Why doesn't everyone have a methanol/water injection kit?
I've dreamed about installing an 8-port manifold block and putting a nozzle in the intake of each cylinder, but that would be:
a. Way too difficult
b. Expensive
c. Not really necessary
d. All of the above
I have the aquamist HFS-3, it injects based on IDC, by default it is set to inject at 42% IDC and ramps up flow thereafter based on IDC %; I've noticed I really have to be heavy into boost before it starts injecting. This parameter is adjustable from 12-72% IDC, there is also a gain setting that can be adjusted for larger than factory injectors. Mine is set to the defaults 42% IDC with no gain. I could probably stand to lower the injection point a bit, but it is very conservative on fluid consumption. I checked the tank Saturday and I can't tell if it's really consumed any or not, of course it has but I can't tell.
The end result is that meth offers me some octane and a little extra boost without rendering AFRs unpalatably rich. There is, however, no IAT benefit at all on my set up. If I could control the injection via the DashDAQ in a way which would help with IATs without killing AFR, I'd do it. I suspect, though, that this may not be possible on my set up - perhaps because I'm using only 1 nozzle pre-blower

I've dreamed about installing an 8-port manifold block and putting a nozzle in the intake of each cylinder, but that would be:
a. Way too difficult
b. Expensive
c. Not really necessary
d. All of the above
The end result is that meth offers me some octane and a little extra boost without rendering AFRs unpalatably rich. There is, however, no IAT benefit at all on my set up. If I could control the injection via the DashDAQ in a way which would help with IATs without killing AFR, I'd do it. I suspect, though, that this may not be possible on my set up - perhaps because I'm using only 1 nozzle pre-blower

The Best of Mercedes & AMG




I've dreamed about installing an 8-port manifold block and putting a nozzle in the intake of each cylinder, but that would be:
a. Way too difficult
b. Expensive
c. Not really necessary
d. All of the above
Technically, it seems (not you) people sometimes confuse what the Meth/water is there for, or what it can do from different input positions.
If you inject it at the back of the valve, you are staving off detonation - which is a great thing. Lowering EGTs, piston crown tempts, and cleaning the ports. All good.
But you are not specifically affecting IAT numbers that the computer can see. If you want to do that, you need to to change the air tempature before the sensor sees it (but also make sure this detonation reducing process actually helps in the chamber too!)
I don't see specific reason to shot the water meth at the supercharger screws. I have seen data that is inconclusive in that actually helping.
The best of both worlds would be e85 in the port, and meth/water in the intake stream so the computer sees it. Thereby increasing timing (not retarding really) and also reducing knock to near zero.
Also attached is a log on the same day, about an hour before the meth pass, this with just ice in the tank, no meth.
It will be nice to see what the real results end up being when I go to the track again soon.
So far so good, I'm happy with it thus far.
How is this holding up? In particular, what kind of gains did you see at the strip with the meth?
Also, how's your MAP sensor holding up? In this thread from June 2011 (https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...locations.html), sneakyneon said he moved his post-IC nozzle because he'd "gone through 2 map sensors in a years time frame".
Thanks.


