Acceleration Nation 2 Fastest Production Cars
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03 E55 k2; Ford GT
Acceleration Nation 2 Fastest Production Cars
Popular Mechanics 2004 May Issue
Acceleration Nation 2
Article on the 8 fastest production cars in the world. E55 (8) and SL 600 (5) made the list. My only complaint is the times for the E55 were 12.89 at 115 and 0 to 60 in 5.06. All the other cars performed according to recent road tests so I don't think the weather had much to do with it. Before I modified my E55, I ran consistently between 12.5 and 12.6.
E55 12.89 at 115.8
Gallardo 12.53 at 116
Corvette Z06 12.53 at 115.38
SL 600 12.48 at 117.42
Porsche 911 Turbo 12.39 at 118.43
Viper SRT-10 12.07 at 120
Ford GT 11.69 at 122.74
Saleen S7 11.51 at 127.38
Overall a great showing for MB. Carrera GT, SLR and Ferrari declined the invitation.
Acceleration Nation 2
Article on the 8 fastest production cars in the world. E55 (8) and SL 600 (5) made the list. My only complaint is the times for the E55 were 12.89 at 115 and 0 to 60 in 5.06. All the other cars performed according to recent road tests so I don't think the weather had much to do with it. Before I modified my E55, I ran consistently between 12.5 and 12.6.
E55 12.89 at 115.8
Gallardo 12.53 at 116
Corvette Z06 12.53 at 115.38
SL 600 12.48 at 117.42
Porsche 911 Turbo 12.39 at 118.43
Viper SRT-10 12.07 at 120
Ford GT 11.69 at 122.74
Saleen S7 11.51 at 127.38
Overall a great showing for MB. Carrera GT, SLR and Ferrari declined the invitation.
![Cool](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Acceleration Nation 2 Fastest Production Cars
Originally posted by saber
Carrera GT, SLR and Ferrari declined the invitation.
Carrera GT, SLR and Ferrari declined the invitation.
![Cool](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Trending Topics
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03 E55 k2; Ford GT
According to the article, all models were 2004s. They are all faster than the 2003 models. I don't know about the cobra, I read somewere that they were 13.2 cars but I could be wrong. Interesting note was that there was a large paragraph devoted to the Audi RS6. It stated that they spend a lot of time trying every different way to get a sub 13 sec quarter and could not. I think the best was 13.3. The way I read the piece, it kind of implied that unlike most of the other cars in the test the advertised horsepower rating for the RS 6 might be inflated.
#11
Super Member
Originally posted by saber
According to the article, all models were 2004s. They are all faster than the 2003 models. I don't know about the cobra, I read somewere that they were 13.2 cars but I could be wrong. Interesting note was that there was a large paragraph devoted to the Audi RS6. It stated that they spend a lot of time trying every different way to get a sub 13 sec quarter and could not. I think the best was 13.3. The way I read the piece, it kind of implied that unlike most of the other cars in the test the advertised horsepower rating for the RS 6 might be inflated.
According to the article, all models were 2004s. They are all faster than the 2003 models. I don't know about the cobra, I read somewere that they were 13.2 cars but I could be wrong. Interesting note was that there was a large paragraph devoted to the Audi RS6. It stated that they spend a lot of time trying every different way to get a sub 13 sec quarter and could not. I think the best was 13.3. The way I read the piece, it kind of implied that unlike most of the other cars in the test the advertised horsepower rating for the RS 6 might be inflated.
Last edited by dgussin1; 04-21-2004 at 01:11 AM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, Fla.
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2004 E55
dgussin1:
I see you are in Southern Calif (heat) and have modded your e55 to turn 11's. This is quite respectable in a warmer climate. What exactly have you done and what is your best recorded time and speed. Your opinion on "your" mods and if the manufacturer lived up to claims - ie. - was the money spent worth the performance enhancement? Thanks for your input.
Ken s-E55
I see you are in Southern Calif (heat) and have modded your e55 to turn 11's. This is quite respectable in a warmer climate. What exactly have you done and what is your best recorded time and speed. Your opinion on "your" mods and if the manufacturer lived up to claims - ie. - was the money spent worth the performance enhancement? Thanks for your input.
Ken s-E55
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
![woowoo](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/woowoo.gif)
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
dgussin1 was referring to his Cobra in his post.
I think he has not yet done any mods to his father's E55 yet.
His Cobra is crazy fast though. He took me for a ride in it. That supercharger is LOUD!
I think he has not yet done any mods to his father's E55 yet.
His Cobra is crazy fast though. He took me for a ride in it. That supercharger is LOUD!
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#14
Super Member
Originally posted by t-bone
dgussin1 was referring to his Cobra in his post.
I think he has not yet done any mods to his father's E55 yet.
His Cobra is crazy fast though. He took me for a ride in it. That supercharger is LOUD!
dgussin1 was referring to his Cobra in his post.
I think he has not yet done any mods to his father's E55 yet.
His Cobra is crazy fast though. He took me for a ride in it. That supercharger is LOUD!
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)