W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

More E60 M5 info/pics!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-28-2004, 01:35 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Kain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
N/A
More E60 M5 info/pics!

Pics: http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=41322
Interior pics: http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=41298
Info: http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=40787

“It’s been a few days now and I can still hear the new M5 V10’s ringing in my ears. You don’t often get cars driving on to stands at motor shows, but at the Geneva Auto Salon the legendary Hans Stuck gingerly piloted the ‘M5 Concept’ from its hiding place on to the BMW stand to the rapturous applause of the assembled press. For a couple of spine-tingling seconds he gave the V10 some beans and believe me when I say the car will be worth buying for the noise alone. Higher pitched than the current car’s V8, more tuneful than the M3 CSL and pretty **** close to standing in the F1 pits when the Williams F1 car is being warmed up. Glorious”

Bob Harper Bmw Car Magazine Editor
Old 04-28-2004, 03:41 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
MadC32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C 32 AMG (203.065)
love the way the guy has parked the new car.. baaam, hit the rail lol..

I really liked the E39 M5, but this car is just butt ugly
Old 04-28-2004, 03:56 PM
  #3  
Member
 
AC556F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'08 SL65
The Bangle M5: The car Stevie Wonder would love.
Old 04-28-2004, 04:46 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
TectiteE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MGT, 12 CLS63 Launch
i'd have to say that the car would be hot if it wasn't for the rear of the car. WTF are they thinking with that trunk? hopefully they will lower it and round it off so it flows with the car when they get a facelift next.


BTW- bangle didn't design the 5 series
Old 04-28-2004, 05:17 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Sleestack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was reading an article on the BMW 4 series coupe (which looks really promising) in R&T and they were saying that BMW admitted that the styling of the rear on the 7 and 5, specifically the trunk, was probably a mistake. They seemed to indicate that the rear on all BMWs would be restyled shortly. I am hoping that is true. I am interested in getting the new M5 as my next daily driver but unless they redo the trunk and there is a kit for the front and rear bumpers, my next daily driver is definitely not going to be a M5.
Old 04-28-2004, 07:41 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 3,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 E55 AMG
Yuck, the new M5 is UGLY! The old one was really nice but....yeah. I would like to hear the V10 though!
Old 04-30-2004, 06:18 PM
  #7  
Almost a Member!
 
teflon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OMFG is that ugly! I am a BMW fan at heart, but this I cannot accept. I know the performance will sell me, but jeez!

I do like the side skirts and understyling though (esp rear underspoiler and tailpipes) - very cool there! The kabuki front end and bustle trunk have GOT to go!

I just saw my first live-in-person 6-series - Now that will be a beautiful and promising "M" car!!!
Old 05-01-2004, 07:15 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
EDWARD CONROY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E55
I could never get used to it. First off, to me the most important exterior part of a car is the rear. It's the view of a car people see the longest and most closely in traffic. You sit behind something and the thoughts form in your head about whether you like that model or question the taste of the person behind the wheel. For me there has to be a symetry to it, the tail lights have to have a nice look, and there certainly can't be no stupid muffler showing like a lot of cars have. To me, the E55 is attractive and tasteful when viewed from behind. As for the front of the M5, it appears to have an expression, and a sinister one. For a car to have an expression, to me it's, as the Jerky Boys would say....silly lookin.
Old 05-01-2004, 08:01 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
jkrutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sunshine Ranches, FL
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'06 M6, '05 Lambo Gallardo
I guess I am in the minority, but I like the rear of the CONCEPT M5 pictures I have seen. What I don't like is the side view or how the headlights creep into the fenders. I know the interior won't touch the E55, but I wonder if it will be better than I am expecting. I have noticed that I highly prefer a black interior. I wonder if the M5's interior will look much better in black? I have also seen a few new 5 series in black....it is a major improvement for the car IMO. One (that had custom wheels) actually caught my eye in a good way....time will tell.
Old 05-01-2004, 12:22 PM
  #10  
Out Of Control!!
 
IluvS500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 12,744
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland
I like it......
Old 05-01-2004, 12:45 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
kyee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That looked like a manual transmission. I thought the new M5 was going to be SMG only?
Old 05-01-2004, 12:54 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
G Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love it.
Old 05-02-2004, 10:09 AM
  #13  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Kain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
N/A
Originally posted by kyee
That looked like a manual transmission. I thought the new M5 was going to be SMG only?
That is not manual. It is the 7-speed SMG III.
Old 05-04-2004, 10:22 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Chappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 9,731
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
AMG
So, no manual on the new E60 M5? Is this correct?
Old 05-04-2004, 10:41 AM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
norb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, Texas - USA
Posts: 1,634
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
That is correct, but SMG is considered by some to be a manual.
Old 05-04-2004, 10:47 AM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Chappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 9,731
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
AMG
Originally posted by norb
That is correct, but SMG is considered by some to be a manual.
Perhaps in the sense of "manual" control, but it does take the driver out of the equation...
Old 05-04-2004, 11:00 AM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
norb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, Texas - USA
Posts: 1,634
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Umm, no it doesn't, how does it take the driver out of the equation? I guess those formula one cars drive themselves around the track.
Old 05-04-2004, 11:04 AM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Chappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 9,731
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
AMG
Pushing buttons on a steering wheel just doesn't have the same involvement as a stick. Wouldn't you agree?
Old 05-04-2004, 11:36 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
kyee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand your point, Chappy. But I also understand Norb's point.

I too would've preferred having the option of either the SMG or a true manual stickshift. When purchasing my E500, I debated a long time between that and the 2003 M5, and the 2004 545i, both in the stickshift versions.

I ended up with the E500, but still long for a manual shift. I think with BMW going with SMG only on the M5, that they'll lose some of those customers who are on the fence between the two of them. I do see the benefits of SMG, but a manual shift has it's fans too.
Old 05-04-2004, 12:25 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
MelsE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 E55, Brilliant Silver/Charcoal and Grey, All option except Parktronic.
Sequential Manual Gearbox

I have to go with Norb on this one. SMG is a manual gearbox as differentiated from an automatic. It has no torque converter, uses a clutch plate, and engages and disengages gears rather than applying clutch packs and belts to planetary gearsets.

If one watches a FIA rally many of the cars are equipped like a SMG, that is with a stick shift and steering wheel paddles. I like the SMG concept as I have ridden motorcycles all my life so it is not a new paradigm for me.

The car is still ugly though it might look better in black, like a dark room or a tunnel, buried in a hole, something like that.
Old 05-04-2004, 12:40 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Chappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 9,731
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
AMG
Thanks for the clarification (re: SMG vs. auto). I guess my whole point (in a roundabout way) is that "purist" M5 owners have expressed to me on previous occasions the following:

"I would've gotten the AMG, had it been available with a stick"

A stick...not SMG (I, II, or III). My supposition is that this would no longer be a valid argument. Frankly, I think BMW is making a mistake by not offering a stick on the new M5. My speculation is that the M3 will no longer be available with a stick at some point as well.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 PM.