Drove the F90 M5 for a extended period- My thoughts inside/pics




Here some cliff notes:
<snipped [A LOT] for the sake of TL;DR>





Could have been the modes you were in?? Hardware is hardware- Its in the software as a tune clearly made my E63S a more responsive unit.




From a design perspective I feel the AMG and especially the Edition 1 is more cohesive and stands apart from a standard E-Class. Very extrovert and I like it that way
The BMW is a sleeper as you mentioned but the M5's attributes make me look forward to the M8. They just can't get the rear-ends right these days.For anyone who hasn't pulled the trigger in the US, MY18 M5's will be a true bargain...
Last edited by Wolfman; Aug 14, 2018 at 11:59 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




From a design perspective I feel the AMG and especially the Edition 1 is more cohesive and stands apart from a standard E-Class. Very extrovert and I like it that way
The BMW is a sleeper as you mentioned but the M5's attributes make me look forward to the M8. They just can't get the rear-ends right these days.For anyone who hasn't pulled the trigger in the US, MY18 M5's will be a true bargain...
I have to say the M5 even in sport plus damper mode was much much more compliant than our cars in Comfort mode. Night and day... something that didnt bother me though either way with the E or M, yet again just two different ways to drive a nice handling car.




Btw, had the new Alpina B7 through Turo this weekend in LA and was floored by how good that entire package was.
Last edited by absent; Aug 14, 2018 at 08:23 PM.
And some magazine had the M5 go into limp mode from trying to launch, had to drive it around until it went away while the other host stood beside the E63, waiting.
Writing off the current E63's transmission because of history would be a mistake.
Both are awesome cars with almost identical performance. It mainly comes down to which you like being in better.
But mark my words, when they facelift the new M5, they will get rid of the physical rings in the instrument cluster and go full digital.
Last edited by Carac; Aug 15, 2018 at 09:19 AM.




The car(s) I drove had the rings but they are displayed digitally. There are no more hard pieces and a needle for that matter.
If I am actually using launch control then I think the MCT is going to have the advantage based on what Carac stated but for impromptu line up with no LC- it would be a toss up under brake boost. I used to brake boost my tuned RS7's and Bentley with nice results via the ZF.
Last edited by Vic55; Aug 15, 2018 at 10:50 AM.
If I am actually using launch control then I think the MCT is going to have the advantage based on what Carac stated but for impromptu line up with no LC- it would be a toss up under brake boost. I used to brake boost my tuned RS7's and Bentley with nice results via the ZF.
Last edited by Carac; Aug 15, 2018 at 10:54 AM.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNGkIa4QXSY
Oh hahaah I see what you meant now. I didnt really notice it much as I was focused on the HUD which is slightly better IMO than the E's.
And I agree about the HUD, I just wish they would stop aligning the LCD used in the HUD diagonally so it worked with polarized glasses. When they first started putting LCD's all over the place in cars, companies like Ray-ban started to shift the polarization 45 degrees so that you could see the screens. Then the car companies rotated the alignment of pixels to "fix" a problem glasses companies already had (a new pair of glasses is cheaper than a new car) so now the new glasses that were changed to work with LCDs are once again aligned with the HUD so it's half brightness looking straight at the windshield, invisible if you turn your head 45 degrees one way, and full brightness if you turn it 45 the other. That's an aside, but I just had to rant.




And I agree about the HUD, I just wish they would stop aligning the LCD used in the HUD diagonally so it worked with polarized glasses. When they first started putting LCD's all over the place in cars, companies like Ray-ban started to shift the polarization 45 degrees so that you could see the screens. Then the car companies rotated the alignment of pixels to "fix" a problem glasses companies already had (a new pair of glasses is cheaper than a new car) so now the new glasses that were changed to work with LCDs are once again aligned with the HUD so it's half brightness looking straight at the windshield, invisible if you turn your head 45 degrees one way, and full brightness if you turn it 45 the other. That's an aside, but I just had to rant.
https://youtu.be/_itnGRWnQi0
And some magazine had the M5 go into limp mode from trying to launch, had to drive it around until it went away while the other host stood beside the E63, waiting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfZtr6Sc6q0
Writing off the current E63's transmission because of history would be a mistake.




I see the zero to 60 numbers as being better in almost every scenario but I know that doesnt mean the actual launch is better which I believe you are alluding to. (60 ft).
The M5 and AMG are so close objectively now that it really just comes down to subjective feelings about the two.




I like the MCT for its racey feel but it can be annoying with the downshifts and thuds- while the ZF is buttery smooth but one cant always feel the car responding to the gear changes. Again, two ways to win!!!
Im almost sure that without LC or brake boost, just using the mash-and-go method the M5 with the torque converter will launch harder than the E63s MCT.



