Notices
W212 AMG Discuss the W212 AMG's such as the E63

2013 M5 dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2014 | 08:47 PM
  #1  
JumpinJim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 659
Likes: 1
From: Dallas, TX
SL63
2013 M5 dyno

I've had my M5 since last July but never bothered to dyno it. Today there was a dyno day so I figured why not. I was expecting 520 or so rwhp. It's stock with charcoal delete. Drove it off the road and straight onto the dyno. No cooldown. When someone yelled 560 rwhp I thought they were pulling my leg. I had to go look, but there it was. 511 tq too. Must be a factory freak. Makes sense though as it'll outrun my SL63 and it put down 519 rwhp stock and the M5 is 300lbs heavier.

A tuned C63 put down 411 rwhp and a '12 CLS 63 did 502 rwhp same day today.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2014 | 10:07 PM
  #2  
JumpinJim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 659
Likes: 1
From: Dallas, TX
SL63
And here's the dyno graph of all 3 cars.
Attached Thumbnails 2013 M5 dyno-dyno-day.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2014 | 10:45 PM
  #3  
HPMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 418
Likes: 44
From: Vancouver, BC
2014 E63 S
Okay. Not use why this warrants a post...
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2014 | 10:49 AM
  #4  
usamuscle's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 218
Likes: 1
2014 E550
Good numbers but there is no such thing as a factory freak. All dynos are different and while I have no doubts the m5 is super strong , no such thing as factory freaks. These cars/engines are all certified , so the hp should be all around each other
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2014 | 11:37 AM
  #5  
sunil517's Avatar
Super Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 746
Likes: 48
From: Queens,NYC
2014 E63s 1993 mazda rx7 on Boost
560 is alot for a stocker

No Tune No headers intake NOS...560 WHP
my e63NA make 467Whp with Headers + full exhauste- tune and intake..
same day a C63 made 415 stock with tune...so my added equal +50..
what Dynojet
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2014 | 12:59 PM
  #6  
dr. ss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 323
Likes: 3
From: Chicago, Illinois
'11 911 Turbo S, '15 HELLCAT, '07 Escalade, '15 Sienna
Originally Posted by usamuscle
Good numbers but there is no such thing as a factory freak. All dynos are different and while I have no doubts the m5 is super strong , no such thing as factory freaks. These cars/engines are all certified , so the hp should be all around each other
100% agreed.

My car made 541 to all 4 wheels and 579 tq to all 4 wheels stock -- dynojet.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2014 | 01:54 PM
  #7  
xtyper's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
2013 E63 AMG
Actually 560whp on a Dynojet is very average for the F10 M5. It's well known that these cars are underrated by the factory, and I've actually seen several dyno higher than that in stock trim at local dyno days.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2014 | 10:04 PM
  #8  
Vic55's Avatar
Administrator
MBWorld Ambassador

20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 12,251
Likes: 890
From: THE Orange County, California
2024 C8 Z06- 2025 BMW CS- 2022 Porsche 992 GTS
Originally Posted by xtyper
Actually 560whp on a Dynojet is very average for the F10 M5. It's well known that these cars are underrated by the factory, and I've actually seen several dyno higher than that in stock trim at local dyno days.


You and I both know this cause we have used the EAS Dynojet a lot... My M5 made great power on a DJ along with my M6, both in stock format. Too bad neither car had any bark to match its bite LOL.


Jim your car is fast but your trap speeds vs the SL at the track is the another/best indicator of power. Didn't your M5 trap around 119 vs the SL at 118? I cant remember....
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2014 | 11:25 PM
  #9  
JumpinJim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 659
Likes: 1
From: Dallas, TX
SL63
Originally Posted by Vic55
You and I both know this cause we have used the EAS Dynojet a lot... My M5 made great power on a DJ along with my M6, both in stock format. Too bad neither car had any bark to match its bite LOL.


Jim your car is fast but your trap speeds vs the SL at the track is the another/best indicator of power. Didn't your M5 trap around 119 vs the SL at 118? I cant remember....


Yep, that's correct. It would really be something if it wasn't such a fat car. Sadly, they all seem to be headed in that direction.


I thought the typical M5 put down 520-530 on a dynojet. That's why I was shocked by the 560 figure. I almost never visit the BMW forums so maybe I'm mistaken.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 AM.