Pros and Cons Of Low-Profile Tires
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 44
From: Los Angeles, CA
2015 C400 Tenorite Gray
Pros and Cons Of Low-Profile Tires
I came across the following article as I want to upgrade to bigger tires.
There has been a recent upsurge of extremely low-profile tires and extraordinarily large-diameter wheels on all types of personal vehicles. Is this good: stiffer sidewalls less lateral movement? Or is this bad: more unsprung mass * changing suspension requirements? Or is this just an expensive affectation? -- Frank
RAY: It's primarily about style, Frank. People want bigger wheels because they look cooler.
TOM: And if you use a bigger wheel, you have to use a lower-profile (i.e., shorter sidewall) tire so the wheel/tire combination still fits in the car's wheel well.
RAY: The weight isn't much of an issue, because alloy wheels are pretty light. And when you go with a bigger wheel/smaller tire combination, it's pretty much a wash.
TOM: You do get some handling benefits with lower-profile tires. The less-expansive sidewall you have, the less the sidewall will flex on turns. That's good for handling.
RAY: But you pay a high price in ride quality. Because you have less sidewall, there's less of it to absorb bumps and potholes. So lower-profile tires give you a much harsher ride.
TOM: The other significant argument against low-profile tires is that with less sidewall, the wheels themselves are much more vulnerable to being bent from potholes and scraping up against curbs. Especially if you live in a city. And when you have to replace a 19-inch alloy rim and it costs you $750, you're going to wish you'd gotten the smaller wheels with bigger tires, even if you don't look quite as cool when you go to pick up your dry cleaning.
© 2007 by Tom and Ray Magliozzi and Doug Berman Distributed by King Features Syndicate, Inc.
I am leaning towards 18" up from 16". The suspension is stock although I'll likely go to a sport suspension. I'd like to hear from others who upgraded to a larger tire from stock.
There has been a recent upsurge of extremely low-profile tires and extraordinarily large-diameter wheels on all types of personal vehicles. Is this good: stiffer sidewalls less lateral movement? Or is this bad: more unsprung mass * changing suspension requirements? Or is this just an expensive affectation? -- Frank
RAY: It's primarily about style, Frank. People want bigger wheels because they look cooler.
TOM: And if you use a bigger wheel, you have to use a lower-profile (i.e., shorter sidewall) tire so the wheel/tire combination still fits in the car's wheel well.
RAY: The weight isn't much of an issue, because alloy wheels are pretty light. And when you go with a bigger wheel/smaller tire combination, it's pretty much a wash.
TOM: You do get some handling benefits with lower-profile tires. The less-expansive sidewall you have, the less the sidewall will flex on turns. That's good for handling.
RAY: But you pay a high price in ride quality. Because you have less sidewall, there's less of it to absorb bumps and potholes. So lower-profile tires give you a much harsher ride.
TOM: The other significant argument against low-profile tires is that with less sidewall, the wheels themselves are much more vulnerable to being bent from potholes and scraping up against curbs. Especially if you live in a city. And when you have to replace a 19-inch alloy rim and it costs you $750, you're going to wish you'd gotten the smaller wheels with bigger tires, even if you don't look quite as cool when you go to pick up your dry cleaning.
© 2007 by Tom and Ray Magliozzi and Doug Berman Distributed by King Features Syndicate, Inc.
I am leaning towards 18" up from 16". The suspension is stock although I'll likely go to a sport suspension. I'd like to hear from others who upgraded to a larger tire from stock.
Last edited by Nicholi2007; Mar 28, 2009 at 10:31 PM. Reason: grammar
Super Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 671
Likes: 18
From: Tucson, Az
10 GLK350/ 15 Accord/ 94 Supra Turbo
the sport suspension is really nice, even with 234/25/19 and oem suspention it still rides smooth, but nothing bad IMO, compare to my brothers 09 Honda CRV my benz with 19s is still smoother.
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Likes: 2
From: California
03 W203, 13 E350, 13 W204, 14 C218
when i went from my stock wheels to my 19's i changed the sport suspension out for KWv2's so I am not quite sure how the would have ridden on my sport suspension but they ride smooth on my KW's.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 6
From: Corona, CA
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
i went from 17's to 19's..with a 235/35/19 all around. The tires i bought have a slight lip around to to protect the rim from potholes. I drove over a couple of pot holes since i got them and no rim benting. As for ride quality, i didn't really notice a difference unless you drive on really bad roads. but you won't feel too big of a difference on any decently paved even highway.
Trending Topics
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 6
From: Corona, CA
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
you can fill a little bit more of the gap by using tires with a larger sidewall. Given how high our mercedes are stock, you won't really see much of a differnce until you lower the car.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
'05 C230
Im actually satisfied with the stock height for the rear but the front has this nasty gap and that's probably what I will do. Do you know how large of a sidewall i can go for the stocks without the front rubbing?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 6
From: Corona, CA
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
whats your current tire size? you should really look at the wheels thread. they mention rim and tire sizes with pics. If you stay with a 225, you probably won't rub. I only rub on U turns with my 235's.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 6
From: Corona, CA
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
tire width won't effect your gap...it'll just change your contact patch size. Also keep in mind, you 235's for different brand tires are slightly different. I rub on 235's but then there some people that dont rub on 235's.
You should check out the wheel thread.
You should check out the wheel thread.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
'05 C230
oh shoot, what a bonehead. 225 is the tire width..not the height. I Didn't even noticed that when i first posted my question.
What Im trying to do is get a higher tire to fill the gaps. same width but higher tire size than the stock. Ill just check the aftermarket wheel thread. Thanks man!
What Im trying to do is get a higher tire to fill the gaps. same width but higher tire size than the stock. Ill just check the aftermarket wheel thread. Thanks man!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 8
2006 C350 Sport 6MT
I came across the following article as I want to upgrade to bigger tires.
There has been a recent upsurge of extremely low-profile tires and extraordinarily large-diameter wheels on all types of personal vehicles. Is this good: stiffer sidewalls less lateral movement? Or is this bad: more unsprung mass * changing suspension requirements? Or is this just an expensive affectation? -- Frank
RAY: It's primarily about style, Frank. People want bigger wheels because they look cooler.
TOM: And if you use a bigger wheel, you have to use a lower-profile (i.e., shorter sidewall) tire so the wheel/tire combination still fits in the car's wheel well.
RAY: The weight isn't much of an issue, because alloy wheels are pretty light. And when you go with a bigger wheel/smaller tire combination, it's pretty much a wash.
TOM: You do get some handling benefits with lower-profile tires. The less-expansive sidewall you have, the less the sidewall will flex on turns. That's good for handling.
RAY: But you pay a high price in ride quality. Because you have less sidewall, there's less of it to absorb bumps and potholes. So lower-profile tires give you a much harsher ride.
TOM: The other significant argument against low-profile tires is that with less sidewall, the wheels themselves are much more vulnerable to being bent from potholes and scraping up against curbs. Especially if you live in a city. And when you have to replace a 19-inch alloy rim and it costs you $750, you're going to wish you'd gotten the smaller wheels with bigger tires, even if you don't look quite as cool when you go to pick up your dry cleaning.
© 2007 by Tom and Ray Magliozzi and Doug Berman Distributed by King Features Syndicate, Inc.
I am leaning towards 18" up from 16". The suspension is stock although I'll likely go to a sport suspension. I'd like to hear from others who upgraded to a larger tire from stock.
There has been a recent upsurge of extremely low-profile tires and extraordinarily large-diameter wheels on all types of personal vehicles. Is this good: stiffer sidewalls less lateral movement? Or is this bad: more unsprung mass * changing suspension requirements? Or is this just an expensive affectation? -- Frank
RAY: It's primarily about style, Frank. People want bigger wheels because they look cooler.
TOM: And if you use a bigger wheel, you have to use a lower-profile (i.e., shorter sidewall) tire so the wheel/tire combination still fits in the car's wheel well.
RAY: The weight isn't much of an issue, because alloy wheels are pretty light. And when you go with a bigger wheel/smaller tire combination, it's pretty much a wash.
TOM: You do get some handling benefits with lower-profile tires. The less-expansive sidewall you have, the less the sidewall will flex on turns. That's good for handling.
RAY: But you pay a high price in ride quality. Because you have less sidewall, there's less of it to absorb bumps and potholes. So lower-profile tires give you a much harsher ride.
TOM: The other significant argument against low-profile tires is that with less sidewall, the wheels themselves are much more vulnerable to being bent from potholes and scraping up against curbs. Especially if you live in a city. And when you have to replace a 19-inch alloy rim and it costs you $750, you're going to wish you'd gotten the smaller wheels with bigger tires, even if you don't look quite as cool when you go to pick up your dry cleaning.
© 2007 by Tom and Ray Magliozzi and Doug Berman Distributed by King Features Syndicate, Inc.
I am leaning towards 18" up from 16". The suspension is stock although I'll likely go to a sport suspension. I'd like to hear from others who upgraded to a larger tire from stock.
Don't be fooled by these articles buddy. Keep it the way it is, don't go spending extra money for new tires. You just have to be extra careful not to scratch the rims and not to hit huge potholes so you dont bend them.
Also as mentioned above you get better performance
Also this is IMO = 18" you don't need to worry about anything. (although from 16 to 18 you will feel a difference but still a nice smooth ride just stiff)
Last edited by W203E35; Mar 30, 2009 at 03:00 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 8
2006 C350 Sport 6MT
Agree to that my mom has a 07 Honda Accord and I feel every little bump, with my stock suspension the ride is stiff but at the same time pretty smooth. I don't feel every crack on the road like I do with the Accord.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 268
Likes: 1
From: VA
2002 C320
Don't be fooled by these articles buddy. Keep it the way it is, don't go spending extra money for new tires. You just have to be extra careful not to scratch the rims and not to hit huge potholes so you dont bend them.
Also as mentioned above you get better performance
Also this is IMO = 18" you don't need to worry about anything. (although from 16 to 18 you will feel a difference but still a nice smooth ride just stiff)
Also as mentioned above you get better performance
Also this is IMO = 18" you don't need to worry about anything. (although from 16 to 18 you will feel a difference but still a nice smooth ride just stiff)
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 526
Likes: 1
From: MD
2007 C230 and 1985 Monte SS
As for the low profile tires handling better, it's really only true for a decently smooth surface. If you get any kinds of bumps, you'll want compliance just like you would in a suspension setup. It also becomes harder to feel the edge of the tire's performance capability. You may be able to pull a little bit more lateral acceleration, but there will be less warning before you lose traction on the tire.
The big practical reason for running bigger wheels is bigger brakes.
And the little lips around the bead of some tires is there to protect you from curb rash, although I would not rely on it by any means. They wont do squat for pothole protection. Potholes can bend rims without ever directly touching the wheel iteself.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 44
From: Los Angeles, CA
2015 C400 Tenorite Gray
Don't be fooled by these articles buddy. Keep it the way it is, don't go spending extra money for new tires. You just have to be extra careful not to scratch the rims and not to hit huge potholes so you dont bend them.
Also as mentioned above you get better performance
Also this is IMO = 18" you don't need to worry about anything. (although from 16 to 18 you will feel a difference but still a nice smooth ride just stiff)
Also as mentioned above you get better performance
Also this is IMO = 18" you don't need to worry about anything. (although from 16 to 18 you will feel a difference but still a nice smooth ride just stiff)
The roads in L.A. are a disgrace. Massachusetts went through a similar period because of too many tax cuts and bureaucratic inefficiency (they are now excellent). I am going to go +1 from stock.
Last edited by Nicholi2007; Mar 30, 2009 at 02:54 PM. Reason: grammar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
I'm very critical of ride quality & it's no accident that Benz stopped at 17" with Sport Pack on these cars - It's the largest size that does a reasonable job of maintaining Merc ride comfort. It's also effected by tyre choice. Michelin will give you the most comfortable ride with low profile tyres because they have the most pliant sidewalls in the tyre industry.
I would never go lower than 40 profile under any circumstances. The V6s are a little more tolerant of lower profiles because of the extra weight.
I'm going 17 X 8.5 ET30 rear with 245/40 & 17 X 8 ET30 front with 235/45 from my standard 16" 225/50 - stock set up & suspension. SA stock is lower than US cars especially in the front.
This is all very personal but no one must tell me that 19" wheels with 30 or 35 profile tyres don't screw up the ride quality. They do - period - It depends what you are prepared to tolerate.
I would never go lower than 40 profile under any circumstances. The V6s are a little more tolerant of lower profiles because of the extra weight.
I'm going 17 X 8.5 ET30 rear with 245/40 & 17 X 8 ET30 front with 235/45 from my standard 16" 225/50 - stock set up & suspension. SA stock is lower than US cars especially in the front.
This is all very personal but no one must tell me that 19" wheels with 30 or 35 profile tyres don't screw up the ride quality. They do - period - It depends what you are prepared to tolerate.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 7
From: Va Beach, VA
05 C230K SS (sold), 06 C55 (sold), 08 Yamaha R1 (sold), 16 X5M
im running 19x8 235/40 and 19x9.5 255/35 and no problems whatsoever...ive had them since november! hit many a pothole on accidnt and no problem, i also keep my tires nitrogen filled which will help slightly in rebounding from quick bumps by being more incompressible than air...just a thought
Super Moderator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Nitrogen is a waste of time on road cars & frequently stops the tyres from running hot enough. Good for track as it keeps pressure more constant & you are running soft compounds that can overheat & blister.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 8
2006 C350 Sport 6MT
I don't know about what kind of rims you had but I think if you get good rims (maybe forged) you will be good. What kind of rims did you have?
I mean the w204 sport (My rental (free of charge
) since my w203 is in the shop) has AMG 18" stock. That's a W204 C300 coming with 18" stock rims. I think if MB is putting those rims out factory then you don't have anything to worry about especially 18".I think 18" are whatever but if you said 19" I would say maybe.
Not trying to be rude but what kind of rims did you have that bent 3 times in one year??
Super Moderator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Just remember the W204 has different spring & damper rates to the W203 and mechano-active dampers or fully active dampers depending on how it's speced.
