beating an m3 3times - VIDEO 30mb
wow man you take everything people say to the T
when I said there were dead even I ment on one of the races.They raced a few times right????????
Friggin' pathetic. You're what, 14? Punk...
Can you post some pics of your cars? Perhaps one with a printout of a post of this thread on the seat so we know it's yours? As often as I've caught you lying, I don't believe a damn thing you have to say....http://www.m3forum.net/m3forum/showthread.php?t=75870
hahahah oh no im banned from a online website!!! ....get a life
But let's just ignore me & my car for a minute.

And then, what do you do? Go right back to omitting pertinant data--as you always do.
In the second place, as usual you purposefully omit pertinant data. Here is the post where Dracco121 reported on the race results; you might remember this, as this was the race where you were invited, promised to show, and then pussed out and didn't show up. So, what pertinant data did you omit?
So, far from being the blowout that you're making it out to be, it was one for the M, one for the C.
Priceless, loser!
my day car was an 83 turbo d.I don't have to prove anything to you.
I just traded it in 6days ago for a mini van(for my buisness)and my father has an old 300d also.
im sure you had you own buisness at 20 and droped 30k for a car at that age.
show me in that video where the c32 beat the m 3 times
I saw one win and another the m got the jump and another being dead even.So ill say it again there are neck to neck.
go watch it again
my day car was an 83 turbo d.I don't have to prove anything to you.

Last edited by Improviz; Jul 13, 2005 at 02:24 AM.
Yup, thanks... i'd definately take an old M3 over the new one, its not as fast in a straight line but it sounds 1 million times better and it dominates all on the track (car and driver best handling car of any price 4 years in arow). anyways im glad yall enjoyed the video
I saw one win and another the m got the jump and another being dead even.So ill say it again there are neck to neck.
Last edited by Improviz; Jul 13, 2005 at 02:34 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I saw one win and another the m got the jump and another being dead even.So ill say it again there are neck to neck.
Last edited by Improviz; Jul 13, 2005 at 02:33 AM.
I saw one win and another the m got the jump and another being dead even.So ill say it again there are neck to neck.
And yeah the C55 won 1 run & the kid in the M3 the other. But his fastest time was faster than the C55's fastest time. Either way, the cars are pretty close which is what I've been saying from the beginning.
BAck to the topic, here's a test done on the same day, same fuel, same driver, etc at 5500ft elevation. M3 SMG vs C32:
http://www.diskdrive.co.za/road_test...g_vs_c32k.html

And yeah the C55 won 1 run & the kid in the M3 the other. But his fastest time was faster than the C55's fastest time. Either way, the cars are pretty close which is what I've been saying from the beginning.
BAck to the topic, here's a test done on the same day, same fuel, same driver, etc at 5500ft elevation. M3 SMG vs C32:
http://www.diskdrive.co.za/road_test...g_vs_c32k.html
btw, you sure makes a lot of assumption on who runs on what fuel at drag strip. Now you are saying the silver c55 (which you claim to be your friend's car or at least someone you konw) always run on good fuel, yet you fail to mention again in the video that you have shown before you have already said the silver car was running on stock tires, barely broken in, and running on 95 octane instead of your 100-95/98 mix. volunteered my ***...you did not mention you had brand new tires and race fuel mix until I've asked many times in the first thread you ever appeared in.
LMAO...you are fuking pathetic.
oh yeah, didn't you say the lane you were in had better traction? which in one of your little video it even shows the silver C55 had to start on the right side of his track to avoid slipping which he did anyway.
And you weren't there so please stop talking bull. I ran 13.7 in the left lane where the C55 was. I have the slip. The left lane has better traction off the centre when it's unprepped. In the video that was my slowest run & the C55's fastest run.
We have run again since at a sea level track & the C55's fastest time was 13.3. I have run 13.0 at sea-level stock & my buddy with another stock 6MT ran 13.1. We both trapped higher than both C55's. Another buddy with a M-coupe ran 13.0 as well (stock).
Fact is the cars are closely matched with the M3 having the slight edge. This has been published all over the wolrd press. I don't think I need to repost the links to all the mags that have tested these cars.
http://www.germantechnik.com/images/c32vsm3.wmv
Original thread about the race. Notice both owners of the cars respond to the thread to verify the race went down fairly:
http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum...ght=sticky+c32
I WAS THERE !!!!!!!!!
the C32 DID pull ahead all 3 times. only reason M3 was ever ahead was b/c of premature jump or its slightly better throttle responce thereby giving him the jump. but in the end if you watch closely C32 always pulls ahead.
I have a E36 M3, I am a M3 diehard and even I know C32 is faster car (in a STRAIGHT line). however, i have beaten a C32 AMG on the race track (circuit style, not drag strip) when i was only a lightly modded AUTO back in the day and still dominated him easily, but thats different story. Roozy's stock C32 has beaten supercharged S2000's, highly modified stage2 and higher S4's, and many other cars that on paper it should have lost to. C32 is an underrated car, its that simple.
Last edited by Bernanke; Jul 13, 2005 at 11:11 AM.
I guess you skipped right past the video and link to the race thread above showing just the opposite.
I guess you skipped right past the video and link to the race thread above showing just the opposite.

m-phibian, so if i have consistent 13.0-13.2 timeslips in decent weather are you saying an e46 m3 will still beat me everytime?
both cars are consistent low 13's stock
both cars are consistent low 13's stock
I'm sure your car is fast...but I've seen 2 SMG cars run 13.0X @ 107-108 on *stock* tires..and a 6-MT run 12.7X @ 107.7 on *stock tires*. Who knows what they woud have ran on drag radials.
I know your 13.2 was on the stock tires...and your 12.9 was on Nitto drags. So I only count your 13.2 as an accurate indication of what your car runs stock.
Last edited by M-phibian; Jul 13, 2005 at 04:17 PM.
And you weren't there so please stop talking bull. I ran 13.7 in the left lane where the C55 was. I have the slip. The left lane has better traction off the centre when it's unprepped. In the video that was my slowest run & the C55's fastest run.
We have run again since at a sea level track & the C55's fastest time was 13.3. I have run 13.0 at sea-level stock & my buddy with another stock 6MT ran 13.1. We both trapped higher than both C55's. Another buddy with a M-coupe ran 13.0 as well (stock).
Fact is the cars are closely matched with the M3 having the slight edge. This has been published all over the wolrd press. I don't think I need to repost the links to all the mags that have tested these cars.
and once again like you always do...changing the subject.
I guess you skipped right past the video and link to the race thread above showing just the opposite.

credibility?! coming from a guy with 12 total post, unknown location, and reason to even be here. HA
credibility?! coming from a guy with 12 total post, unknown location, and reason to even be here. HA

I sure hope the majority of MB owners are smarter than yourself there, genius.








