Saw new Accord the other day...
Newbie
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
I know what you mean. My mom actually just got one about 2 months ago, and surprisingly, it's incredibly nice. I'm not a huge fan of the exterior stlying, but this much is true...
-The interior design is awesome, especially with the sand leather and burlwood trim.
-The car is extremely rigid.
-Fit and finish are second to none. If you ever have a chance, take a look at the way the hood and other body pannels fit...the gaps are incredibly small and everything looks nice and tight.
Hopefully I can post some pics soon!
-The interior design is awesome, especially with the sand leather and burlwood trim.
-The car is extremely rigid.
-Fit and finish are second to none. If you ever have a chance, take a look at the way the hood and other body pannels fit...the gaps are incredibly small and everything looks nice and tight.
Hopefully I can post some pics soon!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
From: Gaithersburg, MD
2002 C240 6-spd (ret)
I've never really been an Accord fan due mostly to the exterior design (ie., extremely boring). I've seen several new ones, and IMO, the back is very nice, modern and clean, definitely a welcome departure from "normal" Accord design. The roofline, especially near the C-pillar has a classy, elegant look. I think they really missed a much higher potential with the front-end design -- very cheap looking -- not fitting with the rest of the re-design. The front is the main reason I would again not consider the Accord. First, they need a bit of chrome, at least surrounding the "grille" opening. Then, they need a little more mass there instead of making it look like a "cheap" Civic or other low-level Japanese car. The overall Camry design still beats the new Accord, IMO.
Last edited by MarkL; Nov 27, 2002 at 03:27 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Encino
2002 C230 Kompressor coupe, white
I saw one while pumping gas the other day, the mechanic from the dealership down my street was also pumping gas. The car isnt that bad looking, just a bit weird:p
I think i would choose the new accord over the new camry
I think i would choose the new accord over the new camry
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Croton, NY
1991 mr2 turbo, 2002 coupe
Not a big fan of the 4dr, the coupe looks pretty sweet- not much unlike the new CLK. I'm certainly not saying I'd rather an Accord over a CLK but for even money I think I'd take the 2 Accords.
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Originally posted by zimmer26
Not a big fan of the 4dr, the coupe looks pretty sweet- not much unlike the new CLK. I'm certainly not saying I'd rather an Accord over a CLK but for even money I think I'd take the 2 Accords.
Not a big fan of the 4dr, the coupe looks pretty sweet- not much unlike the new CLK. I'm certainly not saying I'd rather an Accord over a CLK but for even money I think I'd take the 2 Accords.
The Accord Coupe is a nice looking car. Doesn't it have something like 240 hp, 6 speed, leather, etc. for around $25,000? If so, certainly not a car deserving of much criticism.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 1
From: GA
'06 Lexus GS300 RWD, '07 Camry SE V6 auto, '91 190E 2.6 auto
Doesn't it have something like 240 hp, 6 speed, leather, etc. for around $25,000? If so, certainly not a car deserving of much criticism.
Last edited by Jim Banville; Nov 27, 2002 at 04:29 PM.
Trending Topics
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Originally posted by Jim Banville
You can't judge a car by its spec's. Based on spec's, a Hyundai would be comparable to a MB (just as many features for less money)! The Accord is REAR WHEEL DRIVE (HATE THAT!) and I doubt its leather is the same quality as MB. And I'd MUCH rather be in the MB in a wreck.
You can't judge a car by its spec's. Based on spec's, a Hyundai would be comparable to a MB (just as many features for less money)! The Accord is REAR WHEEL DRIVE (HATE THAT!) and I doubt its leather is the same quality as MB. And I'd MUCH rather be in the MB in a wreck.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
2002 C230 K
Originally posted by Jim Banville
You can't judge a car by its spec's. Based on spec's, a Hyundai would be comparable to a MB (just as many features for less money)! The Accord is FRONT WHEEL DRIVE (HATE THAT!) and I doubt its leather is the same quality as MB. And I'd MUCH rather be in the MB in a wreck.
You can't judge a car by its spec's. Based on spec's, a Hyundai would be comparable to a MB (just as many features for less money)! The Accord is FRONT WHEEL DRIVE (HATE THAT!) and I doubt its leather is the same quality as MB. And I'd MUCH rather be in the MB in a wreck.
Regarding FWD - I too prefer RWD, but in reality most people will never notice the difference.
The Hyundai's were actually surprisingly nice as well.
Cheers, BT
Super Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
From: NJ
'05 c240 4matic wagon
Originally posted by MacPhisto
I agree - I don't think the 4 door is ugly by any means, but not great looking, either. Its just there.
The Accord Coupe is a nice looking car. Doesn't it have something like 240 hp, 6 speed, leather, etc. for around $25,000? If so, certainly not a car deserving of much criticism.
I agree - I don't think the 4 door is ugly by any means, but not great looking, either. Its just there.
The Accord Coupe is a nice looking car. Doesn't it have something like 240 hp, 6 speed, leather, etc. for around $25,000? If so, certainly not a car deserving of much criticism.
Tommy who? Hilfiger? Or the one with the Smurf leather interior?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
From: Gaithersburg, MD
2002 C240 6-spd (ret)
Originally posted by columbus
++++ Tommy is My Role Model ++++
Tommy who? Hilfiger? Or the one with the Smurf leather interior?
++++ Tommy is My Role Model ++++
Tommy who? Hilfiger? Or the one with the Smurf leather interior?
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 1
From: GA
'06 Lexus GS300 RWD, '07 Camry SE V6 auto, '91 190E 2.6 auto
Why do you hate FWD so much?
Last edited by Jim Banville; Nov 27, 2002 at 11:46 PM.
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 20,081
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Volvo V90 CC
Re: Saw new Accord the other day...
Originally posted by Jim Banville
...and I thought it was a Civic. YUCK!
...and I thought it was a Civic. YUCK!
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 1
From: GA
'06 Lexus GS300 RWD, '07 Camry SE V6 auto, '91 190E 2.6 auto
but the coupe is very different from the 4 door sedan
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 1
From: GA
'06 Lexus GS300 RWD, '07 Camry SE V6 auto, '91 190E 2.6 auto
Doesn't it have something like 240 hp, 6 speed, leather, etc. for around $25,000? If so, certainly not a car deserving of much criticism.
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
The price difference between equivalently equipped G35s and Accords (leather, etc.) is over $6,000. That makes the G35 almost 25% more expensive - really a different price class.
Its hard to believe that anyone would really find the Accord coupe to be ugly or unattractive, but I guess tastes vary. I find chrome 19 inch wheels and cut coil springs on a C class unattractive, but lots apparently like that.
Its hard to believe that anyone would really find the Accord coupe to be ugly or unattractive, but I guess tastes vary. I find chrome 19 inch wheels and cut coil springs on a C class unattractive, but lots apparently like that.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
From: Houston,TX-moving to The Woodlands,TX SOON!!!
Toyota Tacoma & Lexus IS250
Re: Saw new Accord the other day...
Originally posted by Jim Banville
...and I thought it was a Civic. YUCK!
...and I thought it was a Civic. YUCK!
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 1
From: GA
'06 Lexus GS300 RWD, '07 Camry SE V6 auto, '91 190E 2.6 auto
For $29K, the "base" G35 sportcoupe has REAR WHEEL DRIVE, 40 more HP, leather wrapped steering wheel, 17" wheels, and a few more goodies. A similarly equipped Accord Coupe V6 (non-leather) would result in a final price of $25K, and you can forget getting REAR WHEEL DRIVE and those other 40 ponies 
If you were about to spend $25K on an Accord coupe V6, I think you'd be very foolish to eliminate the base G35 for just $4K more.
If you were about to spend $25K on an Accord coupe V6, I think you'd be very foolish to eliminate the base G35 for just $4K more.
Newbie
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: AZ
'03 MINI Cooper S
RWD vs FWD
I have a new 02 coupe (Orion blue C2 C7 Bose Auto) and an 03 MINI Cooper S (Indi blue/white top ESP xeons). The MINI has 17's and Getrag 6 speed. A rocket ship on rails.
They are two VERY different cars. Anything under 90, the MINI is my choice. It has no noticable torque steer, excellent turn in. and tight suspension. I plan on adding LSD and lighter wheels without runflats.
The MB is calmer, quieter, softer, and roomier. If it were my only car it would have to be a 6 speed with a suspension kit. I have an audio 10 coming.
Fit and finish on both cars are comparable. The MINI has some british quirkiness, and it attracts far more attention. Both have had trim pieces come loose. The MB outweighs the MINI by at least 750 lbs! Nearly every part is heavier than necessary, but that's what gives it a solid feel. I love them both, but for different reasons.
Ann Jones
They are two VERY different cars. Anything under 90, the MINI is my choice. It has no noticable torque steer, excellent turn in. and tight suspension. I plan on adding LSD and lighter wheels without runflats.
The MB is calmer, quieter, softer, and roomier. If it were my only car it would have to be a 6 speed with a suspension kit. I have an audio 10 coming.
Fit and finish on both cars are comparable. The MINI has some british quirkiness, and it attracts far more attention. Both have had trim pieces come loose. The MB outweighs the MINI by at least 750 lbs! Nearly every part is heavier than necessary, but that's what gives it a solid feel. I love them both, but for different reasons.
Ann Jones
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Originally posted by Jim Banville
For $29K, the "base" G35 sportcoupe has REAR WHEEL DRIVE, 40 more HP, leather wrapped steering wheel, 17" wheels, and a few more goodies. A similarly equipped Accord Coupe V6 (non-leather) would result in a final price of $25K, and you can forget getting REAR WHEEL DRIVE and those other 40 ponies If you were about to spend $25K on an Accord coupe V6, I think you'd be very foolish to eliminate the base G35 for just $4K more.
For $29K, the "base" G35 sportcoupe has REAR WHEEL DRIVE, 40 more HP, leather wrapped steering wheel, 17" wheels, and a few more goodies. A similarly equipped Accord Coupe V6 (non-leather) would result in a final price of $25K, and you can forget getting REAR WHEEL DRIVE and those other 40 ponies
If you were about to spend $25K on an Accord coupe V6, I think you'd be very foolish to eliminate the base G35 for just $4K more.
I guess you'd be really foolish to pay MORE than G35 money for a C230, with 91 (NINETY-ONE!) ponies LESS, only 16 inch wheels, etc???
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 20,081
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Volvo V90 CC
Originally posted by MacPhisto
You make a good case for the G35 SportsCoupe!
I guess you'd be really foolish to pay MORE than G35 money for a C230, with 91 (NINETY-ONE!) ponies LESS, only 16 inch wheels, etc???
You make a good case for the G35 SportsCoupe!
I guess you'd be really foolish to pay MORE than G35 money for a C230, with 91 (NINETY-ONE!) ponies LESS, only 16 inch wheels, etc???
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 1
From: GA
'06 Lexus GS300 RWD, '07 Camry SE V6 auto, '91 190E 2.6 auto
I guess you'd be really foolish to pay MORE than G35 money for a C230, with 91 (NINETY-ONE!) ponies LESS, only 16 inch wheels, etc???
