some guy on IG told me he ran 5.2s 100-200km/h and i compared it to my 8.5s stock pulls to come up with this
Quote:
4.8s @ 930whp (turbos, meth, race gas, catless downpipes, ECU, TCU, CPC)?
5.2s @ 865whp (turbos, meth, race gas, catless downpipes, ECU, TCU, CPC)
5.5s @ 815whp (turbos, catless downpipes, ECU, TCU, CPC)?
6.0s @ 750whp (turbos, catless downpipes, ECU, TCU, CPC)?
6.5s @ 690whp (stage 2 ECU tune, downpipes, CPC tune)?
7.0s @ 640whp (stage 2 ECU tune, downpipes)?
7.5s @ 600whp (stage 1 ECU tune)
8.0s @ 560whp (stage 1 ECU tune)
8.5s @ 530whp (stock)
if anybody disagrees/has better data to input, i would be interested in hearing it so i can rerun the numbers. i just did simple percentage scaling with a few data points i have4.8s @ 930whp (turbos, meth, race gas, catless downpipes, ECU, TCU, CPC)?
5.2s @ 865whp (turbos, meth, race gas, catless downpipes, ECU, TCU, CPC)
5.5s @ 815whp (turbos, catless downpipes, ECU, TCU, CPC)?
6.0s @ 750whp (turbos, catless downpipes, ECU, TCU, CPC)?
6.5s @ 690whp (stage 2 ECU tune, downpipes, CPC tune)?
7.0s @ 640whp (stage 2 ECU tune, downpipes)?
7.5s @ 600whp (stage 1 ECU tune)
8.0s @ 560whp (stage 1 ECU tune)
8.5s @ 530whp (stock)
Senior Member
Quote:
if anybody disagrees/has better data to input, i would be interested in hearing it so i can rerun the numbers. i just did simple percentage scaling with a few data points i have
I think that looks pretty good. I ran a 6.2 and I知 guessing I知 around 700-750Originally Posted by MuffinFlavored
some guy on IG told me he ran 5.2s 100-200km/h and i compared it to my 8.5s stock pulls to come up with thisif anybody disagrees/has better data to input, i would be interested in hearing it so i can rerun the numbers. i just did simple percentage scaling with a few data points i have
Quote:
did you get your cpc done? did it make a difference?Originally Posted by apsuard
I think that looks pretty good. I ran a 6.2 and I知 guessing I知 around 700-750
buy this $15 tactrix cable from china if you don稚 have one already and i値l send you my logger so we can see what痴 going on
i wanna see your psi boost target, your ignition timing, your commanded torque, etc.
E634Me
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateMay 2017
- LocationSouthern California
- Posts:1,726
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2018 E63S AMG
-
Likes:193
-
Liked:605 Times in 417 Posts
Have you looked at CANable? https://canable.io/
Slightly more expensive but open source and I don't believe it is made in China.
Slightly more expensive but open source and I don't believe it is made in China.
Quote:
Slightly more expensive but open source and I don't believe it is made in China.
i wrote a userspace driver for thisOriginally Posted by E634Me
Have you looked at CANable? https://canable.io/Slightly more expensive but open source and I don't believe it is made in China.
i have 3-4 of them
tactrix openport comes with obd port, no need for special cable
and is cheaper/more popular
but my logger will work with that as well
canable also out of stock btw
stage 3+ ($3.5k turbos, $800 turbo labor, $1.5k downpipes, $500 downpipe labor, $2k ECU tune, $1.5k CPC tune, $1.8k TCU tune + $1.5k for meth kit + $500 for meth labor + $150 for a few gallons of race gas)
---
4.8s-5.2s @ 865whp-930whp (turbos, meth, race gas, catless downpipes, ECU, TCU, CPC)?
stage 3 ($3.5k turbos, $800 turbo labor, $1.5k downpipes, $500 downpipe labor, $2k ECU tune, $1.5k CPC tune, $1.8k TCU tune)
---
5.5s-6.0s @ 750whp-815whp (turbos, catless downpipes, ECU, TCU, CPC)
stage 2 ($2k-$3k tune, $1.5k downpipes, $500 downpipe labor, $1.5k-2k CPC tune)
---
6.5s-7.0s @ 640whp-690whp (stage 2 ECU tune, catless downpipes, CPC tune)?
stage 1 ($2k-$3k tune)
---
7.5s-8.0s @ 560whp-600whp (ECU tune)
stock
---
8.5s @ 530whp
updated to include some costs, pick your poison guys!
---
4.8s-5.2s @ 865whp-930whp (turbos, meth, race gas, catless downpipes, ECU, TCU, CPC)?
stage 3 ($3.5k turbos, $800 turbo labor, $1.5k downpipes, $500 downpipe labor, $2k ECU tune, $1.5k CPC tune, $1.8k TCU tune)
---
5.5s-6.0s @ 750whp-815whp (turbos, catless downpipes, ECU, TCU, CPC)
stage 2 ($2k-$3k tune, $1.5k downpipes, $500 downpipe labor, $1.5k-2k CPC tune)
---
6.5s-7.0s @ 640whp-690whp (stage 2 ECU tune, catless downpipes, CPC tune)?
stage 1 ($2k-$3k tune)
---
7.5s-8.0s @ 560whp-600whp (ECU tune)
stock
---
8.5s @ 530whp
updated to include some costs, pick your poison guys!
raudiace4
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateJun 2014
- LocationIL
- Posts:1,589
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive19 E63s, 23 M3 compX, B9 SQ5
-
Likes:395
-
Liked:683 Times in 378 Posts
Looks like the CPC/TCU mod is a must.
Senior Member
Quote:
buy this $15 tactrix cable from china if you don稚 have one already and i値l send you my logger so we can see what痴 going on
i wanna see your psi boost target, your ignition timing, your commanded torque, etc.
I got CPC via Edok. It definitely made a difference. Best 1/4 mile I did prior was 10.5-10.6 range at 130. Ran a 10.39 at 133 after CPC. I知 still on stock turbo and haven稚 done TCU tune. My guess is CPC tune will matter more when you upgrade turbos. Where CPC really helps is 60-130 since my car was a dog before CPC. Even after CPC my best 60-130 is 7.2 so my guess is stock turbos are maxed out.Originally Posted by MuffinFlavored
did you get your cpc done? did it make a difference?buy this $15 tactrix cable from china if you don稚 have one already and i値l send you my logger so we can see what痴 going on
i wanna see your psi boost target, your ignition timing, your commanded torque, etc.
I emailed you two JB4 logs.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
ExploreQuote:
I emailed you two JB4 logs.
7.2s 60-130 with what mods?Originally Posted by apsuard
I got CPC via Edok. It definitely made a difference. Best 1/4 mile I did prior was 10.5-10.6 range at 130. Ran a 10.39 at 133 after CPC. I知 still on stock turbo and haven稚 done TCU tune. My guess is CPC tune will matter more when you upgrade turbos. Where CPC really helps is 60-130 since my car was a dog before CPC. Even after CPC my best 60-130 is 7.2 so my guess is stock turbos are maxed out.I emailed you two JB4 logs.
ecu tune
cpc tune
catless downpipes
airfilters
meth? or did you stop running meth?
Senior Member
Quote:
ecu tune
cpc tune
catless downpipes
airfilters
meth? or did you stop running meth?
ECU tune, CPC tune, catless downpipes, filters, 50/50 methOriginally Posted by MuffinFlavored
7.2s 60-130 with what mods?ecu tune
cpc tune
catless downpipes
airfilters
meth? or did you stop running meth?
raudiace4
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateJun 2014
- LocationIL
- Posts:1,589
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive19 E63s, 23 M3 compX, B9 SQ5
-
Likes:395
-
Liked:683 Times in 378 Posts
Quote:
I emailed you two JB4 logs.
That's pretty impressive. Are you planning to do the TCU tune? Originally Posted by apsuard
I got CPC via Edok. It definitely made a difference. Best 1/4 mile I did prior was 10.5-10.6 range at 130. Ran a 10.39 at 133 after CPC. I知 still on stock turbo and haven稚 done TCU tune. My guess is CPC tune will matter more when you upgrade turbos. Where CPC really helps is 60-130 since my car was a dog before CPC. Even after CPC my best 60-130 is 7.2 so my guess is stock turbos are maxed out.I emailed you two JB4 logs.
what is 7.2s 60-130mph approximately converted to 100-200kmh?
Senior Member
Quote:
That same run I was 6.2s 100-200Originally Posted by MuffinFlavored
what is 7.2s 60-130mph approximately converted to 100-200kmh?
Senior Member
Quote:
I would only do TCU tune if I go hybrid turbos. I would raise my race start to 4500 rpm also.Originally Posted by raudiace4
That's pretty impressive. Are you planning to do the TCU tune?
If I was keeping the car I would do pure 1000 and tcu tune but my friend is buying in January and he can spend his money on the car

Im moving onto a F90 M5 and I知 going to build the motor and trans and go all out. Will try to build a 9.5 s car.
Quote:
6.2s 100-200 = 7.2s 60-130? am i reading that right? that sounds wrongOriginally Posted by apsuard
That same run I was 6.2s 100-200
Senior Member
Quote:
To be exact It was 7.23 60-130 and 6.25 100-200. Exact same run.Originally Posted by MuffinFlavored
6.2s 100-200 = 7.2s 60-130? am i reading that right? that sounds wrong
It is correct. Looking at my dragy now.
To me it totally makes sense. 100-200 is 62-124 roughly. It makes sense you gain 1 second because those extra 6 mph from 124-130 are slow due to our small turbos.





