2003/4 E55 AMG 0-60mph.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 5,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'03 Yukon XL Denali, '06 Eclipse GS
The common timing is 4.5 secs. However, if you look at the E55 specs on the official AMG site it now mentions 4.7 secs... odd...
#4
Originally posted by MBE55AMG
The common timing is 4.5 secs. However, if you look at the E55 specs on the official AMG site it now mentions 4.7 secs... odd...
The common timing is 4.5 secs. However, if you look at the E55 specs on the official AMG site it now mentions 4.7 secs... odd...
No, it mentions 4.5 still !
#5
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55
Re: 2003/4 E55 AMG 0-60mph.
Originally posted by CHILE_E55AMG
Hi...
Ive heard lots fo numbers on 0-60mph. of the beast.
4.3seconds - 4.5seconds - 4.7seconds.
Whats the true?
Hi...
Ive heard lots fo numbers on 0-60mph. of the beast.
4.3seconds - 4.5seconds - 4.7seconds.
Whats the true?
More imprtantly, a few months ago Motor Trend or C&D said hte E55 was the fastest from 30--50 of all cars. That is a time I am more likely to notice!!
Have fun, Chile.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55, F550, S600 Ducati 999
Originally posted by MBE55AMG
The common timing is 4.5 secs. However, if you look at the E55 specs on the official AMG site it now mentions 4.7 secs... odd...
The common timing is 4.5 secs. However, if you look at the E55 specs on the official AMG site it now mentions 4.7 secs... odd...
Trending Topics
#8
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55
Re: Re: 2003/4 E55 AMG 0-60mph.
Originally posted by Pbglas
Hard to tell which is true since these times depend on so many things. The lowest I have seen is 4.3 and I choose to beleive it.
More imprtantly, a few months ago Motor Trend or C&D said hte E55 was the fastest from 30--50 of all cars. That is a time I am more likely to notice!!
Have fun, Chile.
Hard to tell which is true since these times depend on so many things. The lowest I have seen is 4.3 and I choose to beleive it.
More imprtantly, a few months ago Motor Trend or C&D said hte E55 was the fastest from 30--50 of all cars. That is a time I am more likely to notice!!
Have fun, Chile.
BTW MB has always quoted 4.7 for 0--100KmPH -- I think,
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S4
Originally posted by WyattH
You can always trust the boys at MB to overstate their times and power! I too believe 4.2!
You can always trust the boys at MB to overstate their times and power! I too believe 4.2!
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55, F550, S600 Ducati 999
0-60mph is almost irrelevant as a performance statistic. It is as much a function of traction as power. Far more telling is 0-100mph and 0-200kmh(124mph) stats.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alfa Romeo 147 1.6TS
Don't worry Benz are lying - the true 0-60mph time is 4.2 - 4.4 seconds.
Mercedes AG already got in trouble for understating their performance statistics before - they were fined by the TÚV in Germany because they said the Sl55 AMG made 479bhp and every one they sent for type approval was knocking out 500bhp+
lol
Mercedes AG already got in trouble for understating their performance statistics before - they were fined by the TÚV in Germany because they said the Sl55 AMG made 479bhp and every one they sent for type approval was knocking out 500bhp+
lol