C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

'06 C230 V6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-22-2006, 10:45 AM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Jim Banville's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GA
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'06 Lexus GS300 RWD, '07 Camry SE V6 auto, '91 190E 2.6 auto
'06 C230 V6?

For those that own the '06 C230, what are your opinions about its V6 engine as compared to the old supercharged 4 banger? Any potential problems like the excessive carbon build up some 4 banger owners have suffered?
Old 07-22-2006, 10:55 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
C43AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,761
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
98 Black C43 , 08' ML320 CDI ,11 E63
Originally Posted by Jim Banville
For those that own the '06 C230, what are your opinions about its V6 engine as compared to the old supercharged 4 banger? Any potential problems like the excessive carbon build up some 4 banger owners have suffered?
I have a 00 - 230K - can you elaborate on the "excessive carbon build-up"?
Old 07-22-2006, 11:00 AM
  #3  
Super Moderator

 
nlpamg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: So Cal.
Posts: 8,692
Received 58 Likes on 16 Posts
2019 GT3 RS, 2017 M3 30 Jahre
Originally Posted by Jim Banville
For those that own the '06 C230, what are your opinions about its V6 engine as compared to the old supercharged 4 banger? Any potential problems like the excessive carbon build up some 4 banger owners have suffered?
back from the Lexus forums eh Jim? missing the C?

since, you're not a newb, I won't tell you to STFF but that perhaps C230_617 may still be lurking...

actually, I've posted a comparison as have others have of the 05 to 06, in short, I like the 4 better... but as for your question, I think it's too early on to know of any carbon buildup on the new v6's, I don't think there have been any reports yet.

welcome back.
Old 07-22-2006, 01:05 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Outland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The blue white rock, third out.
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Jim will feel right at home in the new V6 C230...its a little quicker than his old C240, and somewhat slower than his previous C230 SS.

4 banger all the way over the new V6 version. Faster, cheaper, better fuel economy.
Old 07-22-2006, 03:00 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BadAssC230k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF East Bay
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Double Stuff" SOLD | Nor*Cals "Pesky Audi"
Originally Posted by Outland
Jim will feel right at home in the new V6 C230...its a little quicker than his old C240, and somewhat slower than his previous C230 SS.

4 banger all the way over the new V6 version. Faster, cheaper, better fuel economy.

agreed. The new V6 has, and i say this very sparingly, a little more power than the 230k [i think its by 10hp or so]. So the fact that its a small V6 and that the old I4Komp can pretty much hang with it, its just kinda pointless you know?

I would think MB would soop up the I4komp and make it a bit more beefy, hp/torque-wise.
Old 07-22-2006, 06:56 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TA-9FF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: asdfasdf
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One with 4 wheels
IMHO, there's essentially no difference between the V6 and the I4K engine; if anything the V6 is a bit smoother, and lacks the whiny SC sound. You guys treat it like these engines are worlds apart from each other, when they're actually pretty close in comparison.

As for those claiming the I4K engine being faster...that's only during initial acceleration. The V6 is faster once it gets up to cruising speed (80mph+), and is able to gain more speed a bit faster compared to the I4K, which loses its steam after 90mph+. So it's basically a stalemate.
Old 07-22-2006, 07:48 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
anthuny85's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 c230 v6 SS
my 06 is a slug off the line..but after 3rd gear and 4k rpm its a different story, its a fwy car not street machine, and the v6 is smoother and sweeter sounding when it shifts between gears at 6k the throaty-ness and intake "sucking" and "whooosh" sounds are great...makes u wanna waste gas incredibly lol..
Old 07-22-2006, 11:47 PM
  #8  
Member
 
Gentlemanjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 C230 2.5 V6
V6 - Smoother, revs quickly, great mpg. A tad sluggish off the line, but I think that's a software issue by M-B design.
Old 07-22-2006, 11:58 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
drho2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: redondo beach, ca
Posts: 258
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 C230 SS
ive driven both, i have a '05 and wasa given a loaner '06 2 weeks ago. i gotta say the v6 is for sure quieter and smoother. but it just doesnt 'feel' faster than the 4.. off the line the v6 is quiete slugish as others have mentiioned. its def a fwy car. but what ive also noticed is that when u lane change or step on it while already cruising, the 4banger gives u a 'kick' that the v6 is missing. i think it has something to do with the 7speed auto though, because on paper the v6 is a nice little engine, perhaps the 6-speed manuals feel better? i dont know. all in all i think the '05 is just funner, and i love the s/c whine :-D
Old 07-23-2006, 06:57 AM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
iriefreek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Metro Orlando, Florida, USA
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'06 C230 Capri Blue
The V6 is smoother and quieter... a little more refined than the blown I4. Has a certain pleasing low purring sound when given gas.
Old 07-23-2006, 08:49 AM
  #11  
Member
 
Gentlemanjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 C230 2.5 V6
The V6 and the I4 are putting out about the same power so there should not be any real performance difference. Cars like most things are a result of perception. Loud exhausts seem faster, kompressor whine sounds faster, harsh shifting seems faster while quiet and smooth is perceived slow. If you want more boost two staging the blowers is not a practical solution.
Instead of fighting the lack of performance upgrades accept that M-B and especially the C230 is not embraced by a very large enthusiast community, so very few upgrades and the ones out their are expensive. It's the law of supply and demand and demand is low.
Take the $5, 6 or 10k and plank it down on a C350 268 HP, if it's a M-B you want or choose from a dozen other crs that have the beans you seek. Deep down you want a new ca anyway.
Old 07-23-2006, 08:52 AM
  #12  
Member
 
Gentlemanjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 C230 2.5 V6
One m ore thought. A couple cars ago I had a 2001 Audi S4 6 speed an awsome car ride, handling power where stellar and part of that equation besides the AWD and twin turbos was a 4.10: drive ratio, the M-b is 3.27:1. Maybe an rear end change can provide that kick we all seek.
Old 07-24-2006, 03:06 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
patrick_y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,090
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
2006 E55 and 2002 E320
Originally Posted by TA-9FF
IMHO, there's essentially no difference between the V6 and the I4K engine; if anything the V6 is a bit smoother, and lacks the whiny SC sound. You guys treat it like these engines are worlds apart from each other, when they're actually pretty close in comparison.

As for those claiming the I4K engine being faster...that's only during initial acceleration. The V6 is faster once it gets up to cruising speed (80mph+), and is able to gain more speed a bit faster compared to the I4K, which loses its steam after 90mph+. So it's basically a stalemate.
Actually, in my experience, the I4 seems to be much faster on the highway in the higher end acceleration (say around 50-70mph) than the V6. The V6 also requires much more downshifting as well with the automatic transmission.

I think both cars are great and personally I don't see a major difference in either of them.
Old 07-24-2006, 03:42 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TA-9FF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: asdfasdf
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One with 4 wheels
Originally Posted by Gentlemanjim
The V6 and the I4 are putting out about the same power so there should not be any real performance difference. Cars like most things are a result of perception. Loud exhausts seem faster, kompressor whine sounds faster, harsh shifting seems faster while quiet and smooth is perceived slow. If you want more boost two staging the blowers is not a practical solution.
Instead of fighting the lack of performance upgrades accept that M-B and especially the C230 is not embraced by a very large enthusiast community, so very few upgrades and the ones out their are expensive. It's the law of supply and demand and demand is low.
Take the $5, 6 or 10k and plank it down on a C350 268 HP, if it's a M-B you want or choose from a dozen other crs that have the beans you seek. Deep down you want a new ca anyway.
Though I agree, I think it's still somewhat retarded that we are not offered performance parts.

Oh well.
Old 07-24-2006, 05:28 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
k_lundquist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Avon, CT
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
07 G35 Sport 6MT, 2005 C230K SS (sold), 1998 Jeep GC 4x4 (da-heep!)
I love watchin the 05 guys vs. the 06 guys.
Old 07-24-2006, 05:47 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
drho2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: redondo beach, ca
Posts: 258
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 C230 SS
Originally Posted by Gentlemanjim
The V6 and the I4 are putting out about the same power so there should not be any real performance difference. Cars like most things are a result of perception. Loud exhausts seem faster, kompressor whine sounds faster, harsh shifting seems faster while quiet and smooth is perceived slow. If you want more boost two staging the blowers is not a practical solution.
Instead of fighting the lack of performance upgrades accept that M-B and especially the C230 is not embraced by a very large enthusiast community, so very few upgrades and the ones out their are expensive. It's the law of supply and demand and demand is low.
Take the $5, 6 or 10k and plank it down on a C350 268 HP, if it's a M-B you want or choose from a dozen other crs that have the beans you seek. Deep down you want a new ca anyway.
true. a louder car is PERCEIVED as faster. because most people associate race cars as being loud and fast. correct me if im wrong but the v6 puts out 10hp more than the I-4, but it puts down 10lbs of torque less. by this, it tells me the I-4 has more 'get up and go' power, but it should take the I-4 in the top end. from my understanding, torque gets you going, hp keeps u going. that being said i think thats why the I-4 'feels' faster off the line and in passing lane situations (40mph-60mph). oh man, if i had the loot, i would have def gone for the C350 SS
Old 07-24-2006, 11:34 PM
  #17  
Newbie
 
Kompressed_Benz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 C230 Sport Sedan; 2004 Pontiac GTO
Having traded an '03 C230 coupe w/ the 1.8 Kompressor for an '06 C230 Sport Sedan with the 2.5 V6, there are definite differences between the two engines.

- 1.8K definitely felt faster off the line and when you need to pass. The coupe would put me back in my seat...the V6 sedan does not.
- 1.8K got better gas mileage than the 2.5 V6.
- 1.8K had sweet blower whine on hard acceleration, but the 2.5 V6 exhaust note is definitely much better.
- 5 speed auto found the right gear a lot quicker and did not need to downshift near as much as the new 7 speed auto.

I love our new sedan - don't get me wrong. Looks-wise it hands the coupe it's **** and the exhaust note is very nice. I just miss the put-you-back-in-your-seat feel the coupe had and the V6 is a slug unless you give it hell, foot-to-the-floor style. Based on the sporty looks of the car, the 2.5 V6 definitely leaves a lot to be desired. My wife is probably tired of me griping about "shoulda bought a C350" every time I drive it!

Cheers!

Last edited by Kompressed_Benz; 07-24-2006 at 11:39 PM.
Old 07-25-2006, 12:03 PM
  #18  
Almost a Member!
 
bender73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you can never have enough horsepower!!! i had an e46 M3 and craved more power. i realized at that point that no matter what i buy, i'll want more. so, i am happy with 201HP and a nice looking comfy sedan. more power than you need 99% of the time.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: '06 C230 V6?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 PM.