E63 wagon off MBUSA site




https://www.mbusa.com/en/vehicles/class/e-class/wagon
However, the sedan remains: https://www.mbusa.com/en/vehicles/build/e-class/sedan




Last edited by Carac; Oct 20, 2021 at 11:10 AM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Of course the A-T has none of the E63’s ultimate performance, drama, or cool factor.




Of course, the A-T has none of the E63’s ultimate performance, drama, or cool factor.
Of course the A-T has none of the E63’s ultimate performance, drama, or cool factor.
After my E63 wagon arrived in ~June we tried to get a second one for my wife and get her out of a '20 Cayenne GTS because the MB wagon offers: performance, lower ride height which helps her haul her parents/wheel chairs/etc., and of course a real flat back seat for bicycle races, etc. Local dealer who could not get me my wagon, offered a short test ride in a E450. Long story short, yes, I drove it, and she drove it and the test drive left us unimpressed. Mind you the car was not for me, so I kept my subjective styling biases to myself.
What you liked regarding the mild hybrid being well integrated with the ICE can be felt at part throttle light load and you can feel the switching. Modern and sophisticated to you, feels like a small engine working hard with the batteries which is fine, but you can feel that.
Please don't make the mistake of quoting zero to 60 times. How power is delivered and felt in the driver's seat is not measured by those numbers. This is why I don't own a Plaid. I will give you a real life example from my "customer" my wife. She has had 4 Cayennes, all new, but we won't talk about the first one that was a lemon! Her 2010 Cayenne GTS 957.2 (V8) to her 2017 Cayenne GTS958.2 (V6TT) to 2020 Cayenne GTS 9Y0 (V8TT) all had reasonably impressive zero to 60, "somewhat" similar power/torque levels, but absolutely different feel from the driver's seat. The first being high on low end torque due to a high displacement NA V8 engine, second an absolute disaster with a small displacement V6 engine and two hard working turbos, and finally the last where you had both the V8, the displacement, and the turbos...
That's about it. She now drives an E63 wagon and I don't since we could not get another one.
If you have an E450, congratulations, no disrespect. Enough on this topic for me, normally I keep my negative comments to myself!
Last edited by Igooz; Oct 21, 2021 at 04:58 PM.
Looking at the torque curves of the respective MB wagons, they are basically identical to 1,500 RPM, where they are both at ~370. The A-T plateaus there, while the E63 continues to build to 2,500 if your foot is in it. IMO (and everbody's that I've read), any perceptible ignition/shutoff starting up/slowing down with the mild hybrid is much less obtrusive than the stop/start of the V8. So I guess we will agree to disagree.
Of course 0-60 times are relatively meaningless, but anything in the mid-4s is a quick vehicle. That 0-60 and 5-60 are closer in the A-T than the E63 also indicates less turbo lag with the mild hybrid.
Don't get me wrong...if I get the A-T, I will trade it for a 2023 E63 wagon immediately if/when they become available. But not because I think the E63 is a better daily driver in any way.
So what did you end up with?
https://www.mbusa.com/en/vehicles/class/e-class/wagon
However, the sedan remains: https://www.mbusa.com/en/vehicles/build/e-class/sedan








