W212 AMG Discuss the W212 AMG's such as the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

W4 turbos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-20-2017, 01:10 PM
  #101  
Member
 
notatroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG or M
Originally Posted by gaspam
i think the part of the launch that you are missing the point on is the 1/2 second pause the M157 MCT trans has off the line.... e63tt mash pedal.. trans waits .5 sec... then goes

at that point e63tt is playing catchup to other car

all the 0-60 mph times you see, dont take into account for that trans pause since they use a 1 foot rollout and dont start timing until the car has actually moved more than a foot..... so whatever the actual "lag/pause" time of the MCT trans is, needs to be added to the 0-60mph time to get its realworld 0-60 mph time

no way our cars are doing anywhere close to 2.8 sec 0-60....audi r8 plus does 0-60 in 2.7 sec and i raced one a few weekends back from a stop and it wasnt even funny... he put 2 car lengths on me almost immediately from the start and i tried both brake torquing and just mashing pedal with both results the same (him launching hard while my car paused and then went)......so no way we are even close to 2.8 sec in tuned/dp form
Originally Posted by chiromikey
Bottom line...for the power, awd, and it's specs on paper, relatively speaking, this platform is about the worst performing car when it comes to launching...period!
Originally Posted by chiromikey
I've seen 1 or 2 rare high 1.6 60ft times from the m157 awd platform on tires but it's the exception and not the rule! I call bs on any "claims" faster than that I don't care what some dash box says!
Agreeded. Once the car starts moving it goes like a freight train. The problem is that pause when mash the pedal to the floor. By the time the car reacts, everything else next to you is already ahead and moving
Old 04-20-2017, 02:50 PM
  #102  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaspam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 201 Likes on 154 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
Originally Posted by notatroll
Agreeded. Once the car starts moving it goes like a freight train. The problem is that pause when mash the pedal to the floor. By the time the car reacts, everything else next to you is already ahead and moving
Exactly! the M157 engine has amazing low down pull/trq... its just the lazy trans initial response that really lets our car down
Old 04-20-2017, 02:54 PM
  #103  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaspam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 201 Likes on 154 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
Originally Posted by efiftyfizzle
I don't believe the 2.8 0-60 one bit... here's some 60' to 0-60 calculator (approximate) I found on another forum:

2.3 second 60' time = 35.5 mph @60' = 7.0 second 0-60 time
2.2 second 60' time = 37.1 mph @60' = 6.5 second 0-60 time
2.1 second 60' time = 38.9 mph @60' = 5.9 second 0-60 time
2.0 second 60' time = 40.9 mph @60' = 5.2 second 0-60 time
1.9 second 60' time = 43.0 mph @60' = 4.6 second 0-60 time
1.8 second 60' time = 45.5 mph @60' = 4.0 second 0-60 time
1.7 second 60' time = 48.1 mph @60' = 3.4 second 0-60 time
1.6 second 60' time = 51.1 mph @60' = 2.9 second 0-60 time
1.5 second 60' time = 54.5 mph @60' = 2.2 second 0-60 time
1.4 second 60' time = 58.4 mph @60' = 1.5 second 0-60 time
1.36 second 60' time = 60.0 mph @60' = 1.36 second 0-60 time
1.3 second 60' time = 62.9 mph @60' = 1.2 second 0-60 time
1.2 second 60' time = 68.1 mph @60' = 1.1 second 0-60 time
1.1 second 60' time = 74.3 mph @60' = 0.9 second 0-60 time
1.0 second 60' time = 81.8 mph @60' = 0.7 second 0-60 time

I haven't really seen anyone cutting better than a 1.7 60' time which is mid 3 second 0-60 for the E63S. In comparison, stock RS7 are pulling 1.6 60' times which is high 2/low 3 second for 0-60.
i agree and most of the M157's ive seen on here are cutting 1.8's so 4 sec 0-60mph according to your numbers which i tend to agree is the real 0-60 mph number for tuned M157's
Old 04-20-2017, 05:48 PM
  #104  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaspam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 201 Likes on 154 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
just saw on IG the W4 car that is down here just dyno'd at 767 whp and 764 wtrq on 93 oct..... kinda lower than what i would expect since weistec supposedly got 856 whp on 91 oct .... who knows, maybe they turned it down on this car to protect the trans, although really doesnt make sense as the trq down low (where its more likely to damage trans) is higher on tuned stock turbos vs these so dont really see the point if that is their logic to turn it down

View this post on Instagram

Last edited by gaspam; 04-20-2017 at 06:11 PM.
Old 04-20-2017, 05:52 PM
  #105  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chiromikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Received 207 Likes on 157 Posts
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
A LOT lower than I expected, especially on meth.
Old 04-20-2017, 05:55 PM
  #106  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaspam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 201 Likes on 154 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
yeah especially since the pure turbo cars up in jersey are making 840+ and they got the ams kit to put out 750+whp
Old 04-20-2017, 05:58 PM
  #107  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chiromikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Received 207 Likes on 157 Posts
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
They were hunting for 1000hp so they have some work to do...
Old 04-20-2017, 06:05 PM
  #108  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CarHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 6,307
Received 846 Likes on 594 Posts
E63S | X5
That's stock turbo torque.

But, we've been over it time and time again. The power isn't the issue, the nannies are. Maybe if someone put time into the nannies before the dyno numbers we could actually get somewhere.
Old 04-20-2017, 06:17 PM
  #109  
Member
 
notatroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG or M
When was the weistec stage 4 released? Like 3 months ago? Why havent we got any performance data yet? Dyno numbers is only a first step. They are located in the sunny CA. So the weather shouldnt be a problem for them unlike the guys in the East coast who seem to try and do more for this platform.
Old 04-20-2017, 06:45 PM
  #110  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaspam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 201 Likes on 154 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
Originally Posted by notatroll
When was the weistec stage 4 released? Like 3 months ago? Why havent we got any performance data yet? Dyno numbers is only a first step. They are located in the sunny CA. So the weather shouldnt be a problem for them unlike the guys in the East coast who seem to try and do more for this platform.
see post 39 in this thread... I posted a 60-130 vbox that they provided on another site

i also saw they ran 165 mph in 1/2 at shiftsector CA a few months ago as well after they posted their first 840 WHP instagram dyno teaser vid
Old 04-20-2017, 07:31 PM
  #111  
Member
 
notatroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG or M
Originally Posted by gaspam
see post 39 in this thread... I posted a 60-130 vbox that they provided on another site

i also saw they ran 165 mph in 1/2 at shiftsector CA a few months ago as well after they posted their first 840 WHP instagram dyno teaser vid
Stage 1 pure turbo m5s are running equal number if Im not mistaking.
Old 04-20-2017, 07:49 PM
  #112  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaspam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 201 Likes on 154 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
Originally Posted by notatroll
Stage 1 pure turbo m5s are running equal number if Im not mistaking.
actually they are faster... 60-130 = 5.6 and 170 mph 1/2

http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1253027
Old 04-20-2017, 09:34 PM
  #113  
Member
 
notatroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG or M
Originally Posted by gaspam
actually they are faster... 60-130 = 5.6 and 170 mph 1/2

http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1253027
Love it. Even though he is the only one to get there, that doesnt take away the fact that he did it! As far as I know he holds the record for 1/4 mile, 1/2 mile and 60-130 mph acceleration. Couple guys have tried with m157 but failed unfortunately. Thats mercedes for you.
Old 04-20-2017, 09:46 PM
  #114  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,412
Received 1,886 Likes on 1,323 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
F it, lol!

im buying the new awd m5

hopefully it'll look better than the current g30 m550i
Old 04-20-2017, 10:00 PM
  #115  
Member
 
notatroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG or M
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
F it, lol!

im buying the new awd m5

hopefully it'll look better than the current g30 m550i
Hahah thats funny but at the same time makes you think about it... The new m5 with awd is going to be a 4 door gtr!
Old 04-20-2017, 10:03 PM
  #116  
Super Member
 
Fairbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 773
Received 44 Likes on 34 Posts
C300
600 hp all new 2017 alpina B7, I'm not sure about S class but this thing is freaking crazy , and yes I have to alpina B7 in my shop lol

Old 04-20-2017, 10:28 PM
  #117  
Member
 
notatroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG or M
Originally Posted by Fairbird
600 hp all new 2017 alpina B7, I'm not sure about S class but this thing is freaking crazy , and yes I have to alpina B7 in my shop lol

The new facelift s63 that just came out looks really good imo
Old 04-20-2017, 10:45 PM
  #118  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaspam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 201 Likes on 154 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
Originally Posted by notatroll
Love it. Even though he is the only one to get there, that doesnt take away the fact that he did it! As far as I know he holds the record for 1/4 mile, 1/2 mile and 60-130 mph acceleration. Couple guys have tried with m157 but failed unfortunately. Thats mercedes for you.
actually supposedly there is a guy in tri-state area "mo" that has even faster M5 that i have heard about from a few guys up there... he just hasnt gotten it to any 1/2 mile events yet
Old 04-21-2017, 11:39 AM
  #119  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Amg63-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1,370
Received 40 Likes on 36 Posts
CLS63 AMG
Originally Posted by notatroll
Your race depends on how two cars are modded too though. How much does st1 m5 make, which tuner, which dyno on what day? How much does st1 e63 make, which tuner on which dyno and on what day? Even stock for stock m5 traps more in the 1/4 mile. Tune for tune both on stock turbos m5 will beat it as well.
stock for stock the m5 does not trap higher.

Unless your talking about m5 CP which traps 122mph, even then the e63s still beats or matches it as it also traps 122-123 (road and track got 122 for m5 and 123 for e63s)

and on st1 both on stock turbos it depends on each are tuned, m5 will not always beat it.
Old 04-21-2017, 12:01 PM
  #120  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Amg63-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1,370
Received 40 Likes on 36 Posts
CLS63 AMG
Originally Posted by gaspam
i agree and most of the M157's ive seen on here are cutting 1.8's so 4 sec 0-60mph according to your numbers which i tend to agree is the real 0-60 mph number for tuned M157's
so as you said before, you recorded a 3.3s 0-60, but that's only after the car started moving.

So the lag the car has when just mashing the gas is basically between .5-.7s giving it a real world time of 4.0 when not using any launch methods?

and this is tuned, so a stock one likely higher than 4.0s, maybe 4.2-3
Old 04-21-2017, 12:14 PM
  #121  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaspam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 201 Likes on 154 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
^ i tried all launch methods with all similar results... brake boosting felt the most responsive, when you get it right, but get it wrong and limp mode
Old 04-21-2017, 12:17 PM
  #122  
Member
 
notatroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG or M
Originally Posted by Amg63-
stock for stock the m5 does not trap higher.

Unless your talking about m5 CP which traps 122mph, even then the e63s still beats or matches it as it also traps 122-123 (road and track got 122 for m5 and 123 for e63s)

and on st1 both on stock turbos it depends on each are tuned, m5 will not always beat it.
Idk.. Over at the m5 forum few guys are trapping 121+ on their stock base m5s. I dont see a 1/4mile thread on this forum so I haven't seen any members showing their time slips.
Old 04-21-2017, 12:28 PM
  #123  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Amg63-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1,370
Received 40 Likes on 36 Posts
CLS63 AMG
Originally Posted by gaspam
^ i tried all launch methods with all similar results... brake boosting felt the most responsive, when you get it right, but get it wrong and limp mode
right, so I've been trying to find the lag time the MCT has for a while now but it's not possible to measure with any kind of tool.

So based Off the 60ft chart above it seems like it's adding an extra .7s of delay to the moving 0-60 time.

4.0s is not a slow 0-60 but at the same time should be much better with 4matic and the power tuned m157 is making.
Old 04-21-2017, 08:21 PM
  #124  
Super Member
 
Fairbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 773
Received 44 Likes on 34 Posts
C300
get over it guys
Old 04-21-2017, 09:04 PM
  #125  
Member
 
notatroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG or M
Originally Posted by Fairbird
get over it guys
Agree. Lets admit it. This gen e63 4matic was put together, not engineered. The next gen e63 4matic is actually engineered. The battle between the new m5 and e63 is going to be closer then ever! Atleast in stock form that is. When it comes to tuning, the m5 will probably be ahead again.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: W4 turbos



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 PM.