W213 AMG Discuss the W213 AMG - 2017 to present
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

F90 M5 leases are going for $1,250/mo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-28-2019, 08:04 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
MuffinFlavored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,256
Received 194 Likes on 140 Posts
2018 W213 E 63 S AMG Sedan
F90 M5 leases are going for $1,250/mo

$5k June lease program rebate plus dealers are giving $14k off with minimal effort

MSRP $119,625 Discount -14,106 Lease Rebate -5,000

Sales Price $101,519

36/10K Lease
Residual 55%
Money Factor 0.00165
Payment = $1.178.77 plus tax (at 6-7% you are looking at $1,250/mo - $1,260/mo)
No Cap Reduction, just 1st pmt, DMV and BMW Acq fee, plus some Dealer Fees of $80 Doc Prep & $20 Tire Fee as Total Drive Off

That's a TON of car for the money... I would bet that most E63 leases here (with $0 down towards cap) are $1,800/mo - $2k/mo. Hell... $1,300/mo is C63 money...

I take it Mercedes is going to do pretty much nothing to try to "match" or "compete" with BMW being aggressive on their M5 leases because... Mercedes really doesn't care to subsidize the E63s (or any of the big boy AMGs really) to pad sales numbers? Anybody with any more knowledge on the subject care to share their opinion?
The following users liked this post:
tonecas (06-28-2019)
Old 06-29-2019, 09:45 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto, Ont, Canda
Posts: 2,349
Received 665 Likes on 513 Posts
go fast grocery getter wagon
This lease seems very cheap compared to Canada
Old 06-29-2019, 09:55 AM
  #3  
Member
 
NYC365's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 88
Received 18 Likes on 11 Posts
2016 C450, 2019 E63S
Good, AMG shouldn't drop the price of the E63S to match the M5. If I recall, I don't believe that either car was ever similar with one another in terms of lease rates (with the M5 always being substantially cheaper), but that is something no one really talks about when comparing them. The MSRP never tells the full story... The $145k Maserati GT and $160k BMW i8 are cheaper to lease than the E63S. Keep it exclusive instead of padding sales numbers, it'll attract the right kind of clientele.
The following users liked this post:
Michael Khan (07-01-2019)
Old 06-29-2019, 10:08 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Schnei67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 21
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2017 Audi Q7
If only the good days of the M5 wagon where not over...e36 to be precise.
Old 06-29-2019, 11:34 AM
  #5  
Super Moderator

 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 9,984
Received 3,171 Likes on 1,977 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
MB has no interest in matching the fire sale of M5's. This is nothing new; this that been going on for a long time... BMW would push a ton of inventory to the dealers and market the M-cars at the same MF of other BMW's while offering unrealistic residuals. The loss on these cars would be offset by their SUV profits. It's a numbers game...

That said, the M5 is a fantastic car and an absolute bargain. If the M5 Competition would have been out when we got our E63s, I would have to think twice even though I like the look of our E much better. Am thinking about the M8 but unlike the M5, that car is stupid money...
Old 06-29-2019, 12:09 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Dunga's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 387
Received 109 Likes on 71 Posts
‘22 Ram Limited 4x4, '21 GLE63S, ‘14 Corvette Stingray
Originally Posted by Wolfman
MB has no interest in matching the fire sale of M5's. This is nothing new; this that been going on for a long time... BMW would push a ton of inventory to the dealers and market the M-cars at the same MF of other BMW's while offering unrealistic residuals. The loss on these cars would be offset by their SUV profits. It's a numbers game...

That said, the M5 is a fantastic car and an absolute bargain. If the M5 Competition would have been out when we got our E63s, I would have to think twice even though I like the look of our E much better. Am thinking about the M8 but unlike the M5, that car is stupid money...
Pricing out on the M8 Wolfman or speculation as of now? I’m assuming it’s S63 money??
Old 06-29-2019, 02:08 PM
  #7  
Super Moderator

 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 9,984
Received 3,171 Likes on 1,977 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
Originally Posted by Dunga
Pricing out on the M8 Wolfman or speculation as of now? I’m assuming it’s S63 money??
I think the GT 63s takes the cake at this point. I don't recall the exact math but Vic looked at it and the car optioned is between $3500-$3800 a month leased. That's stupid money!

The M8 will be cheaper of course but the car will cost quite a bit more than the M5 and carries a lower residual if the M850i is an indicator. Comp package is a $13k option on the M8 and with options should quickly hit $160k.
If priced right though, I'll swap the E63s for the M8
Old 06-29-2019, 02:15 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
MuffinFlavored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,256
Received 194 Likes on 140 Posts
2018 W213 E 63 S AMG Sedan
Originally Posted by NYC365
Good, AMG shouldn't drop the price of the E63S to match the M5. If I recall, I don't believe that either car was ever similar with one another in terms of lease rates (with the M5 always being substantially cheaper), but that is something no one really talks about when comparing them. The MSRP never tells the full story... The $145k Maserati GT and $160k BMW i8 are cheaper to lease than the E63S. Keep it exclusive instead of padding sales numbers, it'll attract the right kind of clientele.
i agree, but

are they “keeping it exclusive” by watering down the amg brand with e43 / e53? and is it keeping it exclusive or ripping off their customers/not offering fair deals?
The following users liked this post:
abhatti55 (07-02-2019)
Old 06-29-2019, 02:17 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
MuffinFlavored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,256
Received 194 Likes on 140 Posts
2018 W213 E 63 S AMG Sedan
Originally Posted by Wolfman
I think the GT 63s takes the cake at this point. I don't recall the exact math but Vic looked at it and the car optioned is between $3500-$3800 a month leased. That's stupid money!

The M8 will be cheaper of course but the car will cost quite a bit more than the M5 and carries a lower residual if the M850i is an indicator. Comp package is a $13k option on the M8 and with options should quickly hit $160k.
If priced right though, I'll swap the E63s for the M8
what is your criteria of “price is right” for the m8?
Old 06-29-2019, 02:21 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMG 17GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 3,962
Received 694 Likes on 528 Posts
R Nine T
Nice deal there.

hey wolfman, what about a Porsche 2 door Panny. ? Any word on that car. ?
Old 06-29-2019, 03:06 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Rockland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 441
Received 175 Likes on 111 Posts
Volvo XC90
Originally Posted by Wolfman
MB has no interest in matching the fire sale of M5's. This is nothing new; this that been going on for a long time... BMW would push a ton of inventory to the dealers and market the M-cars at the same MF of other BMW's while offering unrealistic residuals. The loss on these cars would be offset by their SUV profits. I.
Agreed. Nothing new. I am leasing my 2019 M760 that had a $175K MSRP for $1862+ tax with nothing down; probably a comparable payment to a middle of the road S Class.
The following users liked this post:
abhatti55 (07-02-2019)
Old 06-29-2019, 03:19 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMG 17GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 3,962
Received 694 Likes on 528 Posts
R Nine T
Jackie. I’m coming up to alpha next week. You around?
Old 06-29-2019, 03:43 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
MuffinFlavored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,256
Received 194 Likes on 140 Posts
2018 W213 E 63 S AMG Sedan
Originally Posted by Wolfman
MB has no interest in matching the fire sale of M5's. This is nothing new; this that been going on for a long time... BMW would push a ton of inventory to the dealers and market the M-cars at the same MF of other BMW's while offering unrealistic residuals. The loss on these cars would be offset by their SUV profits. It's a numbers game...

That said, the M5 is a fantastic car and an absolute bargain. If the M5 Competition would have been out when we got our E63s, I would have to think twice even though I like the look of our E much better. Am thinking about the M8 but unlike the M5, that car is stupid money...
is that to say AMG lease losses are not offset by CLA250 or SUV profits?
Old 06-29-2019, 05:38 PM
  #14  
Super Moderator

 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 9,984
Received 3,171 Likes on 1,977 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
Originally Posted by MuffinFlavored
what is your criteria of “price is right” for the m8?
Ideally, just a touch above the M5 comp. Thinking $125k - $130k with M8 Comp. with CCB's At this point, they are listing at $143k base
Old 06-29-2019, 05:40 PM
  #15  
Super Moderator

 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 9,984
Received 3,171 Likes on 1,977 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
Originally Posted by AMG 17GT
Nice deal there.

hey wolfman, what about a Porsche 2 door Panny. ? Any word on that car. ?
We are on the list for a Taycan. I cannot fall in love with a Panny. Great car but not for me...
Old 06-29-2019, 06:48 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
MuffinFlavored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,256
Received 194 Likes on 140 Posts
2018 W213 E 63 S AMG Sedan
Originally Posted by Wolfman
Ideally, just a touch above the M5 comp. Thinking $125k - $130k with M8 Comp. with CCB's At this point, they are listing at $143k base
M8 should be same power + performance of M5, right? the same way M6 + M5 were on par?
Old 06-29-2019, 11:00 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Dunga's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 387
Received 109 Likes on 71 Posts
‘22 Ram Limited 4x4, '21 GLE63S, ‘14 Corvette Stingray
Originally Posted by MuffinFlavored
M8 should be same power + performance of M5, right? the same way M6 + M5 were on par?
Well if it’s poised to be as the coupe version of the 7 series, isn’t it more in line with the S class coupe? Pricing for that is obviously higher than the regular S class sedan. The 4 series is the coupe version of the 3 series. Unless I’m mistaking something. I’ve never owned a Bimmer although I’d come very close.
Old 06-29-2019, 11:31 PM
  #18  
Super Moderator

 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 9,984
Received 3,171 Likes on 1,977 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
Originally Posted by Dunga
Well if it’s poised to be as the coupe version of the 7 series, isn’t it more in line with the S class coupe? Pricing for that is obviously higher than the regular S class sedan. The 4 series is the coupe version of the 3 series. Unless I’m mistaking something. I’ve never owned a Bimmer although I’d come very close.
It’s a bit faster than the M5 Comp due to weight. I assume it’s a 2.8 sec. car. Easily tunable.

I just have have to get over the Mustang profile.
Old 06-29-2019, 11:56 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
MuffinFlavored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,256
Received 194 Likes on 140 Posts
2018 W213 E 63 S AMG Sedan
Originally Posted by Wolfman
It’s a bit faster than the M5 Comp due to weight. I assume it’s a 2.8 sec. car. Easily tunable.

I just have have to get over the Mustang profile.
> easy tunable

did you see the post on m5post where the guy with a stage 1 DME blew his block? $60k repair, no warranty
Old 06-29-2019, 11:56 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
MuffinFlavored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,256
Received 194 Likes on 140 Posts
2018 W213 E 63 S AMG Sedan
Originally Posted by Dunga
Well if it’s poised to be as the coupe version of the 7 series, isn’t it more in line with the S class coupe? Pricing for that is obviously higher than the regular S class sedan. The 4 series is the coupe version of the 3 series. Unless I’m mistaking something. I’ve never owned a Bimmer although I’d come very close.
i always saw it as a rename of the m6, and they just planned on killing the 6 series? killing -> renaming
Old 06-30-2019, 12:13 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Dunga's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 387
Received 109 Likes on 71 Posts
‘22 Ram Limited 4x4, '21 GLE63S, ‘14 Corvette Stingray
Originally Posted by MuffinFlavored
i always saw it as a rename of the m6, and they just planned on killing the 6 series? killing -> renaming
I suppose you’re right. They haven’t said anything about a 6 series and it would have been due now after the 5. Unless they’re worried it would cannibalize the sales of the 8. I don’t get what they’re doing to their branding.
Old 06-30-2019, 08:35 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
MuffinFlavored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,256
Received 194 Likes on 140 Posts
2018 W213 E 63 S AMG Sedan
Originally Posted by Dunga
I suppose you’re right. They haven’t said anything about a 6 series and it would have been due now after the 5. Unless they’re worried it would cannibalize the sales of the 8. I don’t get what they’re doing to their branding.
I don’t get why BMW “wants” to have cheap leases for the M5 (to get it into the hands of as many as possible) but AMG doesn’t?
Old 06-30-2019, 12:19 PM
  #23  
Super Moderator

 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 9,984
Received 3,171 Likes on 1,977 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
BMW has been killing off the 6 series due to slow sales. The 8 series was fashioned after the S-Class coupe/cab in terms of high-end, low volume specialty car. One of their execs said at the time that if they can't sell a lot of them, might as well make more money on each car.
That said, they haven't succeeded. The S-Class coupe has no B-pillars and is airy and luxurious. The M8 has quality materials but is functional instead of luxurious and the interior is dark and cramped.

Still not bad though. It is a very capable car. Just like Porsche, the M5/8 has a more compliant chassis than the E63s with an actual Comfort mode. My wife will appreciate that Still BMW is delusional and thinks that the car is a Porsche Turbo killer. This is a go-fast GT.
Old 06-30-2019, 12:21 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
MuffinFlavored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,256
Received 194 Likes on 140 Posts
2018 W213 E 63 S AMG Sedan
Originally Posted by Wolfman
BMW has been killing off the 6 series due to slow sales. The 8 series was fashioned after the S-Class coupe/cab in terms of high-end, low volume specialty car. One of their execs said at the time that if they can't sell a lot of them, might as well make more money on each car.
That said, they haven't succeeded. The S-Class coupe has no B-pillars and is airy and luxurious. The M8 has quality materials but is functional instead of luxurious and the interior is dark and cramped.

Still not bad though. It is a very capable car. Just like Porsche, the M5/8 has a more compliant chassis than the E63s with an actual Comfort mode. My wife will appreciate that Still BMW is delusional and thinks that the car is a Porsche Turbo killer. This is a go-fast GT.
i don’t wanna start a flame war but i feel like one well respected guy on the forums said “ouch, my back, the e63s is so stiff” and everybody just ran with it

maybe i haven’t driven in a honda civic recently enough to know what “not stiff” is, but none of my wives/girlfriends tell me my e63s is viagra stiff

it seems like anything that can’t be numerically measured (like how stiff a car is) will forever be up for eternal debate...
The following users liked this post:
Mandarin (06-30-2019)
Old 06-30-2019, 12:46 PM
  #25  
Super Moderator

 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 9,984
Received 3,171 Likes on 1,977 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
Originally Posted by MuffinFlavored
i don’t wanna start a flame war but i feel like one well respected guy on the forums said “ouch, my back, the e63s is so stiff” and everybody just ran with it

maybe i haven’t driven in a honda civic recently enough to know what “not stiff” is, but none of my wives/girlfriends tell me my e63s is viagra stiff

it seems like anything that can’t be numerically measured (like how stiff a car is) will forever be up for eternal debate...
I know this has been debate and I personally don't mind the firm setup at all. Every household has a slightly different setup of how cars are used so I can only speak for myself. My wife and I ride share a lot (own company) and she has had some spine surgeries. As such her ride comfort matters. Since she like to drive fast there isn't a lot of controversy on the cars themselves.
The E63s is firmness could be fixed in seconds by just calibrating the suspensions air pressure for that setting. It wouldn't make the car less sporty. Our AMG GTC has the Dynamic Plus package and sport suspension, yet it is more compliant and also more capable at speed. Less compromise there.

In an ideal world we would all have fantastic roads and none of this would actually matter


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: F90 M5 leases are going for $1,250/mo



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 PM.