Any W211's in/near Boca Raton, FL want to make some easy $ against an M5??
Just PM me the time and place and I will be there.
here are 2 quick pics to "prove" he actually exists...i didn't get to look under the hood though
i have never met nor am i afiliated with this person in anyway nefore today....


Are you going to come out Thursday night as well??
Can you please set him straight?
Not like it will do him any good...I've already posted instrumented road tests which show the SL55 and E55 within a tenth of one another here, and showed that both Mercedes' specs *and* Motor Trend's tests have the CL55 and the E55 running the same times. Obviously, science is not his major!
Seriously, though: this information has been provided to him on numerous occasions, and he knows bloody well that a stock CL55 is going to ream him just as good as a stock E55 will, but is just denying the truth for two reasons:
1) he knows the E55 will blow him into the middle of next week.;
2) no CL55 owner who frequents this forum is from Boca Raton, so he knows he's safe to make this claim, as none are likely to show up.
So, if he shows up and gets his *ss reamed by the E55, he'll simply claim either that your E55 is a factory freak, and that the CL55's are waay slower than the E55's, test data be damned. Because, you see, his opinion and the opinion of a guy who doesn't own a supercharged AMG carry more weight than actual instrumented road tests from Road & Track, Motor Trend, and the German car mag Auto Motor und Sport.
Auto Motor und Sport just tested the brand spanking new E60 M5. Here are the results of how it compares to the SL55, which APK keeps insisting is oh so much slower than the E55:
0-xxx............SL55.......E60 M5
0 - 40 Km/h...1,4 s.......1,5 s
0 - 60 Km/h...2,2 s.......2,3 s
0 - 80 Km/h...3,1 s.......3,5 s
0 - 100 Km/h...4,3 s.....4,5 s
0 - 120 Km/h...5,6 s.....5,9 s
0 - 140 Km/h...7,1 s.....7,4 s
0 - 160 Km/h...9,4 s.....9,2 s
0 - 180 Km/h...11,2 s...11,6 s
0 - 200 Km/h...13,8 s...13,8 s
'ring lap time: 8'12"......8'13"
So, I'm sure when the E60 M5's finally hit the states, APK's E39 M5 will be right there with them!!

Last edited by Improviz; Dec 27, 2004 at 06:46 PM.
Can you please set him straight?

a. 12.1 @ 116 - stock with 1.9 short time on stock Continentals in 70 degree weather;
b. 12.0 @ 117 - only modifications K&N air filters and drag radials with a 1.8 short time (soft launch) in 65 degree weather. http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...slip-4783.html
It's my understanding that APK wants to run an 03 CL55, not my E55. I will be there on Thursday, but has anyone stepped up with a CL55.
BTW - APK, your car looks good in the posted photos.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

APK, dude give it up already! For crying out loud, you are defaming every M5 owner out there.
APK, dude give it up already! For crying out loud, you are defaming every M5 owner out there.
My point was that if you added the weight of the CL you should add the power as well
1) Motor Trend tested the E55 and CL55 within 0.01 seconds of each other in the 1/4 mile;
2) Road & Track tested the E55 within 0.1 seconds of each other in the 1/4 mile;
3) Mercedes' performance specs for both cars are 0.1 apart.
Explain it, APK. You've been "feeling" this for some time, despite all evidence produced to show how wrong you are.
Why is it that you feel that the magazines are "wrong", but you are "right"?
Please answer, because your constant repetition of this nonsense without backing it up is getting tiresome.
Last edited by Improviz; Dec 27, 2004 at 09:36 PM.
Bottom line is, he's been stalling for some time now...perhaps for good reason!!
Bottom line is, he's been stalling for some time now...perhaps for good reason!!
OK, so I am not paranoid. Good to know.
I have been scanning the M5 board and don't think you will even touch my Auto C6 with Z51 axle. I run consistant 12.5's.
Look at these time from an M5.
1999 BMW E39 M5
Stock (with only AA Intakes)
1/4 mile = 13.032 secs. at 104 mph
After mods (AA, CAI, SS Exhaust & Xpipe, PC Software, SSK, VPfuel)
1/4 mile = 12.788 ses. at 113 mph
What you need is a supercharger mate. I'll see you in Thursday with my C6.
You keep making this baseless claim, yet refuse to back it up. Do you actually think anyone here is dumb enough to believe it? Clearly, this is nothing more than a weak face-saving maneuver, as is your silly claim that when (not if) SGC smokes you, it won't be the same as running with a CL55.
A CL55 weighs 180 pounds more. If SGC runs you with one passenger, this would be the same race.
If you have any sound reason why a CL55 would be any slower than an E55 with one passenger (and this ignores the FACT that Mercedes rates the CL55 at 493 horsepower, as compared to the 469 they rate the E55), please state it. Why?
And why do you keep dodging this question? Answer it.




