Debate: Brabus vs AMG
His standpoint is that they will never be as good as a proper inhouse FACTORY job like AMG who have spent millions in R&D and comply to strict Mercedes standards. He thinks having someone like Brabus mess around with base units from Mercedes/AMG will somehow make them less reliable and not "proper" because they are a 3rd party company using their own bits.
I'd just like to see what peoples views are here.
Some tuning involves adding components that are of better quality than those used by MB (e.g. Brembo BBK, suspension, etc.) so in that sense your father is wrong. Sure, the car might not perform the way the factory intended, but that often isn't a bad thing. From the perspective of performace, I don't see why your father would argue that stock MBs perform better, given that the whol purpose of aftermarket tuning is to improve performance.
What about at the top end with the 65 engines and the big Brabus V12's? They are both around 600bhp, which would you choose and why? Considering they are both alot of money.
Trending Topics
What about at the top end with the 65 engines and the big Brabus V12's? They are both around 600bhp, which would you choose and why? Considering they are both alot of money.
1. Better warranty
2. Better resale
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
At $175,000 + I'd take the AMG 65 for two reasons:
1. Better warranty
2. Better resale
...Hopefully I can get at least a set of HRE's and a kit on it and then we would be rollin
Keep in mind, when DaimlerChrysler is developing a new model, AMG is part of the Team from the beginning to see where the stock model can already be improved, and also to have stuff built in a certain way (exhaust pipes etc.), so AMG can add their parts more easily later on.
On the other hand, some of you surely know the SMART-cars: As for SMART having a top model in each class, they have the Smart-Brabus GmbH, which is a joint venture from DC. I'm sure thats a sign of Brabus being (almost) equal to AMG-quality.







