2003 E55 Dyno Results

Subscribe
Search this Thread
Oct 23, 2018 | 02:53 PM
  #1  
failboat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
failboat
Member
close
  • Join Date
    May 2018
  • Posts:
    95
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Vehicle(s) I drive
    none yet
  • Likes:
    3
  • Liked:
    5 Times in 4 Posts
Threw my car on the dyno today.
it was a mustang dyno, but they corrected the figures to represent dynojet numbers...424whp 452wtq
Can’t wait to see what it’ll put down with a pulley and some longtubes!




Reply 0
Oct 23, 2018 | 09:29 PM
  #2  
Lriver1004's Avatar
Member
Lriver1004
Member
close
  • Join Date
    Sep 2018
  • Posts:
    98
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Vehicle(s) I drive
    2012 CLS63
  • Likes:
    1
  • Liked:
    3 Times in 2 Posts
What were the original uncorrected numbers?
Reply 0
Oct 24, 2018 | 11:53 AM
  #3  
failboat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
failboat
Member
close
  • Join Date
    May 2018
  • Posts:
    95
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Vehicle(s) I drive
    none yet
  • Likes:
    3
  • Liked:
    5 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lriver1004
What were the original uncorrected numbers?
i believe it was 352whp and 375wtq
Reply 0
Oct 24, 2018 | 02:13 PM
  #4  
kenneyd's Avatar
Super Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
kenneyd
Super Member
close
  • Join Date
    Sep 2011
  • Posts:
    878
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Vehicle(s) I drive
    poop
  • Likes:
    74
  • Liked:
    638 Times in 286 Posts
Thats almost 20% difference.
The interwebs generally say its in the 12% range.
Reply 0
Oct 24, 2018 | 03:21 PM
  #5  
cfmistry's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
cfmistry
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
  • Join Date
    Jan 2015
  • Posts:
    1,019
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Vehicle(s) I drive
    15 S550 4Matic, 86 560SL
  • Likes:
    38
  • Liked:
    358 Times in 216 Posts
I agree those numbers are grossly overcorrected.
Reply 0
Oct 24, 2018 | 08:00 PM
  #6  
Sulaco's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Sulaco
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
  • Join Date
    Mar 2005
  • Location
    America
  • Posts:
    2,418
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Vehicle(s) I drive
    1999 C43 AMG, 2005 E55 Wagon
  • Likes:
    172
  • Liked:
    194 Times in 156 Posts
Mine went on a Mustang dyno WITHOUT being corrected.

Long tubes, 72mm, colder plugs, bwk, split cooling system, and an ECU tune: 418rwhp, 472 rwtq. The rumor mill thinks our transmissions suck about 19%, so correcting to crank figures that would make: 516hp and 582ft lbs.

I have no idea if these numbers are remotely accurate.
Reply 0
Oct 24, 2018 | 09:47 PM
  #7  
Lriver1004's Avatar
Member
Lriver1004
Member
close
  • Join Date
    Sep 2018
  • Posts:
    98
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Vehicle(s) I drive
    2012 CLS63
  • Likes:
    1
  • Liked:
    3 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by failboat
i believe it was 352whp and 375wtq
Nice. I made 362whp and 424wtq on a mustang dyno with a bad ic pump
Reply 0
Trending Topics
Oct 25, 2018 | 01:06 AM
  #8  
failboat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
failboat
Member
close
  • Join Date
    May 2018
  • Posts:
    95
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Vehicle(s) I drive
    none yet
  • Likes:
    3
  • Liked:
    5 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfmistry
I agree those numbers are grossly overcorrected.
yes, but aren’t both those numbers in the correct range for what a typical stock e55 runs?
Reply 0
Oct 25, 2018 | 05:21 AM
  #9  
99lightning's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
99lightning
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
  • Join Date
    Dec 2011
  • Location
    new ringgold pa
  • Posts:
    1,485
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Vehicle(s) I drive
    99 ford lightning
  • Likes:
    0
  • Liked:
    26 Times in 25 Posts
leaving my dynojet on standard mine made 423hp trapping 116mph at the track.
Reply 0
Oct 25, 2018 | 06:57 PM
  #10  
oneslow55's Avatar
Super Member
oneslow55
Super Member
close
  • Join Date
    Sep 2016
  • Posts:
    804
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Vehicle(s) I drive
    E55 amg
  • Likes:
    12
  • Liked:
    62 Times in 59 Posts
Number are accurate to dyno ject factors.Strong car my friend and you should see some nice gains on your mods.
Reply 0
Oct 25, 2018 | 11:05 PM
  #11  
failboat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
failboat
Member
close
  • Join Date
    May 2018
  • Posts:
    95
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Vehicle(s) I drive
    none yet
  • Likes:
    3
  • Liked:
    5 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oneslow55
Number are accurate to dyno ject factors.Strong car my friend and you should see some nice gains on your mods.
thanks, the goal with the car was always to be able to keep up with the new stock biturbo cars, i’m confident I’ll get there with a good set of longtubes and a pulley
Reply 0
Subscribe
 Reply to Thread
Back to Subforum
W211 AMG
View Next Unread
Does anyone have a picture of their aux connection?
Currently Active Users (1)
 
1/1
1