W212 AMG Discuss the W212 AMG's such as the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What made you choose E63 over Panamera Turbo , RS7 or M5?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-27-2015, 11:48 AM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
viren.89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,242
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 E55 AMG
What made you choose E63 over Panamera Turbo , RS7 or M5?

Hello,

Other than the price - what made you come this route?

I may or may not be looking for a car was wanting to hear your

opinions? I drive an 04 E55 AMG and knock on wood - zero complaints -even gas mileage is good lol

but if you had 100-200k cash - wouldn't you like to go in an uncharted territory of a car that handles good and is good in quarter mile too ?

Now we got AWD but in past we didn't .

and oh 2016 March 2nd Gen Porsche Panamera coming out

Opinions ?
Old 10-27-2015, 12:28 PM
  #2  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,412
Received 1,886 Likes on 1,323 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
E63S - great looks and awd and performance stats and it's a Benz, acquisition price much less compared to other cars

Porsche - fuuuugly

M5 - no awd, no go for me in Midwest (Chicago)

Rs7 - overpriced and Audi reliability and don't "feel" the looks of a four door coupe... Same reason I didn't get cls63S

Good luck
Old 10-27-2015, 12:33 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
viren.89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,242
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
E63S - great looks and awd and performance stats and it's a Benz, acquisition price much less compared to other cars

Porsche - fuuuugly

M5 - no awd, no go for me in Midwest (Chicago)

Rs7 - overpriced and Audi reliability and don't "feel" the looks of a four door coupe... Same reason I didn't get cls63S

Good luck
Audi reliability ?

Porsche - lol to be honest - I really don't mind the looks whatsoever. Performance wise Porsche isn't behind AMG especially the Turbo model or am I missing something?
Old 10-27-2015, 01:10 PM
  #4  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,412
Received 1,886 Likes on 1,323 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Originally Posted by viren.89
Audi reliability ?

Porsche - lol to be honest - I really don't mind the looks whatsoever. Performance wise Porsche isn't behind AMG especially the Turbo model or am I missing something?
You started a thread to ask for peoples opinions, I stated my opinion. If my opinion contrasts with yours, so be it. I don't like how the Porsche looks. I'm glad you like it. If you think the Porsche performs better, that's great too perhaps you just found your new car!

My experience with Audi and the pulse from people that I know who have had Audi suggests in a non-scientific way that they are less reliable than Mercedes. That being said this may once again be in contrast to your opinion, you did ask for peoples opinions.
Old 10-27-2015, 01:29 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
ringkingpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NW Indiana, southern tip of Lake Michigan
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2014 e63, 2012 Callaway Yukon XL Denali, 1971 BMW 2002, 1968 280se, 1961 T-Bird Convertible
I like the fit, finish, styling and power of the e63. To me, it's somewhat understated and can still be classified as a "sleeper."

The Porsche is a monstrosity and I'm a Porsche fan. You could have made an uglier car but you'd need a think tank of MIT professors to figure out exactly HOW.

The M5 isn't as powerful and the absolutely horrid, video game (not even mic'ed like the caddy and other cars) sound effects being piped in to the cockpit was a deal breaker, 100%.

The Audi I don't like the looks of and not enough bang for the buck for me.
Old 10-27-2015, 01:41 PM
  #6  
Member
 
ProfessorX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 132
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2012 E63 Tuned, 2020 Shelby GT350, 1999 S 420
I always have looked at the ultimate performance sedans to be either the M5 or the E AMG. However, I stopped liking the exterior of the BMW M5 after the E39 body style changed. This really wasn't a problem because the very next year the E W211 body style came out and I just thought it was so much better looking than the M5. When I test drove them the E 63 it was also larger vehicle than the M5 and I have 2 kids in high school so the space was much better. My wife has a 2013 BMW 5 series and the my E Class is much more spacious. I'm 6'4" and my E63 is the first car that I've ever had that I can drive comfortably and not have to move the seat all the way back. For me the head room in the Panamera isn't high enough and I must be one of the few people that thinks the Audi looks ugly.

Yet in the end, I am old school and still believe that the ultimate performance sedan is a competition between the M5 and E AMG. Audi, Panamera, CTS-V etc....may be great cars but they aren't for me. I'm the same way about bikes... Folks tell me that Triumphs are great bikes but they would never replace my Harley. Guess I'm just nostalgic.
Old 10-27-2015, 01:44 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
ringkingpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NW Indiana, southern tip of Lake Michigan
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2014 e63, 2012 Callaway Yukon XL Denali, 1971 BMW 2002, 1968 280se, 1961 T-Bird Convertible
Originally Posted by ProfessorX
I always have looked at the ultimate performance sedans to be either the M5 or the E AMG. However, I stopped liking the exterior of the BMW M5 after the E39 body style changed. This really wasn't a problem because the very next year the E W211 body style came out and I just thought it was so much better looking than the M5. When I test drove them the E 63 it was also larger vehicle than the M5 and I have 2 kids in high school so the space was much better. My wife has a 2013 BMW 5 series and the my E Class is much more spacious. I'm 6'4" and my E63 is the first car that I've ever had that I can drive comfortably and not have to move the seat all the way back. For me the head room in the Panamera isn't high enough and I must be one of the few people that thinks the Audi looks ugly.

Yet in the end, I am old school and still believe that the ultimate performance sedan is a competition between the M5 and E AMG. Audi, Panamera, CTS-V etc....may be great cars but they aren't for me. I'm the same way about bikes... Folks tell me that Triumphs are great bikes but they would never replace my Harley. Guess I'm just nostalgic.

Short thread hi-jack, what if the Triumph is older than the Harley?
Old 10-27-2015, 01:54 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Davidkuo0330's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
2016 AMG S65, AMG GL63, 2012 AMG E63 With AMS Alpha 9 Package, Renntech 200 Catted Downpipes.
Honestly. If you are asking which cars owners on a W212 E63 forum, most likely you will get a consistent answer. I went from a M3 to M6 and now the E63 and S65 and will never look back.

Audi was never in my vocabulary and 2 door Porsches is all I would consider, but that wouldn't happen until my daughter ( 8 now ) is driving on her own and the wife and I can have weekend mini vacation time by ourselves.

I'm sure you will get different reviews from Audi and Porsche forums though.
Old 10-27-2015, 02:30 PM
  #9  
Super Member
 
looney100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 746
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
None
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
E63S - great looks and awd and performance stats and it's a Benz, acquisition price much less compared to other cars

Porsche - fuuuugly

M5 - no awd, no go for me in Midwest (Chicago)

Rs7 - overpriced and Audi reliability and don't "feel" the looks of a four door coupe... Same reason I didn't get cls63S

Good luck
Peter beat me to it! Panamera is ugly and overpriced. M5 doesn't have AWD until 2017 - a must for Canadian winters. RS7 exterior styling doesn't appeal to me, but the interior is gorgeous. RS7 is a little pricey.
Old 10-27-2015, 03:00 PM
  #10  
Member
 
ProfessorX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 132
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2012 E63 Tuned, 2020 Shelby GT350, 1999 S 420
Originally Posted by ringkingpin
Short thread hi-jack, what if the Triumph is older than the Harley?
Funny! I guess I'd be confused...
Old 10-27-2015, 03:10 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
amgcl55s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cls55
M5 and Audi are too feminine I feel. Once you have driven AMG's and feel the torque and sound, the other two just seem cute to me.

Panamera is an abortion IMO, could never look at that in my drive way and be happy.

To each his own, just think about it and decide whats right for you, then go buy the AMG.
Old 10-27-2015, 04:37 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
homeofstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Athens, GA USA
Posts: 1,084
Received 68 Likes on 55 Posts
2011 E63, 2011 Hyundai Genesis 4.6 v8, 2013 GMC Denali XL, 1965 Ford Mustang, 2005 Merc. E500
answer: Its a Mercedes and the others aren't.
Old 10-27-2015, 08:33 PM
  #13  
Member
 
herpderp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 171
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
2005 sl55
I swapped from a 2014 RS7 to a 2016 E63 S 4matic.

The audi was a very nice car. The feature I miss the most was the automatic door closer. The RS7 was really enjoyable to drive, and had gobs of torque for a 4L motor. The sound was also intoxicating.

I switched to the merc cause I was bored of the RS and there was an issue with the heat that the dealer was unable to fix. I was doing donuts in the snow once in the audi, and managed to blow out the blower motor. I was really disappointed in the audi when it did this. As a Canadian, doing donuts in the snow is a regular pastime in the winter.

I'm quite happy with my e63, and now with a remote starter and catless downpipes its just about the perfect machine. Gonna wait for my first oil change or summer to do the ECU tune.

I was considering a 911 turbo S for a while, but porsche wants way too much for too little. I drove a 997.2 and wasn't at all impressed.
Old 10-27-2015, 09:00 PM
  #14  
Member
 
IGotId's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 132
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
'18 E63s
Easy, wanted a ridiculous wagon: CTS-V is getting long in the tooth & the back seat is a little tight. RS4/6 not available in the US or it would have been a very tough decision!

(BTW, this is my 1st MB after 5 Bimmers, two of which were M's)
Old 10-27-2015, 09:28 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rory breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 1,675
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Yes
M5 - wasn't interested. Massage seats not real. Drove great though, loved HUD. Not as brutal as E63. Felt big inside. Piped exhaust was lame. No pano, or is my memory off?

Rs7 - price, period. Lack of ac seats was weak but I could have gotten over that. Simply not worth the money, no way is it that much of a premium over the E.

Panamera - price, would always kick myself that it wasn't worth the premium, would be thinking about the E.
Old 10-27-2015, 11:30 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
vdubpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: OC
Posts: 6,255
Received 53 Likes on 41 Posts
i drive them all, fast and hard
too expensive
wasnt out -- ugly VW
its a beemer - nuff said
Old 10-28-2015, 01:47 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
megasaurus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2016 E63 AMG S SEDAN, 2010 E550 SEDAN
E63 no questions
Old 10-28-2015, 03:23 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
SilveRT8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 317
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
'19 GLC 63S, '17 911 TTS Cabrio, '16 Viper TA2.0, '15 E63S (sold),'12 Harley CVO 2212cc
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
E63S - great looks and awd and performance stats and it's a Benz, acquisition price much less compared to other cars

Porsche - fuuuugly

M5 - no awd, no go for me in Midwest (Chicago)

Rs7 - overpriced and Audi reliability and don't "feel" the looks of a four door coupe... Same reason I didn't get cls63S

Good luck

Same as Peter, but for me it really came down to RS7 vs E63S.
After test driving the 2, my giggle meeter was much higher in the E with more brutish power and sound. On the practical side, better headroom for backseat, and much more under the floor storage space in the trunk. I did not want my small carry-on stuff, like windshield washer jug, emergency, winter and cleaning kits to be flying around in the trunk in plain sight in the RS7. For the same money I was able to order the E63S with Carbon Ceramik brakes and Designo interior. Also for bragging rights and performance modding, having a 5.5L engine is better than 4.0L.
Old 10-28-2015, 12:31 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
otakki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,463
Received 54 Likes on 50 Posts
FF. W212 E63 M156 non-pano 18" P2 ParkT NightV (gone but will be missed).
Safety is 1st for me. So after combing through large amount of datas numbers on iihs, nhtsa, and various continents' ncap programs, E class is the one for me.
Old 10-28-2015, 02:59 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rediesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,365
Received 57 Likes on 46 Posts
2006 E320 CDI 2014 C63 507 Coupe 2012 E550 4M 2016 E63s Wagon
Cargo room obviously.
Old 10-28-2015, 07:48 PM
  #21  
Member
 
LFC09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 182
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
E63 AMG S Diamond White Saloon
M5 or E63S (RWD) drove them back to back before deciding. Previous car was the E39 M5.

F10 M5 had no soul, fake exhaust, and didn't look like a brutal beast of a car.
The E63S, whilst about 20K dearer, won all those comparos hands down.
Old 10-29-2015, 07:11 AM
  #22  
Junior Member
 
Armen383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 27
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2017 Mercedes AMG GTR
I'm still not sure what looks uglier - Porsche Panamera or Nissan Juke.
BMW M5 - I've had enough with BMWs for now (lately had a horrific experience with F15 M50d). And the exhaust note is just meh; car doesn't feel beastly special.
Audi - I'd rather take RS6 over RS7, but the fact that it's AWD would make it very boring for me.

E63S RWD (yeap, those of us with RHD are still lucky to have those) - this car deliveres emotions on another level, and that's all I need from a car lately - no tech gismos or luxury can outweigh that. Only thing I really miss on the Merc sometimes is the HUD from the bimmer - especially on higher speeds.
Old 10-30-2015, 09:48 AM
  #23  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,412
Received 1,886 Likes on 1,323 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Glad I'm not the only one that thinks the panamera is ugly

Man... What a fail by porsche
Old 10-30-2015, 02:52 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
durask's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Near Worcester MA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2016 E63 AMG S, 2018 C300 cabrio
I looked at Audi S6 and I drove Audis for 12 years before that and I liked it but E63 was more powerful, liked the handling better and E63 had inflatable seat bolsters. Yes I liked them that much, LOL.

M5 - no AWD - as such - no go (I live in New England).

Cadillac CTS-V - again, no AWD, no go. I actually like the new CTS-V quite a bit. Handles extremely well IMHO.

Porsche - don't like the design, dealership is extremely far.

Also considered Tesla P85D and liked it, but the interior is too cheap for the price they are asking. For me the final choice was between Tesla and E63 and E63 felt like more car for similar money.

Last edited by durask; 10-30-2015 at 02:56 PM.
Old 11-05-2015, 09:45 PM
  #25  
Super Member
 
mysticblu999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ky
Posts: 608
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
Mercedes AMG
Never considered anything other than Mercedes.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: What made you choose E63 over Panamera Turbo , RS7 or M5?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:00 AM.