URGENT: NHTSA Opens investigation into fuel leaks on the W211 E Class
) and decided to ask about my 04 E55 gas leak. The service manager said that it wasn't under any recall and that I should bring it in to have them see what is leaking. I told him I knew all about the current recall investigation and that only a new tank and both sending units would fix it. He offered to pay for 50% of the $2000 repair. After a few more minutes of talking about lawsuits and the news media he offered to pay for 75%. I might pay 25% just to get my car safe and hope I get my money back from a lawsuit or recall. He said the new orange top sending units they are using now are known to leak too and they might have to re-engineer everything again. I also sent a complaint to the EPA to see if they want to get involved.




filled up the tank today and the gas nozzle clicked but the fuel gauge was just above 3/4's as it will not fill up all the way any more the car.
i just wanna
this thing
http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/acms/cs...01&docType=INV
Hit the link and you will see the new response from MBUSA as of this morning.
As usual MBUSA is denying any wrong doing.
Basically the manufacturer's attorney is claiming the issue is present due to the dealer or independent Mercedes repair centers fixing gas tanks improperly.
Another argument is the small amount of complaints vs. vehicles produced.
Excuse me but one or two cars leaking gas fumes is just too much.
In any event it looks like Mercedes will not be voluntarily issuing a recall.
When i talked the the engineer at NHTSA, he was a tad bit surprised at their response.
But I'm sure he's hear excuses like that before.
If you haven't had filed a complaint, please file right away.
If you need help i will be willing to walk you through it.
One of Mercedes strong arguments is there is not enough complaints registered vs. actual W211 E Class production. It's a low percentage.
Last edited by moosejaw; May 1, 2012 at 04:45 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
MB will have to burn first I guess to get action but only if you call it in first.
From reading MB's response, they claimed there is low risk of ignition from any leaked fuel, either because any leaked fuel is contained in a depression on top of the tank, or because any object in the vicinity of leaked fuel is not hot enough to cause ignition. But what about accumulated vapors in an enclosed area? Surely that is a risk.
There is an additional avenue to explore. If this isn't a "safety" issue because of a low probabilty of ignition, can it instead be framed as an evaporative emissions issue?
There are lots of reasons why reported instances are low compared to the population--perhaps owners have been simply fixing the problems out-of-pocket without pursuing manufacturer involvement.
In general, MB's initial response to the NHTSA inquiry is exactly what should be expected--a standard legal response is to deny all allegations and assert that there is no valid claim.




i figured they would cover the e55's (and 63's) at first since 1) that's where the bulk of the problems are showing up, 2) they already had a recall for e55's that was not effective, and 3) the volume of e55's/63's out there vs non-amg E-classes is very small.
i wonder if it has anything to do with the fuel consumption of the cars. i mean the e55's/63's do use/burn more fuel (meaning more fuel going through the tank) than say e500's/550's and e320's/350's (maybe that's the reason being you don't hear of as many e500's/550's and barely any e320's/350's (except me of course what else is new lol
)). then the ethanol issue would kind of make sense since more amounts of ethanol have gone through the tank and deteriorated it.
Last edited by gaazmon; May 2, 2012 at 01:42 PM.
)). then the ethanol issue would kind of make sense since more amounts of ethanol have gone through the tank and deteriorated it.I have seen reports from other countries such as Australia where the E also has this problem. Australia also has 10% ethanol like us. Now in countries where I have not seen this problem, ie.Germany and Canada (which do not have ethanol in their premium gasoline), they do not have this problem.
This issue has filtered down the C55 as well.




I have seen reports from other countries such as Australia where the E also has this problem. Australia also has 10% ethanol like us. Now in countries where I have not seen this problem, ie.Germany and Canada (which do not have ethanol in their premium gasoline), they do not have this problem.
This issue has filtered down the C55 as well.
interesting thing about australia, i was in sydney for about three weeks in march staying with a cousin of mine and his family. i remember when going to some of the gas stations they had E10 91 (instead of regular 91, which is there regular gas, he said). i asked him what E10 meant and he said it's got 10% ethanol and said how he always tells his kids never to use it since it will ruin the cars (he's a mechanic out there) even though they all drive newer cars (MY2007+).
the c55's as well??? jeez this is becoming really bad. at first i thought it was only to the prefacelift E's, now it's even gone further than just the E/CLS platform cars
Last edited by gaazmon; May 3, 2012 at 02:01 PM.
Don't quote me on this one, i only glanced over the article.
Don't quote me on this one, i only glanced over the article.
It was a matter of time only with fuel leaking IN the car. NTSA doesn't use out of country data.Could not possibly be ethanol, all the politicians tell use it works and not a problem. SO there issue solved not ethanol politicians say so!.
Unfortunately engineers don't say the same thing but who listens to an engineer anyway.
Don't quote me on this one, i only glanced over the article.




Don't quote me on this one, i only glanced over the article.
that's horrible. If the article was online please provide the link for all of us as well. The NHTSA needs to see that.
DailyTelegraph
TOTALLY INCINERATED: Horror car smash victims had no chance
From: DailyTelegraph
May 03, 2012
A FIERY crash has claimed three lives and left investigators baffled at its cause.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/new...-1226346095934
Last edited by AMG903L; May 19, 2012 at 07:06 PM. Reason: add







