W212 AMG Discuss the W212 AMG's such as the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stock vs. Tuned Data (0-60, etc.)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-26-2019, 03:18 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
cij911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,879
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
one car at a time
Stock vs. Tuned Data (0-60, etc.)

Well I just bought a Dragy and tested on my 100% stock 2014 e63s. The only thing non stock is larger tires, which may be hurting the acceleration - 265 front and 296 rear. Dragy appears to be very easy to use and, from what I have read, it is extremely accurate.

I did a few runs today and not super happy with the results. Basically the car appears to be a ~4 second 0-60 without launch control / race start and ~3.8 seconds 0-60 with race start (I think I did it properly but it was my first time using race start). I will log quite a bit using HP Tuners MPV12 and Dragy, before I tune the car, so I will have plenty of before and after data for the forum. I will be curious to see what others are getting for times as well.

For comparison, my highly modified e55 ran a 4.2 - 4.3 today as well using the same technique (just floor it, no launch technique)....



Last edited by cij911; 07-26-2019 at 06:58 PM.
Old 07-26-2019, 04:15 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
cij911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,879
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
one car at a time
What are your thoughts on the DA? It is really humid today (and hot), but basically at sea level.....DA shows 1600-2100ft (no idea if that is good or bad)....
Old 07-26-2019, 06:56 PM
  #3  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,711
Received 2,037 Likes on 1,420 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Does dragy allow for 1 foot roll out like the car mag testers?

oh yeah there it is 3.57 seconds -- pretty close to what car mags got ... I think motortrend got 3.3-3.4 at best with this car bone stock with 1 ft roll out


if you give me 1/4 mile times we can correct for the DA:

https://www.dragtimes.com/da-density...calculator.php

Last edited by PeterUbers; 07-26-2019 at 07:01 PM.
Old 07-26-2019, 07:11 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
cij911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,879
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
one car at a time
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
Does dragy allow for 1 foot roll out like the car mag testers?

oh yeah there it is 3.57 seconds -- pretty close to what car mags got ... I think motortrend got 3.3-3.4 at best with this car bone stock with 1 ft roll out


if you give me 1/4 mile times we can correct for the DA:
What does the 1 ft roll really mean? (I know nothing about drag racing.)

I haven't done a 1/4 mile run, but will and will post the results as well. Pretty neat tool to add to the toolbox. I'm really interested in seeing what gains can be had with the tune.
Old 07-26-2019, 07:45 PM
  #5  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,711
Received 2,037 Likes on 1,420 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned


https://www.caranddriver.com/feature...ce-of-rollout/
Old 07-26-2019, 08:04 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
cij911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,879
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
one car at a time
Yes, I saw that, but I don't really know what it represents.....

Here is a 1/4 mile run....trap speed is weak IMHO....Most of the magazines (like the video above) show trap speed ~120mph .... 4 mph is huge.


Last edited by cij911; 07-26-2019 at 08:07 PM.
Old 07-26-2019, 08:10 PM
  #7  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,711
Received 2,037 Likes on 1,420 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
https://www.caranddriver.com/feature...ce-of-rollout/
Old 07-26-2019, 08:14 PM
  #8  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,711
Received 2,037 Likes on 1,420 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Here's the corrected:




Old 07-26-2019, 08:17 PM
  #9  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,711
Received 2,037 Likes on 1,420 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Your car is in the median for most 2014-2016 e63S's that are stock and with stock tires you would be a bit quicker but doubtful you would see another tenth in the 1/4

tank was less than 1/3?
tire pressure was 30 psi?
comfort suspension?
Old 07-26-2019, 08:51 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
cij911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,879
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
one car at a time
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
Your car is in the median for most 2014-2016 e63S's that are stock and with stock tires you would be a bit quicker but doubtful you would see another tenth in the 1/4

tank was less than 1/3?
tire pressure was 30 psi?
comfort suspension?
Thanks Peter!!

Tank was about 1/2 full, tires are 43 psi IIRC, suspension was in sport...
Old 07-26-2019, 11:09 PM
  #11  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,711
Received 2,037 Likes on 1,420 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Originally Posted by cij911
Thanks Peter!!

Tank was about 1/2 full, tires are 43 psi IIRC, suspension was in sport...
Ideal is as mentioned; 30 psi and comfort suspension ... brake torque to 2000-2500 in s+ in sport traction
Old 07-26-2019, 11:23 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Magno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
2013 E63 Estate
Curious why Sport Traction would be faster than Traction off. I get it in my 2wd but not with 4wd?
Old 07-26-2019, 11:43 PM
  #13  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,711
Received 2,037 Likes on 1,420 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Originally Posted by Magno
Curious why Sport Traction would be faster than Traction off. I get it in my 2wd but not with 4wd?
I meant traction off
Old 07-27-2019, 09:16 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
cij911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,879
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
one car at a time
Has anyone tested the UPD M157 Cold Air Induction Kit ? They claim 20+ whp. So I am wondering if anyone has done a real life 1/4 mile run or 0-60 times to verify the results.
Old 07-27-2019, 11:00 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Savage212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 450
Received 98 Likes on 70 Posts
2014 E63 AMG wagon
Originally Posted by Magno
Curious why Sport Traction would be faster than Traction off. I get it in my 2wd but not with 4wd?
My car seems a bit faster in "sport" traction. With it off, when I launch it almost always spins a short shifts into 2nd.

Last edited by Savage212; 07-27-2019 at 12:17 PM.
Old 07-27-2019, 02:12 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Iron Sheik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,038
Received 36 Likes on 25 Posts
E 320
Originally Posted by cij911
Has anyone tested the UPD M157 Cold Air Induction Kit ? They claim 20+ whp. So I am wondering if anyone has done a real life 1/4 mile run or 0-60 times to verify the results.
I have it on my 2016 CLS63!

Did the runs on two different nights though! Different conditions!

Stock was 11.6 @ 122! Unknown Gas quality as I don't know what the dealer put in the car when I picked it up! Assuming 91 (Canada) 1/2 tank
With UPD was 11.4 @ 124! 94 Petro Canada and had 1/2 tank

Tire pressure for both was full tire pressure from what I can recall with horrible 1.8 to 1.9 60'!!
Similar settings with traction on, comfort suspension and S+ for transmission!

Ps. These are times for a stock car!

Iron Sheik
The following users liked this post:
cij911 (07-29-2019)
Old 07-29-2019, 08:22 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
cij911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,879
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
one car at a time
Originally Posted by Iron Sheik
I have it on my 2016 CLS63!

Did the runs on two different nights though! Different conditions!

Stock was 11.6 @ 122! Unknown Gas quality as I don't know what the dealer put in the car when I picked it up! Assuming 91 (Canada) 1/2 tank
With UPD was 11.4 @ 124! 94 Petro Canada and had 1/2 tank

Tire pressure for both was full tire pressure from what I can recall with horrible 1.8 to 1.9 60'!!
Similar settings with traction on, comfort suspension and S+ for transmission!

Ps. These are times for a stock car!

Iron Sheik
Wow, 11.4 @ 124 on a stock car / stock tune ? Do you have a time sheet or dragy (as those seem higher than anything I have seen). Congratulations on a very fast car.
Old 07-30-2019, 12:33 AM
  #18  
Super Member
 
billvp218's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 657
Received 140 Likes on 101 Posts
m157 SL63
Originally Posted by cij911
Wow, 11.4 @ 124 on a stock car / stock tune ? Do you have a time sheet or dragy (as those seem higher than anything I have seen). Congratulations on a very fast car.
the listed "UPD" is an intake setup, so that run wasn't stock but showing the improvement from the UPD intake
Old 07-30-2019, 08:37 AM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
cij911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,879
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
one car at a time
Originally Posted by billvp218
the listed "UPD" is an intake setup, so that run wasn't stock but showing the improvement from the UPD intake
Sorry I meant to confirm that everything else was stock....I know the magazines all quoted 11.6 @ 122, but I haven't seen a single stock car do that and assumed the magazines were given faster cars (like OEMs have been doing for years)....Obviously something is wrong with my car if I am only showing 117 mph in the quarter mile.
Old 07-30-2019, 08:50 AM
  #20  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,711
Received 2,037 Likes on 1,420 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Originally Posted by cij911
Sorry I meant to confirm that everything else was stock....I know the magazines all quoted 11.6 @ 122, but I haven't seen a single stock car do that and assumed the magazines were given faster cars (like OEMs have been doing for years)....Obviously something is wrong with my car if I am only showing 117 mph in the quarter mile.
Car mags do correct for ideal conditions ...
Old 07-30-2019, 08:58 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
cij911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,879
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
one car at a time
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
Car mags do correct for ideal conditions ...
Interesting additional data from Renntech :

Performance Tests:VehicleUpgrades0-60mph0-100mph60-130mph1/4 Mile ETTrap Speed

W212 - E63 AMG S 4MATIC Sedan

Stock w/Launch Control : 3.68 sec8.47 sec10.60 sec12.00 sec119 mph

W212 - E63 AMG S 4MATIC Sedan ECU+ Upgrade w/Launch Control3.41 sec7.95 sec9.98 sec11.87 sec120 mph

W212 - E63 AMG S 4MATIC Sedan R2 Pkg w/Launch Control3.37 sec7.83 sec9.90 sec11.61 sec122 mph

W212 - E63 AMG S 4MATIC Sedan R2 Pkg + TCU Upgrade w/Launch Control3.09 sec7.40 sec9.40 sec11.31 sec124 mph

*If not otherwise noted, performed on non-prepped asphalt and with OEM, Street-Legal and/or Non-Performance tires. Data measured with Racelogic Performance Box.

So trapping 122 - 124mph is definitely not in stock territory.....Love to see time slip and / or dragy to confirm. Again, everything I have seen is sub 120 mph (and 4 mph in the 1/4 mile is a huge difference.)
Old 07-30-2019, 12:26 PM
  #22  
Super Member
 
billvp218's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 657
Received 140 Likes on 101 Posts
m157 SL63
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
Car mags do correct for ideal conditions ...
And people showing their own times almost never do, unless it's to improve them.
Old 07-30-2019, 12:36 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jvakos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,182
Received 171 Likes on 119 Posts
E63 SL55 996TT C5Z06
Originally Posted by Iron Sheik
I have it on my 2016 CLS63!

Did the runs on two different nights though! Different conditions!

Stock was 11.6 @ 122! Unknown Gas quality as I don't know what the dealer put in the car when I picked it up! Assuming 91 (Canada) 1/2 tank
With UPD was 11.4 @ 124! 94 Petro Canada and had 1/2 tank

Tire pressure for both was full tire pressure from what I can recall with horrible 1.8 to 1.9 60'!!
Similar settings with traction on, comfort suspension and S+ for transmission!

Ps. These are times for a stock car!

Iron Sheik
Sheik - hey what tire pressure did you run when you say "full" tire pressure? For normal driving I have mine at 42psi all around and like the feel, but rears seem to slip a lot during a race start (i have new MPSS A/S3 tires all around). I've never tracked my car but at times when I play around with 0-60 runs and race start I will drop the rear pressure to 34psi and they hook up better with lower pressure.
Old 08-01-2019, 12:54 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Iron Sheik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,038
Received 36 Likes on 25 Posts
E 320


Here are the slips!

Car has everything stock minus the UPD intake! Again, for comparison sake, the 122 mph vs 124 mph traps were NOT done on the same night!
Gas quality in 122 mph is unknown vs 94 octane in the 124 mph trap!

Tire pressure was 50 all around? May have dropped to 30 or 35 in some runs, but did not notice a difference as my 60' was still garbage!

Iron Sheik
Old 08-01-2019, 12:58 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Iron Sheik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,038
Received 36 Likes on 25 Posts
E 320

For comparison, I am attaching a Stage 1 E63 (Eurocharged Canada) de-cat that my brother has to show the difference in mph!
He is running stock everything and run-flats in the fronts lol!

He is 865 and I am 13!

Iron Sheik


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Stock vs. Tuned Data (0-60, etc.)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 PM.