see what they show. A boost leak will be obvious if my boost is bouncing around all over the place.
You run the risk of tuning perceived richness out, that is going to bite you in the ***, when the weather gets colder, and suddenly you run lean on top.
(I'm not saying this is the case, I'm saying it might be the case)
Is the 544hp back calculated crank HP? sounds about right to me. if it is WHP, then ****. With just a pulley?




You run the risk of tuning perceived richness out, that is going to bite you in the ***, when the weather gets colder, and suddenly you run lean on top.
(I'm not saying this is the case, I'm saying it might be the case)
Is the 544hp back calculated crank HP? sounds about right to me. if it is WHP, then ****. With just a pulley?
Also, Boost isn't where it should be with a 180mm crank pulley. Is this due to a boost leak or belt slip?
544hp is calculated crank. With a 180mm crank pulley I would be expecting more. The tuner at the dyno shop also said you should be repeatedly running 580-590 on this dyno with those mods. He is well respected in the Mercedes tuning area around here.
I was monitoring intake air temps, it never went above 40 deg c - 100 Fahrenheit. It was approx 60 degrees F today.




If it shows an issue I will install a belt wrap kit firstly. Then check the gaskets etc between surge tanks and inlet.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Alexander, BeltWrap it...you'll definitely eliminate any suspect of slippage.
Last edited by principledchiro; Apr 30, 2015 at 05:52 AM.




I have my BWK on its way, and I will be tapping the surge tanks tomorrow. Once installed, I Will go back to the dyno, and they will be able to plot boost vs rpm.




So additional work done:
New surge tank gaskets
BWK
New SC belt
Surge tank tapped for boost reading.
1 step colder plugs
I think the boost is being bled back by the SC bypass valve rather than leaking from the system in the first place. I have cleaned my engine covers since the belt wrap kit and I am not getting any belt slippage as before. Same results, engine feels like the dyno graph, powerful midrange but flat after 3500rpm.
I monitor boost while driving with an ultra gauge and rarely see 12.5psi+ at high rpms.
I have had confirmation that an AFR of 12.5:1 is aimed for on this map, so anything less than that and the car is dumping fuel or bleeding boost for some reason.
I think it needs a real-time mapping session as others have said. Not really anywhere else to go as I haven't had much support from the tuners who carried out the modifications unfortunately.
























