CLK55 AMG Rotors ... replace after 2 hours on the track?
On Monday the brakes were feeling and sounding like I needed new pads. Off to my friendly dealer.
Today I'm told that the heat build-up trashed the rotors. The local dealer/service-guy says that the car isn't designed to run a track. I find this VERY hard to believe! Isn't the AMG on a par with M3's in terms of their performance capabilities. THe rear brakes were also scarred, according to them; but probably didn't absolutely need replacement.
Is it possible the rotors were defective? How could this have happened? I'm shocked. And $800 poorer!
How hard should I push Mercedes on this, do you think?
I'd appreciate your collective advice.
Last edited by Mike_Virginia; Nov 18, 2003 at 05:38 PM.
Did he say the pads were worn? Warped rotor?
Next time, I would refrain from sharing details with the dealer (e.g., the fact that you were on the track). It is none of their business.
The first problem is that the rotors are one piece solid. (Note that W202/W208 AMG brakes are not like that.)
The second major problem is that the rotors are made in only a left-hand application. That means there is a rotor for the left side... and a left side rotor for the right side. So that rotor does not cool properly.
Thirdly, the swept area and pad contact area are not that large. Again, compare with W202/W208/W210 AMG brakes.
Search on mbworld for past discussions on the left/right problem, and comparisons of brakes.
Conclusion: AMG brakes are now just for looks and low cost. Be glad that your rotors cost under $70 a piece, while the older AMG brake rotors were $400 each initially (now down to a bit above $200).
-s-
Does it mean even with AMG cars, they are cutting corners?
The brakes on street cars are not supposed to stand up to track duty. Even aftermarket parts go quick in track work. Porsche's carbon fiber upgrade might be an exception to this rule.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG



