W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Low dyno results, what went wrong?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-15-2023, 06:40 AM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
nd-photo.nl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,795
Received 461 Likes on 400 Posts
2005 CLS55 AMG W219 C219
Low dyno results, what went wrong?

Hello hello,

I went for a dynorun yesterday, but the results were way lower than expected. As I have some comparison material (other CLS55 drivers in my vicinity & own dragy measurements), I think they measured wrong. My own conclusion so far, is that they didn't account for a torque converter gearbox. What do you guys think?

Results: 457bhp / 717Nm at the crank

Extra relevant info:
My CLS55 is supposedly to be stage 1 tuned
Stock crank pulley
Stock supercharger pulley
Stock airboxes
Stock throttle body
Upgraded intercooler
Bosch 010 pump, rewired to run on ignition
Center resonator delete
Stock exhaust (headers, cats, mufflers)










Last edited by nd-photo.nl; 10-16-2023 at 11:00 AM.
Old 10-15-2023, 08:32 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SICAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,691
Received 356 Likes on 307 Posts
2005 e55 AMG
I think your right where you should be Nd....Considering Dyno differences,where you live and you have stock boost it looks pretty good to me.
You should have logged it as well to see what was going on but still those numbers seem about right.
Your next Dyno time when logging you can tune it by the spark plugs which is the ONLY way to correctly tune and get it right where it should be.
Old 10-15-2023, 08:38 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
black06c230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Usa
Posts: 1,953
Received 222 Likes on 176 Posts
mgLipGD
Agree 457hp and 528lb tq seems about right. I’m heavily modded and use meth making 564/666tq to the wheels.
Old 10-15-2023, 08:48 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
nd-photo.nl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,795
Received 461 Likes on 400 Posts
2005 CLS55 AMG W219 C219
Originally Posted by SICAMG
Your next Dyno time when logging you can tune it by the spark plugs which is the ONLY way to correctly tune and get it right where it should be.
What do you mean by this? Other plugs? Gapping?

@black06c230 Please note that the figures are engine horsepower/torque and not at the wheel (as the company told me).
Old 10-15-2023, 09:54 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SICAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,691
Received 356 Likes on 307 Posts
2005 e55 AMG
No no read the plugs after a pull. It can be done on the street but you have to have the space for a run and a place to install and remove a plug before and after a run. Dyno much easyer.
Old 10-15-2023, 02:40 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
nd-photo.nl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,795
Received 461 Likes on 400 Posts
2005 CLS55 AMG W219 C219
And one of those volcano inspector suits, it gets hot under the hood

Old 10-15-2023, 04:21 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
MJBelcher500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 372
Received 49 Likes on 45 Posts
2006 E55
Originally Posted by nd-photo.nl
Hello hello,

I went for a dynorun yesterday, but the results were way lower than expected. As I have some comparison material (other CLS55 drivers in my vicinity & own dragy measurements), I think they measured wrong. My own conclusion so far, is that they didn't account for a torque converter gearbox. What do you guys think?

Extra relevant info:
My CLS55 is supposedly to be stage 1 tuned
Stock crank pulley
Stock supercharger pulley
Stock airboxes
Stock throttle body
Upgraded intercooler
Bosch 010 pump, rewired to run on ignition
Center resonator delete
Stock exhaust (headers, cats, mufflers)









Here is a dyno chart from my completely stock E55 (back in 2006 when I had a brand new one) for reference.

Old 10-15-2023, 05:28 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SICAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,691
Received 356 Likes on 307 Posts
2005 e55 AMG
Reading the electrode will tell you where the timing is and reading the porcelen will tell you where the AFR is. Look on line ''youtube'' and you can see it.
Look up ''Reading Spark Plugs Steve Morris''

Last edited by SICAMG; 10-15-2023 at 05:34 PM.
The following users liked this post:
nd-photo.nl (10-15-2023)
Old 10-15-2023, 07:06 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
nd-photo.nl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,795
Received 461 Likes on 400 Posts
2005 CLS55 AMG W219 C219
Originally Posted by MJBelcher500
Here is a dyno chart from my completely stock E55 (back in 2006 when I had a brand new one) for reference.
Thanks for sharing! Is this crank power or wheel power?
Old 10-15-2023, 08:17 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SICAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,691
Received 356 Likes on 307 Posts
2005 e55 AMG
By the way that's a gorgeous car and shop!!
Old 10-16-2023, 04:20 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
nd-photo.nl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,795
Received 461 Likes on 400 Posts
2005 CLS55 AMG W219 C219
Thanks my man!

I was also jealous of that shop. Good amount of space, good equipment, clean workshop.
Old 10-16-2023, 08:47 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Sulaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: America
Posts: 2,361
Received 179 Likes on 146 Posts
1999 C43 AMG, 2005 E55 Wagon
I think someone misread the chart on this thread. It said max power to SHAFT was 458 but max power to WHEEL was 356hp. I agree that's way off. That's 20hp under stock. Either the car was heatsoaked, something is wrong with the car, or the dyno is wrong.
The following users liked this post:
nd-photo.nl (10-16-2023)
Old 10-16-2023, 10:35 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
MJBelcher500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 372
Received 49 Likes on 45 Posts
2006 E55
Originally Posted by nd-photo.nl
Thanks for sharing! Is this crank power or wheel power?
This is at the wheels.
Old 10-16-2023, 10:46 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
nd-photo.nl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,795
Received 461 Likes on 400 Posts
2005 CLS55 AMG W219 C219
Originally Posted by Sulaco
I think someone misread the chart on this thread. It said max power to SHAFT was 458 but max power to WHEEL was 356hp. I agree that's way off. That's 20hp under stock. Either the car was heatsoaked, something is wrong with the car, or the dyno is wrong.
Thank you, this is exactly what I want to point out.

Other people also pointed out that a test should've been done in lower gear.

Originally Posted by MJBelcher500
This is at the wheels.
Thanks for confirming! My results posted are supposedly at the crank...
Old 10-16-2023, 11:03 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
MJBelcher500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 372
Received 49 Likes on 45 Posts
2006 E55
I worked at Dynojet for over a decade, so I have some firsthand experience with dynos and dyno readings.

Dynos varied significantly from brand to brand. You really cannot compare numbers across brands. Even dynos of the same manufacture can vary depending on room design, temps, operator errors, etc. If you are going to use a dyno to evaluate changes, run the vehicle in stock form to establish a baseline. After that, use the same dyno to evaluate all future changes if you want data that can be compared. Otherwise, you are just guessing.

The following users liked this post:
nd-photo.nl (10-16-2023)
Old 10-16-2023, 11:54 AM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
radride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,507
Received 66 Likes on 52 Posts
2015 Challenger Hellcat, 2023 Ram 3500, 2005 E55 Wagon, 2019 GLC63s
Originally Posted by MJBelcher500
Here is a dyno chart from my completely stock E55 (back in 2006 when I had a brand new one) for reference.
Your result is at the wheels where his is at the crank. Either way, these cars make more power than AMG said they did.

R.K.
Old 10-16-2023, 12:41 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
nd-photo.nl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,795
Received 461 Likes on 400 Posts
2005 CLS55 AMG W219 C219
Originally Posted by MJBelcher500
I worked at Dynojet for over a decade, so I have some firsthand experience with dynos and dyno readings.

Dynos varied significantly from brand to brand. You really cannot compare numbers across brands. Even dynos of the same manufacture can vary depending on room design, temps, operator errors, etc. If you are going to use a dyno to evaluate changes, run the vehicle in stock form to establish a baseline. After that, use the same dyno to evaluate all future changes if you want data that can be compared. Otherwise, you are just guessing.
Thanks for this. I already know this, but its valuable information nonetheless for other people who might not know this.

I expect my measurement to be somewhat in the same ballpark, but my session seems way off, thats why created this thread If they would say: that measurement is at the wheels, then I would be happy haha
Old 10-16-2023, 01:22 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
MJBelcher500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 372
Received 49 Likes on 45 Posts
2006 E55
Originally Posted by nd-photo.nl
Thank you, this is exactly what I want to point out.

Other people also pointed out that a test should've been done in lower gear.



Thanks for confirming! My results posted are supposedly at the crank...
Most dyno shops that claim "power at the crank" are using a fixed factor to "calculate" it. There are ways to measure "negative power" during a coast down to come up with an approximation of driveline loses, but it is not a dead on number. Small things like tire pressure or how the car is strapped down will impact numbers. Airflow over the front of the car (the type of fan system used by the dyno shop) also changes things significantly. At the end of the day, it only matters what makes it to the tires.
The following 2 users liked this post by MJBelcher500:
nd-photo.nl (10-16-2023), UncleBenz55 (10-16-2023)
Old 10-16-2023, 03:06 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SICAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,691
Received 356 Likes on 307 Posts
2005 e55 AMG
You should have Dyno'd in 4rth gear as that's a 1to1 ratio.
The following 2 users liked this post by SICAMG:
nd-photo.nl (10-16-2023), UncleBenz55 (10-16-2023)
Old 10-16-2023, 04:05 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
UncleBenz55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Germany RLP
Posts: 368
Received 160 Likes on 98 Posts
W211 E220, W211 E55, W219 CLS 500
The numbers seem about right for our european dynos. 9s 100-200 on a CLS55 with a map also seems about right, i wouldn't worry too much about the power sheet. If you want to make sure, check your intake air temp under full load and fuel pressure under full load.
Mine has a 88mm pulley, headers, no pre cats, Kleemann cams, no bypass valve, 80mm CLK DTM trottle body and E63 exhaust and makes "only" 570hp crank and 750Nm


Old 10-16-2023, 06:25 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
nd-photo.nl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,795
Received 461 Likes on 400 Posts
2005 CLS55 AMG W219 C219
If I remember correctly, under full load (100-200) IATs were under 60 degrees Celsius. Somewhere low in the 50s.

Seems I have an excuse to log again pretty soon
Old 10-16-2023, 09:07 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SICAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,691
Received 356 Likes on 307 Posts
2005 e55 AMG
I log every hard pass I make. You have to know whats going on and its amazing how temperatures will make big swings in the results. Than again I live in a 25 degree to 95 degree area throughout the year.
I can make 1.5lb's more boost in cold weather than summer.
Old 10-16-2023, 09:20 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ArmoE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,028
Received 125 Likes on 95 Posts
2006 E55
Did you dyno in 4th? Does the operator know what he's doing?

OP - I presume your pump is up to date-- no blower shutting off etc.? As reference, I dyno'd 435 at the wheels when it was bone stock, 474rwhp with just an 83mm upper and box tune only. Sure, all dynos vary, maybe 20 one day, 5 the next day, but not like that. Those are low numbers, something is up...
Old 10-17-2023, 12:13 AM
  #24  
Member
 
Sandygear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
2004 e500
Originally Posted by SICAMG
I log every hard pass I make. You have to know whats going on and its amazing how temperatures will make big swings in the results. Than again I live in a 25 degree to 95 degree area throughout the year.
I can make 1.5lb's more boost in cold weather than summer.

How do you log the data? I have a foxwell nt510.
Old 10-17-2023, 04:28 AM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
nd-photo.nl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,795
Received 461 Likes on 400 Posts
2005 CLS55 AMG W219 C219
Originally Posted by ArmoE55
Did you dyno in 4th? Does the operator know what he's doing?

OP - I presume your pump is up to date-- no blower shutting off etc.? As reference, I dyno'd 435 at the wheels when it was bone stock, 474rwhp with just an 83mm upper and box tune only. Sure, all dynos vary, maybe 20 one day, 5 the next day, but not like that. Those are low numbers, something is up...
I only put the car in dyno mode and I just let them go to work. This was probably dyno'd in 5th gear? At this point I don't think they knew they could put it in manual mode.

Thanks for the extra insights @ArmoE55 !

Maybe answer the question from a different angle, how much power does a CLS55 need to do a 9.00 second 100-200mph pass?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Low dyno results, what went wrong?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 PM.