TERRIBLE E63 Dyno Numbers FULL BOLT ONS
The car's first pull netted 419 whp, second pull made 429, and then 419. All pulls were about 380 ft-lbs. It was on a Dyno Dynamics, BUT IT RUNS A CORRECTION FACTOR TO MAKE IT +/- 5 WHP OF A DYNO JET. Please take my word on this. I operated one for several years.
On the same dyno a E55 with 180mm and tune made 450 whp and 500+ ft lbs. My CL55 made 430 whp and 440 ft lbs with primary cat delete, the same 200 cell cats, and a tune.
I am BEYOND pissed off right now. I know the re-tune from Eurocharged took because I no longer have a CEL for 02 sensors. The car has brand new plugs, burns no oil, and the oil stays completely clean. The engine is healthy. On the street the car pulls exactly like a stock C63 would.
I don't know what else to do at this point. Why is my car missing 50 WHP??? I spent $5,000 dollars this month on these mods. Can someone with heavy tuning experience please chime in.
Is a lack of X-pipe costing me 50 whp?
Last edited by layzie12g; May 16, 2015 at 07:53 PM.
I'm not comparing the 63 to a 55. I was using those numbers as a reference point. If the car was consuming oil through the intake manifold lowering the octane and pulling timing due to knock I could understand that, but I have found no reason to believe it is.
The only thing I can think to do is schedule a custom tune with Jerry and put a wideband in place of the secondary 02 sensor.
Ive tuned at least 20 dsms so im familar with data logging but have never done it with a benz or na car for that matter.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
With cats I figured you'd be in the 450-60rwhp range, anything beyond that I've only seen decatted 63 cars achieve.
Seeing as I made 431rwhp with no tune, your definitely missing some power (I was told the super flow dyno I used read low though).
Your car sounds nice though, get to the bottom of your problem and keep the updates coming.
Last edited by M-Theory; May 17, 2015 at 11:59 AM.
Tuning a car like that is incorrect. On a car without a cat it works ok. So if you think the car is at 11.5:1 going off the wideband after a cat, a wideband in place of a front 02 sensor or anywhere before the cat could be as lean as 12.5:1.
That is a huge difference. I've made over 1000 dyno pulls with my cars as well as customers. I do not know much about the software used to tune these cars, but I'd hope none of the tuners are using sniffers to tune cars with cats.
Last edited by layzie12g; May 19, 2015 at 12:30 AM.
If your car pulls good, and the af is around 11.8 from wot tip in to red line, your 429rwhp is not far off imo.
I would have to assume your guys dyno is not running any form or temperature correction. 540 on a Dynamics is a monster. So 430 on your dyno is 490+ on the dyno I was on. I do not see 430 on this dyno as being very close at all to the power the car should be making. On the dyno my car was on, yours would be making closer to the 640 range you saw on the Dyno Jet. Back when the guy that owned the shop I worked at got the dyno we also had a stock E55 on it which made 371 whp. This was before he learned about the correction factor.
When you get in to the temperature screen you will see yours as a 1.000 where the dyno I was on used 118 degrees as a room temp which will show 1.180. He keeps the correction factor constant so everyone has the same numbers from the day he got it. If I remember right his came with the "weather station" which makes corrections for temperature and humidity. Although when you manually override the temperature it is no longer used.
This is something quite a few people do with a Dyno Dynamics. I know numbers are just numbers, but it makes it easier for shop owners when the horsepower advertised is the horsepower put down.
You have a very bad *** car by the way. I like it a lot.
Last edited by layzie12g; May 18, 2015 at 11:09 PM.
Also, 11.8 is too rich of a target AFR for an N/A.
What's your theory on running tri-ys without a crossover?
As far as not using an x pipe goes I was trying to cut down the cost of fab time. Looking back I should have just bought the mid section with the x pipe. My N/A knowledge is limited when it comes to exhaust stuff for sure.
It may be worth a try to talk to MBH and see if they have any dyno experience with their LTs on the 63, with and w/out an X-pipe. They did on cats for the 55. I just tend to look at N/A like you need to cover all your bases to make optimum power.
Hoping you find the power you expected!
Thanks for the help though I appreciate it. I will be going back to the dyno with a wideband and will do some data logging.
Like you said, without any reference points, they are just numbers.
Given this scenario you could have made up a number and given as quantified a result

Why don't you try using the dyno as it is truly intended, as a TOOL to dial in a tune and diagnose for power.
Your problem isn't your tuner. You don't have the required data to determine ANYTHING.
With 1000's of dynos under your belt, I would think that a box tune run on an dyno with no datlogging shouldn't really worry you.








