2003 E55 Dyno Results - MBWorld.org Forums

10-23-2018, 02:53 PM

#1

failboat

Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: May 2018

Posts: 95

Likes: 3

Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

none yet

2003 E55 Dyno Results

Threw my car on the dyno today.
it was a mustang dyno, but they corrected the figures to represent dynojet numbers...424whp 452wtq
Can’t wait to see what it’ll put down with a pulley and some longtubes!

Last edited by failboat; 10-23-2018 at 03:30 PM.

Reply Like

10-23-2018, 09:29 PM

#2

Lriver1004

Member

Join Date: Sep 2018

Posts: 98

Likes: 1

Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

2012 CLS63

What were the original uncorrected numbers?

Reply Like

10-24-2018, 11:53 AM

#3

failboat

Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: May 2018

Posts: 95

Likes: 3

Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

none yet

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lriver1004

What were the original uncorrected numbers?

i believe it was 352whp and 375wtq

Reply Like

10-24-2018, 02:13 PM

#4

kenneyd

Super Member

Join Date: Sep 2011

Posts: 866

Likes: 74

Received 608 Likes on 273 Posts

poop

Thats almost 20% difference.
The interwebs generally say its in the 12% range.

Reply Like

10-24-2018, 03:21 PM

#5

cfmistry

MBWorld Fanatic!

Join Date: Jan 2015

Posts: 1,018

Likes: 38

Received 352 Likes on 215 Posts

15 S550 4Matic, 86 560SL

I agree those numbers are grossly overcorrected.

Reply Like

10-24-2018, 08:00 PM

#6

Sulaco

MBWorld Fanatic!

Join Date: Mar 2005

Location: America

Posts: 2,360

Likes: 160

Received 179 Likes on 146 Posts

1999 C43 AMG, 2005 E55 Wagon

Mine went on a Mustang dyno WITHOUT being corrected.

Long tubes, 72mm, colder plugs, bwk, split cooling system, and an ECU tune: 418rwhp, 472 rwtq. The rumor mill thinks our transmissions suck about 19%, so correcting to crank figures that would make: 516hp and 582ft lbs.

I have no idea if these numbers are remotely accurate.

Reply Like

10-24-2018, 09:47 PM

#7

Lriver1004

Member

Join Date: Sep 2018

Posts: 98

Likes: 1

Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

2012 CLS63

Quote:

Originally Posted by failboat

i believe it was 352whp and 375wtq

Nice. I made 362whp and 424wtq on a mustang dyno with a bad ic pump

Reply Like

Trending Topics

Odd issue with new to me E63s Wagon - PCA innoperative, loss of all...

26

305
Assyst Plus Sticks to 365 Days after 4 Days of Ownership?

22

342
2020 GLS stuck in update mode

34

601
2012 S550 Big Repair Bill Incoming - Ongoing Saga

49

1k
CPS clip broke....oiling leaking somewhere

18

209

10-25-2018, 01:06 AM

#8

failboat

Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: May 2018

Posts: 95

Likes: 3

Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

none yet

Quote:

Originally Posted by cfmistry

I agree those numbers are grossly overcorrected.

yes, but aren’t both those numbers in the correct range for what a typical stock e55 runs?

Reply Like

10-25-2018, 05:21 AM

#9

99lightning

MBWorld Fanatic!

Join Date: Dec 2011

Location: new ringgold pa

Posts: 1,482

Likes: 0

Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts

99 ford lightning

leaving my dynojet on standard mine made 423hp trapping 116mph at the track.

Reply Like

10-25-2018, 06:57 PM

#10

oneslow55

Super Member

Join Date: Sep 2016

Posts: 804

Likes: 12

Received 62 Likes on 59 Posts

E55 amg

Number are accurate to dyno ject factors.Strong car my friend and you should see some nice gains on your mods.

Reply Like

10-25-2018, 11:05 PM

#11

failboat

Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: May 2018

Posts: 95

Likes: 3

Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

none yet

Quote:

Originally Posted by oneslow55

Number are accurate to dyno ject factors.Strong car my friend and you should see some nice gains on your mods.

thanks, the goal with the car was always to be able to keep up with the new stock biturbo cars, i’m confident I’ll get there with a good set of longtubes and a pulley

Reply Like

Reply Subscribe

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)