Headers
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Headers
this week i will be installing my 80mm pulley and tune. My next mod most likely will be headers. I will not be doing long tubes, i need to stay smog legal and live in cali. Any headers that just replace the stock ones and keep my primaries?.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,350
Received 286 Likes
on
240 Posts
2010 E63 AMG, 2003 E500
On my E500 I had Eurocharged mid-lengths installed and have been very happy with the hp gains and modest noise increase. Lost my primary cats, but kept the secondaries and replaced the resonator with an x-pipe.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Last edited by w204_racing; 09-16-2018 at 05:05 PM.
Trending Topics
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Shorties are a waste of time I am afraid. The goal is to eliminate the tiny header to cat connection of the stock setup. This is the real restriction. I don't know how it works in California but I would either stay stock or try and use eurocharged headers with an aftermarket cat welded underneath.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Richmond, CA
Posts: 3,250
Received 255 Likes
on
233 Posts
2001 E320 Wagon, 2006 LBZ Silverado, 2007 E63 (sold), 2001 E55 (sold)
Shorties are a waste of time I am afraid. The goal is to eliminate the tiny header to cat connection of the stock setup. This is the real restriction. I don't know how it works in California but I would either stay stock or try and use eurocharged headers with an aftermarket cat welded underneath.
I hate this ****ing state and can't wait to get the **** out.
#11
Super Member
Thread Starter
And this is my problem. Yes I’ve ran past cars with long tubes and no cats and yes i know someone to pass smog. I’m just over it and would like higher flow headers and keep it legal. With this car in cali i see it’s not likely or possible or not even worth the trouble. Im gonna leave the stock exhaust alone. In 2-3 years ill be interested in a 2013+E63 and go from there. Ill just enjoy what i have now.
There are no aftermarket cats that I know of that are CARB/EPA certified. Aftermarket cats are pretty much as illegal as not running any at all here. Just removing the cats can get you in a lot of trouble and most shops won't do it.
I hate this ****ing state and can't wait to get the **** out.[/QUOTE]
#13
Member
If I were you, I would get PLM headers (similar to renntech, if not an exact copy, but a lot cheaper). They are direct bolt on with no changes to the rest of the exhaust system (cats, etc). You can find them on ebay. I think the seller usually offers a significant discount compared to the listing price if you PM him and ask. They're not quite as good as long tubes, but several (supposedly un-biased) forum members have posted impressive dyno results (IIRC, something like 30-40 whp).
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
30-40whp would be longtube territory. You will increase torque but I wouldn't expect much on the top end.
Different engine but the C32 crowd would be lucky to get 5whp with shorties.
Different engine but the C32 crowd would be lucky to get 5whp with shorties.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Here in wonderful California you have to have primary cats or you won't pass smog. It's also a very expensive fine if you get stopped by the police for not having cats.
There are no aftermarket cats that I know of that are CARB/EPA certified. Aftermarket cats are pretty much as illegal as not running any at all here. Just removing the cats can get you in a lot of trouble and most shops won't do it.
I hate this ****ing state and can't wait to get the **** out.
There are no aftermarket cats that I know of that are CARB/EPA certified. Aftermarket cats are pretty much as illegal as not running any at all here. Just removing the cats can get you in a lot of trouble and most shops won't do it.
I hate this ****ing state and can't wait to get the **** out.
And if we are keeping score:
Mississippi = 1 California = 2,894,235,102
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
I have Kleemann header and they are mid. Your ECU need to re-program so will not show check engine light (removing Primary CAT)
The only issue is visual inspection otherwise you should pass any Smog check. I have my header for 7 years and bring good power and sound.
Don't waste you money in shorties... they don't bring much power.... Renntech used to sell $2K for those shorties...
The only issue is visual inspection otherwise you should pass any Smog check. I have my header for 7 years and bring good power and sound.
Don't waste you money in shorties... they don't bring much power.... Renntech used to sell $2K for those shorties...
#17
Member
I know everyone swears by long tubes, but has anyone actually done dyno testing to see what the difference actually is (not counting the claims of manufacturers)? Has anyone dyno'd shorties vs stock and not had good numbers?
You can't really compare with a C32, the manifolds are a lot more restrictive for the E55 (same design, but much higher power output in the E55 means the manifolds are holding it back more). The gains should be much more on an E55 than a C32.
No doubt long tubes are better, but if you can't have long tubes, I think shorties are well worth the money.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
There are plenty of dynos from people running long tubes and those running mid length to get an overall impression of the differences. I'm not saying I'm correct by any means it just doesn't sound realistic for shorties.
The other way to think about the C32 comparison is that if the stock header to cat join was so restrictive that it didn't result in any increase in power.... the effect must be at least as bad on the E55 if not much worse.
Not many people are objective about their mods. Again not the E55 but when I got a tune for the CLK55 from eurocharged I would be surprised if it gave 4hp. It did give a whole heap of mid range torque but no one ever mentioned that, all the fixation was on trying to prove it gave an extra 20-30hp to the top end which it didn't. When someone finally did a back to back dyno you could hardly see the difference in the lines near redline.
The other way to think about the C32 comparison is that if the stock header to cat join was so restrictive that it didn't result in any increase in power.... the effect must be at least as bad on the E55 if not much worse.
Not many people are objective about their mods. Again not the E55 but when I got a tune for the CLK55 from eurocharged I would be surprised if it gave 4hp. It did give a whole heap of mid range torque but no one ever mentioned that, all the fixation was on trying to prove it gave an extra 20-30hp to the top end which it didn't. When someone finally did a back to back dyno you could hardly see the difference in the lines near redline.
#19
I am pretty sure California switched over to just visual smog checks without the tail pipe test. As long as your OBDII isn't throwing codes you should be fine.
https://www.bar.ca.gov/Consumer/New_...heck_Test.html
https://www.bar.ca.gov/Consumer/New_...heck_Test.html
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Richmond, CA
Posts: 3,250
Received 255 Likes
on
233 Posts
2001 E320 Wagon, 2006 LBZ Silverado, 2007 E63 (sold), 2001 E55 (sold)
I am pretty sure California switched over to just visual smog checks without the tail pipe test. As long as your OBDII isn't throwing codes you should be fine.
https://www.bar.ca.gov/Consumer/New_...heck_Test.html
https://www.bar.ca.gov/Consumer/New_...heck_Test.html