Member
Quote:
US Fed regulations mandate factory rated top vehicle speed cannot exceed the manufacturer's US tire speed rating selected for that vehicle - a Fed "safety" thing mandated on auto manufacturers - and frankly not a MB/AMG conspiracy thing - gee's guys..
130-149-168-186 - are familiar sounding #'s to this enthusiast audience - yes ?
So your "issue" pivots to the manufacturer's tire selection for the US model - H-Rated 130mph are available All-Season tires - V/149mph are avail All-Season or High-Performance/"Summer " depending on tire manuf and tire size - W/168mph and Y/186mph are "high performance/"summer" tires.
Now... in general terms under US Federal warranty protection - "flashing a tune" to a ECU technically void the manufacturers warranty on that ECU - and exceeding the manufacturers vehicle speed limit technically put the liability on whatever mechanically happens over the manufacturers original speed limit directly on your shoulders - but heck, that's sure understandable isn't it ?
Bingo. The tires on the vehicle determine top speed limitation. Another piece from Germany,Originally Posted by fabbrisd1
Frankly - interesting "opinions" - but as answered by a previous factual post - which was not acknowledged by the more emotionally opinionated expressing themselves here.US Fed regulations mandate factory rated top vehicle speed cannot exceed the manufacturer's US tire speed rating selected for that vehicle - a Fed "safety" thing mandated on auto manufacturers - and frankly not a MB/AMG conspiracy thing - gee's guys..
130-149-168-186 - are familiar sounding #'s to this enthusiast audience - yes ?
So your "issue" pivots to the manufacturer's tire selection for the US model - H-Rated 130mph are available All-Season tires - V/149mph are avail All-Season or High-Performance/"Summer " depending on tire manuf and tire size - W/168mph and Y/186mph are "high performance/"summer" tires.
Now... in general terms under US Federal warranty protection - "flashing a tune" to a ECU technically void the manufacturers warranty on that ECU - and exceeding the manufacturers vehicle speed limit technically put the liability on whatever mechanically happens over the manufacturers original speed limit directly on your shoulders - but heck, that's sure understandable isn't it ?
all of the cars I have rented have an option under vehicle settings to limit top speed to "Winter Tire Speed" or something to that effect. Essentially, it limits the car to 210 km/hr or 240 km/ hr depending on the speed rating of the Winter Tire.
-C
348SStb
Senior Member
close
If a tire is rated for speed X then obviously a manufacturer has to require that speed x cannot be exceeded.
But are we at chicken and egg here?
Surely we can simply ask the question why has Mercedes chosen to create a situation (tires or otherwise) such that the top speed of the car is only 130mph when clearly they know how to allow/produce cars to go faster?
Possible answers:
1) The cherished “fake AMG” theory is actually true
2) Cheaper tires keep the price down. The price of this particular car needs to be as low as possible to compete. (But then again, why not take care of that since better tires are available for purchase; or why not offer an option package with a higher top speed)
3) Mercedes has some handshake agreement out there with some authority or other manufacturer having to do with the top speed of this car (similar to the agreement Japanese auto manufacturers had out there in the 1990s not to exceed 300 horsepower)- but why make the agreement in the first place?
[Others?]
But are we at chicken and egg here?
Surely we can simply ask the question why has Mercedes chosen to create a situation (tires or otherwise) such that the top speed of the car is only 130mph when clearly they know how to allow/produce cars to go faster?
Possible answers:
1) The cherished “fake AMG” theory is actually true
2) Cheaper tires keep the price down. The price of this particular car needs to be as low as possible to compete. (But then again, why not take care of that since better tires are available for purchase; or why not offer an option package with a higher top speed)
3) Mercedes has some handshake agreement out there with some authority or other manufacturer having to do with the top speed of this car (similar to the agreement Japanese auto manufacturers had out there in the 1990s not to exceed 300 horsepower)- but why make the agreement in the first place?
[Others?]
Quote:
As someone with two AMGs (C63 507 edition and a GT-C) and having spent much time on various Autobahns, here is some food for thought:
I have driven the C63s, E63S, GTS and Audi S6 on various Autobahns. The S6 and 43 models are neck and neck under full throttle acceleration. I witnessed this first hand on the A63 down to Kaiserslautern.
The E63S is an absolute monster that not much can keep up with at wide open throttle. I pulled on a few Supercars while there and was quite shocked: GT3, 458 Speciale, Audi RS6 Performance. They could not keep up when we went from a 130 Km/hr zone to an unrestricted zone.
So, as someone pointed out here:
The 43/53 models are designed to compete with the Audi S line and BMW 330i/550i lines. MB has stated that numerous times and any sales person will tell you where MB is marketing those models.
The 63 models are designed to compete with the Audi RS line and BMW M lines.
Now, what constitutes an AMG? As someone said here, go take the AMG tour in Affalterbach and you will see. �� It was EXTREMELY enlightening! As my tour guide asked me, "Would you ever consider an All Electric car an AMG?" It's an interesting question as what defines an AMG? History, Sound, Power, Vehicle Dynamics, Exclusivity, an AMG Badge, having your vehicle built in Germany (Sindelfingen, Bremen) or America (Tuscaloosa), or is it something else or a combination of many things...? We had a 10 minute conversation about that one. Needless to say, AMG are ready for when the world decides we need all Electric vehicles!
As to the OP original question about the 130 MPH limiter (210 Km/hr), that is a good question considering the S6 is limited to 155 MPH (248 Km/hr) and the BMW 550i is limited to 130 MPH or 155 MPH with a package. So it seems that it is more of a marketing criteria to match the 550i vs. mechanical limitation. Enjoy all of your vehicles OP. Hopefully, you are in a warm climate and can drive your vehicles year-round. Us folk up North are waiting for Spring! ��
Happy driving all.
-C
Stumbling around the "New Posts" and I find this little gem. I cringed through this entire thread until I got to this posting. Thank you for providing some level headedness in this discussion that has gone out of control. I am stuck down in Stuttgart and dream of getting up to K-town and the empty bahns. I agree with you full in regards to touring Affalterbach and would add to take a tour at the Sindelfingen factory where, like most of the other MB factories, both MB and AMGs are assembled. I was surprised to find out that all Mercedes are assembled "by class" on the same lines. We saw both S450s and S63s being built on the same exact finishing line. The AMG pieces are sent down to the factories and assembled by the same people working on regular MBs. I posed the question to our guide, and he gave me a very peculiar look. He said 43s and 53s have to be AMGs because it says so. Pretty simple answer. To the OP, don't get drug into such a horribly rediculous argument. You obviously appreciate AMG given you have various lines in your stable.Originally Posted by chris135b
Wow...this was an interesting read!As someone with two AMGs (C63 507 edition and a GT-C) and having spent much time on various Autobahns, here is some food for thought:
I have driven the C63s, E63S, GTS and Audi S6 on various Autobahns. The S6 and 43 models are neck and neck under full throttle acceleration. I witnessed this first hand on the A63 down to Kaiserslautern.
The E63S is an absolute monster that not much can keep up with at wide open throttle. I pulled on a few Supercars while there and was quite shocked: GT3, 458 Speciale, Audi RS6 Performance. They could not keep up when we went from a 130 Km/hr zone to an unrestricted zone.
So, as someone pointed out here:
The 43/53 models are designed to compete with the Audi S line and BMW 330i/550i lines. MB has stated that numerous times and any sales person will tell you where MB is marketing those models.
The 63 models are designed to compete with the Audi RS line and BMW M lines.
Now, what constitutes an AMG? As someone said here, go take the AMG tour in Affalterbach and you will see. �� It was EXTREMELY enlightening! As my tour guide asked me, "Would you ever consider an All Electric car an AMG?" It's an interesting question as what defines an AMG? History, Sound, Power, Vehicle Dynamics, Exclusivity, an AMG Badge, having your vehicle built in Germany (Sindelfingen, Bremen) or America (Tuscaloosa), or is it something else or a combination of many things...? We had a 10 minute conversation about that one. Needless to say, AMG are ready for when the world decides we need all Electric vehicles!
As to the OP original question about the 130 MPH limiter (210 Km/hr), that is a good question considering the S6 is limited to 155 MPH (248 Km/hr) and the BMW 550i is limited to 130 MPH or 155 MPH with a package. So it seems that it is more of a marketing criteria to match the 550i vs. mechanical limitation. Enjoy all of your vehicles OP. Hopefully, you are in a warm climate and can drive your vehicles year-round. Us folk up North are waiting for Spring! ��
Happy driving all.
-C
AMG was not "one man, one engine" before it became "one man, one engine". That was the greatest marketing scheme in automotive history, IMHO. AMG was never supposed to be about that. Good reads are everywhere about the history of AMG. I would guess that the ONE is not a true AMG with that mentality. Neither the Cigarette boats with AMG plastered on their hulls. It is sad to see folks squable about such asinine things, and shows the real arrogance (and ignorance) of some of the owners. This looks more like a thread that belongs on a BMW forum.
I would agree that it has to do with the speed ratings on the tires, to answer your original question. Nothing more, nothing less.
Senior Member
Well, this thread has really put life into perspective!
There was me worrying about Brexit, climate change and whether Donald Trump’s hair is real or not!
When actually the real issue is whether a 53 AMG is a true AMG or not!
There was me worrying about Brexit, climate change and whether Donald Trump’s hair is real or not!
When actually the real issue is whether a 53 AMG is a true AMG or not!

Super Member
Well this thread turned quite ugly.
I don't own any AMG but my basic opinion is that if Mercedes says that a model is an AMG then it is an AMG.
Also, the 53 and 43 models are not limited to 130mph in Europe.
Even my old BMW 2-litre diesel used to have a top speed limited to 155mph and was surely capable of going even faster, otherwise no need for the limiter. I never drove anywhere near that fast, but it seems ridiculous that a car of the caliber of an E53 should be restricted to an even lower top speed. Obviously there are reasons why it has been limited in the US, and that low rated tires have been fitted, but I don't know what they are and I'm sure that it is some BS that is designed to create more differentiation between models on paper.
I don't own any AMG but my basic opinion is that if Mercedes says that a model is an AMG then it is an AMG.
Also, the 53 and 43 models are not limited to 130mph in Europe.
Even my old BMW 2-litre diesel used to have a top speed limited to 155mph and was surely capable of going even faster, otherwise no need for the limiter. I never drove anywhere near that fast, but it seems ridiculous that a car of the caliber of an E53 should be restricted to an even lower top speed. Obviously there are reasons why it has been limited in the US, and that low rated tires have been fitted, but I don't know what they are and I'm sure that it is some BS that is designed to create more differentiation between models on paper.
Member
Quote:
Good questions and points. Originally Posted by 348SStb
If a tire is rated for speed X then obviously a manufacturer has to require that speed x cannot be exceeded.
But are we at chicken and egg here?
Surely we can simply ask the question why has Mercedes chosen to create a situation (tires or otherwise) such that the top speed of the car is only 130mph when clearly they know how to allow/produce cars to go faster?
Possible answers:
1) The cherished “fake AMG” theory is actually true
2) Cheaper tires keep the price down. The price of this particular car needs to be as low as possible to compete. (But then again, why not take care of that since better tires are available for purchase; or why not offer an option package with a higher top speed)
3) Mercedes has some handshake agreement out there with some authority or other manufacturer having to do with the top speed of this car (similar to the agreement Japanese auto manufacturers had out there in the 1990s not to exceed 300 horsepower)- but why make the agreement in the first place?
[Others?]
But are we at chicken and egg here?
Surely we can simply ask the question why has Mercedes chosen to create a situation (tires or otherwise) such that the top speed of the car is only 130mph when clearly they know how to allow/produce cars to go faster?
Possible answers:
1) The cherished “fake AMG” theory is actually true
2) Cheaper tires keep the price down. The price of this particular car needs to be as low as possible to compete. (But then again, why not take care of that since better tires are available for purchase; or why not offer an option package with a higher top speed)
3) Mercedes has some handshake agreement out there with some authority or other manufacturer having to do with the top speed of this car (similar to the agreement Japanese auto manufacturers had out there in the 1990s not to exceed 300 horsepower)- but why make the agreement in the first place?
[Others?]
Too me, if MB were truly competing with the BMW 550i and Audi S6, then doing what BMW did would make sense: offer a "performance package" with a higher top speed (mostly just higher speed rated tires.) Or, as you are saying, just have the car limited to 150 MPH out of the box with V or W rated tires....Something tells me this decision is a marketing thing.
In this regard, the GT, GTS and GTC all come with Michelin Pilot Super Sport tires. The GTR and E63S come with the new Michelin Pilot Port 4S tires. When I asked my Inventory specialist to have MB put on the 4S on my GTC, the response we got back from MB was MB cannot guarantee tire brand or type upon delivery... 😕 Again, I think this comes down to marketing vehicles.
Happy motoring/driving-it-like-you-stoke-it/cruising around town all! 🙂
-C
Quote:
I have a real AMG E63S, how do I get the free track day?Originally Posted by susman@eurogermantown.com
as long as I get the free AMG track day (AMG Driving Academy, $1900 value), its an AMG
348SStb
Senior Member
close
Quote:
Go to the AMG Private Lounge web site and register to become a member. It may take a day or two for Daimler to complete your registration.Originally Posted by V70cat
I have a real AMG E63S, how do I get the free track day?
Once a member at AMG Private Lounge, log in and find the area mentioning “AMG Driving Academy” and sign up.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
ExploreSuper Member
24Hours
Super Member
close
- Join DateMar 2005
- LocationNYC area
- Posts:551
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2019 E63S wagon; 2016 Landrover Landmark
-
Likes:883
-
Liked:160 Times in 105 Posts
Quote:
Entertaining thread... I hope OP will enjoy the new car safely and in good health. Originally Posted by V70cat
I have a real AMG E63S, how do I get the free track day?
V70cat... it is amazing that so many dealers neglect to inform buyers of AMG cars that each new purchase entitles you to an AMG track day. That's half the reason I'm reloading!

One thing the feds did not think of with their speed limit versus tire speed limit.... (
nothing prevents an owner from buying cheap low speed tires and having them installed ....
So bring on those cheap CHINESE "F" rated tires @ $25 each!
Sometimes the nanny state sux!
LOL
nothing prevents an owner from buying cheap low speed tires and having them installed ....
So bring on those cheap CHINESE "F" rated tires @ $25 each!
Sometimes the nanny state sux!
LOL
Junior Member
This is an amazing thread, outside of the language in some posts.
I have the E53 "AMG"
. I love it. Absolutely!. Debated between the E63 and this, did not buy the E63 not because of the real vs fake emotion, but because for 45k less (when I put my options on), I thought this better fit my needs. For track, I have a champ car and a Mini Cooper, so this will see track maybe once or twice a year. For people who see the car they wow at the AMG. When I see an E63, I bow to the master as I understand the difference.I even compared to an RS5 sportback as I was a Audi guy for 15 years, but in the end chose the AMG E53.
But to the original question, the engine and tires in the 53 series are extremely capable of going beyond 130mph. When the Eagles Canyon track opens up, there will be some straightaways where I may be able to push that. But the car wont!!!! Argh!!!!!!!
Is there a hack... In the Audis, I could do a lot myself with the VAGCOMs. Not sure if we can do this in Mercs vs debating and complaining.
Btw, love my E53, proud of it.
I have the E53 "AMG"
. I love it. Absolutely!. Debated between the E63 and this, did not buy the E63 not because of the real vs fake emotion, but because for 45k less (when I put my options on), I thought this better fit my needs. For track, I have a champ car and a Mini Cooper, so this will see track maybe once or twice a year. For people who see the car they wow at the AMG. When I see an E63, I bow to the master as I understand the difference.I even compared to an RS5 sportback as I was a Audi guy for 15 years, but in the end chose the AMG E53.But to the original question, the engine and tires in the 53 series are extremely capable of going beyond 130mph. When the Eagles Canyon track opens up, there will be some straightaways where I may be able to push that. But the car wont!!!! Argh!!!!!!!
Is there a hack... In the Audis, I could do a lot myself with the VAGCOMs. Not sure if we can do this in Mercs vs debating and complaining.
Btw, love my E53, proud of it.
348SStb
Senior Member
close
Quote:
I have the E53 "AMG"
. I love it. Absolutely!. Debated between the E63 and this, did not buy the E63 not because of the real vs fake emotion, but because for 45k less (when I put my options on), I thought this better fit my needs. For track, I have a champ car and a Mini Cooper, so this will see track maybe once or twice a year. For people who see the car they wow at the AMG. When I see an E63, I bow to the master as I understand the difference.I even compared to an RS5 sportback as I was a Audi guy for 15 years, but in the end chose the AMG E53.
But to the original question, the engine and tires in the 53 series are extremely capable of going beyond 130mph. When the Eagles Canyon track opens up, there will be some straightaways where I may be able to push that. But the car wont!!!! Argh!!!!!!!
Is there a hack... In the Audis, I could do a lot myself with the VAGCOMs. Not sure if we can do this in Mercs vs debating and complaining.
Btw, love my E53, proud of it.
Great post!!!!Originally Posted by chasesunny
This is an amazing thread, outside of the language in some posts.I have the E53 "AMG"
. I love it. Absolutely!. Debated between the E63 and this, did not buy the E63 not because of the real vs fake emotion, but because for 45k less (when I put my options on), I thought this better fit my needs. For track, I have a champ car and a Mini Cooper, so this will see track maybe once or twice a year. For people who see the car they wow at the AMG. When I see an E63, I bow to the master as I understand the difference.I even compared to an RS5 sportback as I was a Audi guy for 15 years, but in the end chose the AMG E53.But to the original question, the engine and tires in the 53 series are extremely capable of going beyond 130mph. When the Eagles Canyon track opens up, there will be some straightaways where I may be able to push that. But the car wont!!!! Argh!!!!!!!
Is there a hack... In the Audis, I could do a lot myself with the VAGCOMs. Not sure if we can do this in Mercs vs debating and complaining.
Btw, love my E53, proud of it.
Super Member
Chrisk03
Super Member
close
- Join DateFeb 2017
- LocationNortheast, USA
- Posts:703
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I driveGLC43, GTI, X3, Mazda3
-
Likes:362
-
Liked:136 Times in 109 Posts
Quote:
Well, Fab settled your initial question in post #75, but for this one, I'm going with #2. I guess it could be a supplier issue, as well...MB seems to have a ton of those issues, which would ultimately lead back to pricing. They could cut a deal with Conti, Pirelli, whomever and supply a H-rated tire for the "fake" 53 that will suffice in 99% of the cases (H rating is prob fine for most) and at a lower cost. Double win.Originally Posted by 348SStb
If a tire is rated for speed X then obviously a manufacturer has to require that speed x cannot be exceeded.
But are we at chicken and egg here?
Surely we can simply ask the question why has Mercedes chosen to create a situation (tires or otherwise) such that the top speed of the car is only 130mph when clearly they know how to allow/produce cars to go faster?
Possible answers:
1) The cherished “fake AMG” theory is actually true
2) Cheaper tires keep the price down. The price of this particular car needs to be as low as possible to compete. (But then again, why not take care of that since better tires are available for purchase; or why not offer an option package with a higher top speed)
3) Mercedes has some handshake agreement out there with some authority or other manufacturer having to do with the top speed of this car (similar to the agreement Japanese auto manufacturers had out there in the 1990s not to exceed 300 horsepower)- but why make the agreement in the first place?
[Others?]
But are we at chicken and egg here?
Surely we can simply ask the question why has Mercedes chosen to create a situation (tires or otherwise) such that the top speed of the car is only 130mph when clearly they know how to allow/produce cars to go faster?
Possible answers:
1) The cherished “fake AMG” theory is actually true
2) Cheaper tires keep the price down. The price of this particular car needs to be as low as possible to compete. (But then again, why not take care of that since better tires are available for purchase; or why not offer an option package with a higher top speed)
3) Mercedes has some handshake agreement out there with some authority or other manufacturer having to do with the top speed of this car (similar to the agreement Japanese auto manufacturers had out there in the 1990s not to exceed 300 horsepower)- but why make the agreement in the first place?
[Others?]
Just my 2 cents, but what the hell do I know, I bought a lowly 43 model. I just wanted to come swing my pee-pee around in her like everyone else, which apparently is more fun if you have a 63.
Out Of Control!!
PeterUbers
Out Of Control!!
close
- Join DateJun 2004
- Posts:13,799
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
-
Likes:1,775
-
Liked:3,229 Times in 2,241 Posts
Wait, so why do we care if the E53 can't go faster than 130mph?
C280 Sport
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateJan 2009
- LocationNY & FL
- Posts:3,830
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I driveMB’s of all kinds.
-
Likes:351
-
Liked:595 Times in 474 Posts
Quote:
What I think everyone is trying to say is that 53 and 43 is just a marketing gimmick for MB and not a real AMG performance car.
Just a watered down E63.
If it was a real AMG it wouldn't be limited to 130!
Anyway, I suggest a tune and it will be your solutions.
100% True. Basically it is not a real AMG. It is not made in the AMG Factory. The "C43" Is no different then the C400/C450. Basically a upgraded C Class with AMG Badges. The same applies for the E53. Very sad Originally Posted by Das Geld 2
Now you know how Trump feels when he deals with democrats.What I think everyone is trying to say is that 53 and 43 is just a marketing gimmick for MB and not a real AMG performance car.
Just a watered down E63.
If it was a real AMG it wouldn't be limited to 130!
Anyway, I suggest a tune and it will be your solutions.
C280 Sport
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateJan 2009
- LocationNY & FL
- Posts:3,830
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I driveMB’s of all kinds.
-
Likes:351
-
Liked:595 Times in 474 Posts
Quote:
Dude you are off the wall/rails! You have no idea what knowledge I have but clearly it would appear I have more of an inside track here.
What do you think the difference is in the words “AMG Enhanced” versus “Handcrafted”?
Ahhh reading comprehension Originally Posted by MTrauman
Dude you are off the wall/rails! You have no idea what knowledge I have but clearly it would appear I have more of an inside track here.
What do you think the difference is in the words “AMG Enhanced” versus “Handcrafted”?
My wife teaches English and I bet if she explained this to her kids grades 6-12 they would understand. Key words here... Amazing what marketing can do to some people no?
E634Me
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateMay 2017
- LocationSouthern California
- Posts:1,726
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2018 E63S AMG
-
Likes:193
-
Liked:605 Times in 417 Posts
Still haven't reached a conclusion on whether the E53 is a real AMG or not.
But I've gleaned from the thread that the OP, who is not a dude, doesn't need a E63 to make her dick bigger, and feels she is a woman even though she does not have huge ****.
I would tend to agree with her, huge ***** don't make someone a woman.
That said, if a woman wanted to go for some bolt-ons, a tune, new shoes. I'd think a speed limiter increase is certainly in order . . .
But I've gleaned from the thread that the OP, who is not a dude, doesn't need a E63 to make her dick bigger, and feels she is a woman even though she does not have huge ****.
I would tend to agree with her, huge ***** don't make someone a woman.
That said, if a woman wanted to go for some bolt-ons, a tune, new shoes. I'd think a speed limiter increase is certainly in order . . .
Quote:
No AMG is built in Affalterbach..So, that argument is invalid...I can't believe this nonsense. So much misinformation. I am so glad I was given the opportunity to live in the home of MB and AMG....This discussion is childish and embarrassing...Way to go "enthusiasts."Originally Posted by C280 Sport
100% True. Basically it is not a real AMG. It is not made in the AMG Factory. The "C43" Is no different then the C400/C450. Basically a upgraded C Class with AMG Badges. The same applies for the E53. Very sad
Michael Khan
Super Member
close
- Join DateFeb 2013
- Posts:619
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
-
Likes:246
-
Liked:75 Times in 59 Posts
Senior Member
Quote:
But I've gleaned from the thread that the OP, who is not a dude, doesn't need a E63 to make her dick bigger, and feels she is a woman even though she does not have huge ****.
I would tend to agree with her, huge ***** don't make someone a woman.
That said, if a woman wanted to go for some bolt-ons, a tune, new shoes. I'd think a speed limiter increase is certainly in order . . .
Great post, thanks, cheered up the thread considerably! Originally Posted by E634Me
Still haven't reached a conclusion on whether the E53 is a real AMG or not.But I've gleaned from the thread that the OP, who is not a dude, doesn't need a E63 to make her dick bigger, and feels she is a woman even though she does not have huge ****.
I would tend to agree with her, huge ***** don't make someone a woman.
That said, if a woman wanted to go for some bolt-ons, a tune, new shoes. I'd think a speed limiter increase is certainly in order . . .
Quote:
Great post, thanks, cheered up the thread considerably!
Holy shut, this must be the most non **** getting group on this forum...Originally Posted by Slugsy
Great post, thanks, cheered up the thread considerably!
Senior Member
Quote:
And informative, I’m learning new words and grammar all the time!Originally Posted by MarcusDubya77
Holy shut, this must be the most non **** getting group on this forum...
Quote:
BECAUSE the OP wants to but here is the quote from OP in post #1 “I want to go faster than 130 mph. When I do it and how I do it is my business.”Originally Posted by PeterUbers
Wait, so why do we care if the E53 can't go faster than 130mph?
This tells you a bit about the OP and how ridiculous this whole thread is.
Super Member
Quote:
BECAUSE the OP wants to but here is the quote from OP in post #1 “I want to go faster than 130 mph. When I do it and how I do it is my business.”
This tells you a bit about the OP and how ridiculous this whole thread is.
true. why he is complaining?! Originally Posted by MTrauman
BECAUSE the OP wants to but here is the quote from OP in post #1 “I want to go faster than 130 mph. When I do it and how I do it is my business.”
This tells you a bit about the OP and how ridiculous this whole thread is.
go and take off the limiter without voiding your warranty. buy Y rated tires and that’s it. Simple story, but instead it’s better to complain and discuss it ( maybe he doesn’t know that nothing going to change
)benzbell
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateOct 2015
- Posts:1,511
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2023 Urus Performante 2018 Huracan Perf. - 2017 Ferrari 488 GTB
-
Likes:133
-
Liked:907 Times in 470 Posts
Quote:
I own a 2017 AMG SL63 and a 2019 AMG C63S. I stated previously I own two 63 models.
Your sig only says you have an SL 450. I'm going to rely on an old Ronald Reagan quote: "Trust but verify." If you have a 2017 SL63 and 2019 C63 S. Go to your car(s) and start them - (sitting inside), holding a spoon by the speedo/tach and take a pic. No personal info is divulged and proves you own these cars. Dash and hood overlook while your holding a spoon can't be faked or photoshopped - at least very easily. This would help your credibility (since you stated you own these cars) and would assure we're not getting punk'd. Like this.Originally Posted by 348SStb
I own a 2017 AMG SL63 and a 2019 AMG C63S. I stated previously I own two 63 models.








