Standing half mile
By accident I was talking to my buddy from Florida and he mentioned the 1/2 mile event...well holy crap here is the proof I needed and hopefully Kevin (centerline) can find an event and prove it. Keep in mind that I say that Kevin will possibly beat my 10.51 ctsv from 120-160 or 170. So, to kinda compare apples to apples here goes it...My buddy's CTSV went 10.72 at 131.09 mph and did the 1/2 mile at 158.6452 mph and I am telling everyone that from 120-160mph he will be FASTER then this car I am comparing! I think it proves that the VBOX works probably almost as good as EREBUS' mothers BOX!
By accident I was talking to my buddy from Florida and he mentioned the 1/2 mile event...well holy crap here is the proof I needed and hopefully Kevin (centerline) can find an event and prove it. Keep in mind that I say that Kevin will possibly beat my 10.51 ctsv from 120-160 or 170. So, to kinda compare apples to apples here goes it...My buddy's CTSV went 10.72 at 131.09 mph and did the 1/2 mile at 158.6452 mph and I am telling everyone that from 120-160mph he will be FASTER then this car I am comparing! I think it proves that the VBOX works probably almost as good as EREBUS' mothers BOX!
Last edited by chawkins2001; Jun 11, 2015 at 10:05 PM.
Local GA V went 10.57 at 134 in the 1/4 at 665rwhp
Ran the wannagofast 1/2 mile With 39xx DA 88% humidity at 155mph
Last edited by chawkins2001; Jun 11, 2015 at 10:25 PM.
As for the 160+ in the half I don't see why people (Erebus) find it so hard to believe. I have ZERO doubt my car would of been at or over 160 in the 1/2 the way it pulled up top and several other cars that were trapping like mine would be right there also. Problem is there's pretty much no 1/2 events for 99% of us to go to. Ahmad's car would blow the 160 away with almost running 144 in the 1/4.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Everyone thinks their cars have issues since they expected so much more
Everyone thinks their cars have issues since they expected so much more

Theres an event in Sept this year, two wheel oriented but cars are welcome too. Approx 1000ft above sea level.
Last edited by jmb614; Jun 14, 2015 at 09:51 PM.
Last edited by SICAMG; Jun 14, 2015 at 11:46 AM.
Proving me wrong only helps our platform. Because as of yet.....we have no proof that it can be done. I need a reason to believe. I'm close to giving up. And If some of you f**ktards can give me some hope...I will thank you ahead of time. Bring it.
By accident I was talking to my buddy from Florida and he mentioned the 1/2 mile event...well holy crap here is the proof I needed and hopefully Kevin (centerline) can find an event and prove it. Keep in mind that I say that Kevin will possibly beat my 10.51 ctsv from 120-160 or 170. So, to kinda compare apples to apples here goes it...My buddy's CTSV went 10.72 at 131.09 mph and did the 1/2 mile at 158.6452 mph and I am telling everyone that from 120-160mph he will be FASTER then this car I am comparing! I think it proves that the VBOX works probably almost as good as EREBUS' mothers BOX!

Cnterlines car is fast. I've seen it run in person. And Vbox numbers are very accurate. It is GPS based. We have to do a 1/2 mile event in the fall!
As for the M113k not being able to do 160 in the 1/2? Hmm I trapped 143.5 in the 1/4 and 60 to 130 in 5.6 seconds on my first day of tuning so 160 should be more than doable. RBJ has turbos so it will keep pulling like a freight train!
By accident I was talking to my buddy from Florida and he mentioned the 1/2 mile event...well holy crap here is the proof I needed and hopefully Kevin (centerline) can find an event and prove it. Keep in mind that I say that Kevin will possibly beat my 10.51 ctsv from 120-160 or 170. So, to kinda compare apples to apples here goes it...My buddy's CTSV went 10.72 at 131.09 mph and did the 1/2 mile at 158.6452 mph and I am telling everyone that from 120-160mph he will be FASTER then this car I am comparing! I think it proves that the VBOX works probably almost as good as EREBUS' mothers BOX!










