





C230, poor man's Mercedes?
but is C230 a true MB? standard model with no leather, no CD, no power seat etc....a hatch back? what u think?
ENDING POLE 8/16/02 something to say~
well, i don't have to say any more coz 41% of ppls agree dat c230k is as cheap as they looks (maybe not the owner, who knows and who cares other than themselves)~ and 59% of ppls don't~
forums are places where ppl can post their opinions and see how others will react~ for those of u getting so angery @ my opinion, u guyz sure entertained me very much & i like to say thank u~ 84 posts on my pole~
Last edited by psun786; Aug 16, 2002 at 08:15 PM.
Drove one today, and its AWESOME. the v8 sounds so luscious.
However, the 55 thousand dollar MB didnt feel THAT much different then my 230k. Switchgear is similiar, the feel is similiar, it was like a fancier version of my car, in fact it was a little less mb then mine, it lacked the phone, comand, and a cd changer
Last edited by greg230; Aug 15, 2002 at 09:20 PM.
but is C230 a true MB? standard model with no leather, no CD, no power seat etc....a hatch back? what u think?
First, MB has an A class, just because its not offered in the US doesn't mean there aren't cheaper priced MBs.
Second, My C230K is going to cost me $41K CND, which is more than a C240. Sure its not a $59K CLK, but its all about building brand loyalty and getting new buyers, and making more money, so:
If my first car was a Toyota, I'd end up buying a Lexus.
If my first car was a VW, I'd end up buying an Audi.
If my first car was a Nissan, I'd end up buying an Infiniti.
If my first car was a Ford, I'd end up buying a Lincoln.
If my first car was a Chevy, I'd end up buying a Cadillac.
Get the hint? Its about building brand loyalty.
Do you even have a C230? I Are you some ***** from a Bimmer board. If I buy a used CLK or SLK thats under $30K is that a poor mans Mercedes?
i am sure with introduction of C230 & a tag of under $3,0000. MB was able to attract a different crowd of ppl to own a MB.
but is C230 a true MB? standard model with no leather, no CD, no power seat etc....a hatch back? what u think?
2) Leather, CD, power seats...can be had on almost any car nowadays. Those features do not make the car a MB. IMO, safety, engineering and solid drive are the features that characterize MB. I bought the C230k because it is a hatchback. I wanted a good, sporty hatchback and the c coupe was the one I liked best. The fact that it was a MB was a bonus. Deb
Trending Topics
I may be poor, but somehow I don't feel it when driving my C230K. A Jaguar with cloth seats may be a no-no, but a Benz is not about leather & wood to me. Being from Benzland, I've enjoyed too many without leather, which is overrated in my view. If the cloth is nicely done I prefer it over leather. Although I must admit that Tommy's smurf hide seats and shift boot are very tempting!!!
I drove a new E-class Avantgarde CDI last summer on the Autobahn, and frankly, the Coupe feels like it's in the same class as far as materials, solidity, and workmanship. Any quality complaints must be due to the complexity and the electronics. No excuse, but that will naturally increase chances something goes wrong. I'm sure that goes for the higher-end models, too, although I haven't done any research to that effect, lazy ******* that I am. So again, I'm a poor man driving a rich-feeling car, that's that. If that's not enough prestige for you, get a Cadillac!
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Last edited by preyx; Aug 15, 2002 at 10:54 PM.
Like you, I own a C320, and I've driven a Coupe as well. I'll tell you frankly, sitting in the driver's seat and looking forward, you can't tell a dime's difference between the two, plus they have the same build feel, same ride quality, etc.
There was a member with an E-Class posting several months ago that he traded his E on the C-Sedan, because it had the same feel as his E, and he enjoyed driving the C-Class more. So, where does that leave us? Basically, a MB is a MB. It's all good.
If my first car was a Toyota, I'd end up buying a Lexus.
If my first car was a VW, I'd end up buying an Audi.
If my first car was a Nissan, I'd end up buying an Infiniti.
If my first car was a Ford, I'd end up buying a Lincoln.
If my first car was a Chevy, I'd end up buying a Cadillac.
Get the hint? Its about building brand loyalty.
Yes - the C32 is an AMG, but it is also still a C-Class.
Last edited by Accord; Aug 15, 2002 at 10:32 PM.
I am trading my S500 for a C32 AMG. Why? Because I enjoy driving the C32 much more than the boring S500.
Yes - the C32 is an AMG, but it is still also a C-Class. I am trading my S-Class in for a C-Class.
you are capitalism's poster child.
I'm 26, work VERY hard and the c230 is my FIRST car. It's not easy taken the TTC ( all you toronto peoples now what i mean ) for 25 years and then turn around and by a MERCEDES-BENZ.
It is insulting to hear the term "low end". My c230 ended up costing me over $48K... If you don't own a Mercedez, you'll never be able to understand the "Feeling" you have when you sit in the car and drive, the speed limit mind you so people can see. I haven't seen may on the road, which makes mine a deffinate looker. I even considered the 325ci, but the fact is BMW is everywhere, common is something i was NOT going for. I feel pride to the fact that i drive a MB, base model or option filled. The funnt thing is, even the base model is BETTER equipped than a BMW, LEXUS to some respects regarding safety/security...
Don't call this a "poor man's MB"... It's a slap in the face to MB, and the owners who take pride in their accomplishments.
Regardless of what model MB you drive, It's an MB, it will retain it's value for a looong time and put a sense of joy during my driveing time. $50K ain't cheap! Definately NOT a poor mans car...
Don't knock the hustle...
Get real, I'm 18 years old and drive a nicer car than most kids my age that I know. Any mercedes benz is a high class car in its own right. Theres nothing poor about it (other than that damn tape deck in the hu:p )
Last edited by 230; Aug 15, 2002 at 10:45 PM.
This is to PSUN786: would it be fair to say that you have the poor mans C320, or dare I saw the Poor mans E Class, or How about the Poor Mans S Class. the coupers have the top of the light hatchback, you on the other hand have the cheapest 4 door sedan Mercedes makes. But you bye no means have a poor mans car.
As Tom Cruise was told in Top Gun, "Son your letting your ego write checks that your body can't cash" Think before you talk.
Every car company has a lower priced car than others. Who cares it comes standard with cloth. Lots of people perfer that over leather. The ML320 used to come standard with cloth also. I am not sure if it does anymore though. This car has the same feel as all the other Mercedes. Truthfully its more worth it than alot of them. My Family has have over 12 Mercedes in less than 7 years and the C - Coupe is just as Mercedes liks as all of them. Not to mention the reliability of my C coupe has been great. On my newer car (CLK430) i already have the Check Engine light on and its only 5 weeks old. I never had one Error light come on with my C coupe.
Oh and by the way when i was buying my C coupe the salesmen was going to give me the C240 auto with a cd changer and leather (unlike my C coupe) for the Identical price as my C coupe. Both were brand new but i still chose the C coupe (to u poor mans mercedes) over it instead.
If my first car was a Chrysler, I'd end up buying a Mercedes?!? Hehe...
If my first car was a NEON, I'd end up buying a Mercedes.
but it just didn't sound right... plus i didn't even know Dailmer-Chrysler owned MB until recently, cause its not entirely true. There are 2 companies, Dailmer-MB (don't quote me, I might be wrong), and Dailmer-Chrysler, so they are really 2 different divisions of a bigger company, not like the others where the luxury brand is a subdivision of the main brand.
I did miss:
If my first car was a Ford, I'd end up buying a Jaguar.
If my first car was a Mini, I'd end up buying a BMW.

