CLS 63 hp????
I am not happy about this!
High-Performance CLS63 AMG Four-Door Coupe
Center stage at the L.A. Show, the all-new 2012 CLS63 AMG will be powered by a new 5.5-liter biturbo V8 that produces more power and better fuel economy. With twin turbochargers, direct fuel injection and multi-spark ignition, the new AMG engine will produce 518 horsepower and 516 lb.-ft. of torque. The new CLS63 AMG will also come with AMG's award-winning MCT (for multi-clutch technology) transmission and innovative systems designed to reduce fuel consumption. For even more performance, the CLS63 AMG will be available with an optional Performance Package that includes increased power - 550 hp and 590 lb.-ft. of torque.
With fresh body lines that accentuate the distinctive shape of the swoopy four-door coupe, the new-generation CLS-Class represents the first major redesign of a car that established an entirely new market segment - the four-door coupe. Defining yet another market segment in an ever-expanding and highly competitive auto industry, the CLS was the first four-door vehicle to combine the emotional appeal and dynamic design of a coupe with the comfort and functionality of a four-door sedan.
The Fuel-Cell-Powered F-CELL
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...U3D0E_pOlL1GQw
It looks like MB is providing engines with different tunes between the S/CL classes and the rest of the line-up. The "regular" 2012 CLS550 has 402 hp and 443 ft vs the 2011 CL550 having 429 hp and 519 ft. You see a similar gap on the AMG versions of the 5.5TTv8 both with and without the performance pack.
I will be curious to see if that is just a ratings game to support the stratospheric price of the CL/S-class or whether those are real world differences. I would have thought they are paper differences but that seems to be too huge a torque difference to "make up".
By the way, there is a great article in Motortrend today about the passing of the torch from the 6.2V8 to the new 5.5TTV8. If the author is right about the sound of the 5.5TTV8 being lacking relative to the 6.2V8, that will be a shame. I would not trade the sound of my 6.2V8 for even an extra 50 fl-lbs of torque as I enjoy that sound every time a fire up the car and tool around town - fast or slow. It is a sound my old E55 never had - and man would I not want to give that up.
It looks like MB is providing engines with different tunes between the S/CL classes and the rest of the line-up. The "regular" 2012 CLS550 has 402 hp and 443 ft vs the 2011 CL550 having 429 hp and 519 ft. You see a similar gap on the AMG versions of the 5.5TTv8 both with and without the performance pack.
I will be curious to see if that is just a ratings game to support the stratospheric price of the CL/S-class or whether those are real world differences. I would have thought they are paper differences but that seems to be too huge a torque difference to "make up".
By the way, there is a great article in Motortrend today about the passing of the torch from the 6.2V8 to the new 5.5TTV8. If the author is right about the sound of the 5.5TTV8 being lacking relative to the 6.2V8, that will be a shame. I would not trade the sound of my 6.2V8 for even an extra 50 fl-lbs of torque as I enjoy that sound every time a fire up the car and tool around town - fast or slow. It is a sound my old E55 never had - and man would I not want to give that up.




MB apparently decided to de-tune the engine so the S63/CL63 still have a little bit of advantage for marketing purposes.
I bet though,if you put on a dyno both CLS and S63,both will show similar rear wheel hp readouts,regardless of what the brochure says.....
I am sure you are right - the new engine will be great, just like all current and past AMG engines. In fact, I can't think of any AMG engine I wouldn't have loved to own over the years. I guess that is why so many of us on the Forum are repeat AMG owners. . .
Trending Topics

I like the color
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Still, I've been reading the higher numbers as well, so time will tell.
I could see that if Mercedes had to "spend more" to make the engine stronger, like the P31 Package on the C63 where they have reworked the internals to bump the horsepower to 481, then an "up" charge would be warranted. But here I would think the cost to Mercedes is the same. Yes, we have the P30 option currently on the E63, but I think of that more as making the car more track ready then anything else (although I admit it is not clear cut on that example either).
I guess one answer would be to buy the "base" engine and have the car tuned for $2k by shops like Speedriven and match the performance gains of the performance pack . . .
Am I off base here???
but you have to take into account other benefits of the performance package like LSD, red brakes(i think there better), carbon fiber goodies, and hey maybe they brought back the suspension changes? but again these can all be possibly obtained for less than what the performance package costs
also there are people out there that do not like modifying their cars due to warranty issues that may arise, and the performance package may be right for them
"As the pioneer of the four-door coupé automotive segment, the all new Mercedes-Benz CLS 63 AMG definitively confirms its place as the ultimate vehicle of its kind. This top-of-the-range version of the CLS equipped with the newly developed AMG V8 biturbo engine, featuring a toe curling peak output of up to 410 kW (557 hp) and 800 Nm of torque, as well as the AMG SPEEDSHIFT MCT 7-speed sports transmission, allowing this masterpiece to feel equally at home on the racetrack as well as the on-ramp. Not to be ignored are fuel consumption improvements of 32 percent and stylistic updates that distinctly identify this as a true original.
An all new captivating design, ground-breaking efficiency, and all new innovative performance: in any setting, the CLS 63 AMG aims to be the Object of your Desire."





