Killer Chiller Or Trunk Tank Or Front Mount H/E
Here is my concern with the KC vs just doing a 3g trunk tank. I've read that when temps get warm and I live in cali the A/C unit not working at full potential is going to be an issue for me. Just wondering from all the people who have installed the KC unit is it a common problem? is it a matter of just dumping more Freon into the system to compensate for the KC unit install. Not sure just wanted to see what people have experienced with them. I know it works and is the best route too get those intake temps down reading all the threads. Just not 100% on how the A/C unit will work and can it keep up with 90+ degree weather and at times 100+.
If I don't go with a KC and go with a trunk tank instead wont it be better to do the DTK front mount that has the pressure cap and more volume and as I drive air passes through?
Don't go anywhere near that DTK heat exchanger. It requires lots of cutting and removing things to fit, it's also very poorly welded. Go with a PLM, Eurocharged, or if you feel inclined to give the little rat your business, VRP.
Last edited by Davednconfused; Jul 3, 2018 at 12:30 PM.
I considered a KC but decided against it, here are my reasons:
- AC ALWAYS need to be running.
- Questionable longterm reliability (and AC components are expensive if they fail).
- Again, AC turns off at WOT, so once you're in it you're relying solely on that cold tank water as the KC does not utilize a heat exchanger.
Of course, my reasons are mine alone. I'd recommend that you do research and go from there.
I should have also mentioned that once you go KC, you will need to remove that heat exchanger. It is not utilized in the system. So it'll just be a tank and a KC.
I considered a KC but decided against it, here are my reasons:
- AC ALWAYS need to be running.
- Questionable longterm reliability (and AC components are expensive if they fail).
- Again, AC turns off at WOT, so once you're in it you're relying solely on that cold tank water as the KC does not utilize a heat exchanger.
Of course, my reasons are mine alone. I'd recommend that you do research and go from there.
I should have also mentioned that once you go KC, you will need to remove that heat exchanger. It is not utilized in the system. So it'll just be a tank and a KC.
Ok ill go with your advice basically where I need to go first to is a good front mount H/E and if I need more do a 3-5 gallon trunk tank. Based on what you said about KC I really don't want the hassle since its a daily driver and pass on it. I'm not going crazy with the pulley size at all and a good front mount with a trunk tank should do me good then. Is the PLM or VRP just a replacement for your stock unit ?. I wanted to add a secondary one to the stock unit and from there decide wether I should go trunk tank or not based on how IAT's are.
2nd Heat Exchanger just purchased. So ill take it get it installed and see what happens. With a 80mm pulley I should be fine. I'm only looking to be about 450-460 RWHP and about 500 RWTQ. I think for a daily driver and as old as the car is as long as it's maintained well it should be fine.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Last edited by karpetcm; Jul 3, 2018 at 01:43 PM.




On the KC, it seems that you could do heat exchangers and the KC tank so the post-intercooler water goes into the heat exchangers THEN the KC/tank, then back into the IC.


