E63S Dyno Tuned at Powerhaus Performance



Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

generally Dyno Dynamics and mustang dynos are pretty close and both heartbreakers compared to dynojets but in reality dyno comparison is only really good when its same car, same dyno, same inputs to compare changes from changes made to car
http://www.superstreetonline.com/how...no-comparison/
Dyno Dash Round-up (SAE J1349)
Fame Mustang 292.7
Pina Dyno Dynamics 318.6
Drift-Office Dynojet 312.5
Speed Factory Dynapack 324.4
English Racing Dynojet 315.9
Last edited by gaspam; Apr 5, 2016 at 01:37 PM.
generally Dyno Dynamics and mustang dynos are pretty close and both heartbreakers compared to dynojets but in reality dyno comparison is only really good when its same car, same dyno, same inputs to compare changes from changes made to car
http://www.superstreetonline.com/how...no-comparison/
Dyno Dash Round-up (SAE J1349)
Fame Mustang 292.7
Pina Dyno Dynamics 318.6
Drift-Office Dynojet 312.5
Speed Factory Dynapack 324.4
English Racing Dynojet 315.9
Last edited by kponti; Apr 5, 2016 at 01:41 PM.
I gotta say that is a real nice cluster of numbers, very very close indeed! I am actually impressed. Not what I experienced when I dynoed my mustang some years back between 3 different shops


the previous naming was performance package or 030 or something along those lines, but there was never a badge to state it, like the S

thats one of the reason you dont see any 9 sec M157's yet even though there are a few at 800+whp
the trq limits seem to be able to be removed, but only on a custom basis from your tuner when you get a turbo/tranny upgrade from GAD, weistec or renntech and havent seen anyone on the forum with those except occasionally vasily w/ his GAD custom tuned e63s

thats one of the reason you dont see any 9 sec M157's yet even though there are a few at 800+whp
the trq limits seem to be able to be removed, but only on a custom basis from your tuner when you get a turbo/tranny upgrade from GAD, weistec or renntech and havent seen anyone on the forum with those except occasionally vasily w/ his GAD custom tuned e63s
My assumption is because our cars are fixed at a 1/3 of the power/torque going to the front wheels, the front driveshaft may not be able to support the extra torque? This is the same issue that a lot of heavily modded GT-Rs go through. The difference that benefits the GT-R in that matter is that by the time the car gets to it's peak torque, it shifts 90%+ of it to the rear wheels.

We were talking about my friend's tuned CLS63 (that was tuned by a different company) and I was asking this tuner if my car would be able to keep up with my friends' with his tune and this is what he told me:
"you cannot compare the AWD 63’s to the RWD 63’s. The AWD’s will be missing about 100 TRQ…. No matter who tunes it."
We were talking about my friend's tuned CLS63 (that was tuned by a different company) and I was asking this tuner if my car would be able to keep up with my friends' with his tune and this is what he told me:
"you cannot compare the AWD 63’s to the RWD 63’s. The AWD’s will be missing about 100 TRQ…. No matter who tunes it."

there is a good article on this on benz boost with lots of dyno's... AWD and RWD dyno same.... only advantage RWD has is above 100 mph due to driveline efficiency, not due to +100 torque
also here is tune/dp AWD m157 running 10.85 @ 129
http://dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Benz-C...lip-23728.html
and for fair comparison tune/dp RWD m157 10.90@ 128
http://dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Benz-C...lip-23728.html
awd and rwd seem pretty equal to me, definitely doesnt look like +100 trq on the rwd
Last edited by gaspam; Apr 7, 2016 at 12:12 PM.
Edit: yup, slicks. http://youtu.be/qCv1YQMJWHU
Also don't forget the AWD models have some minor changes to the engine as well (additional intercooler heat exchanger, isolated intercooler cooling circuit)
Last edited by JoeNobody; Apr 8, 2016 at 02:56 AM.







