Tire Question

thanks
Nothing wrong with it, but you’re gonna have a hell of a time with traction and they might be stretched onto the wheel. I’m not familiar with over or undersized tires relative to the wheel but I’ve seen a lot of “ricers” with stretched tires and I’m sure it compromises the traction even further. I’d go 265+. I bought mine with 255/285’s and it’s been good.

thanks

https://tiresize.com/calculator/
NO, I want the same size tire on the front and rear. The rear look like low profile from the factory, it looks like they are the wrong tires. Has anyone gone to the same size tire on the front and rear (meaning used the larger size tires like the ones on the front) and had any problems? I'm not talking the width, I know 40 and 35 are not the same width, I am talking about the 265 or 245, the aspect ratio difference on the front and rear - IE, 265/35R18 or 245/40R18. I want 265/35R18 on the rear and 265/40R18 on the front . . .
Trending Topics
You can use this page to compare the three tires - 265/35R18 vs 265/40R18 vs 245/40R18.
With 245s recommended rim width is 8" - 9.5" whereas with 265s the recommended rim width is 9" - 10.5". If you're using the existing front wheels, you will also need to look at available space within the front wheel well/arch area and if you will either encounter any rubbing or possibly wheels end up protruding outside. With the latter, you will end up with more dirt and even scratches in the side skirt area.
Here is a comparison of just 265/35R18 vs 245/40R18:
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
35/40 is the aspect ratio, ie sidewall height ratio. 245/265 is the width. I feel like you are confusing the two. Try a 275/35 on the back. That will give you a touch more sidewall. Anything else is going to have some serious drawbacks.


thanks again for the feedback.






