C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

Mini w204 review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-16-2010, 08:45 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
zerocover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2007 C280 4Matic
Mini w204 review

I left my car at the dealer yesterday and they gave me a new C300 4matic sport to drive. I have to say the interior is total garbage. This should be a Mercedes not a Toyota with a Mercedes badge on it.

Aside from being completely mortified over the styling and lack of features on this model there were some nice things. For one the car was a new car so the brakes were grabby, and the interior was way better sealed up them my car.

The nicest thing about this car is the suspension, I would do anything to make my car handle just like this thing. Can I use any 204 suspension parts? I put all cars through this one jug handle near where I live to see what they can do. Every car I put on it has screeched the tires around 40, my W203 can get totally sideways on it. The w204 took it at full throttle, held my line, and had no perceivable body roll. I need what this car has.

All in all the W204 is way too vanilla, it’s good but nothing special. I cant explain it but nothing got me particularly excited about it.
Old 06-16-2010, 10:49 AM
  #2  
Super Moderator
 
johnand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 24 Posts
2007 C230SS; 2014 ML350 BT
One question: What tires are on your car and what was on the loaner. I agree, the W204 is better handling than the W203, but not night and day difference. Tires are the absolutely most important part on the car for handling=, braking, etc, and are so often overlooked.
Old 06-16-2010, 12:14 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bdgdl08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1999 CLK320 (sold), 2007 C230 SS (gone), 2000 Grand Marquis, 2011 CR-Z, stay tuned...
The brakes on the new ones are different, somehow... They feel to me more like the brakes in a Honda - alot more sensitive, but no more powerful.
Old 06-16-2010, 02:03 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
zerocover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2007 C280 4Matic
Originally Posted by johnand
One question: What tires are on your car and what was on the loaner. I agree, the W204 is better handling than the W203, but not night and day difference. Tires are the absolutely most important part on the car for handling=, braking, etc, and are so often overlooked.
My tires are close to kicked, I have a new set on order. Its not just the rubber, the w204 has almost no body roll its like a BMW. I'm hopping the major difference is coming from the loaner being a Sport model while mine is luxury. It has stiffer (harsher) springs and struts. I'm sure of that.

Originally Posted by bdgdl08
The brakes on the new ones are different, somehow.
Prob only a different pad material.
Old 06-16-2010, 03:11 PM
  #5  
Out Of Control!!
 
tommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Westwood, NJ
Posts: 10,067
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
2004 Civic Si. FWD for the Win!
Originally Posted by zerocover
I'm hopping the major difference is coming from the loaner being a Sport model while mine is luxury. It has stiffer (harsher) springs and struts. I'm sure of that.
Why not just get aftermarket upgrades for your suspension, and have a suspension that's even better than the 204? You're talking like you have no options.

I do agree with you on the interior of the 204 - yawn.
Old 06-16-2010, 03:26 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
DrgnflyZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: So Fla
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 W203 SS
Originally Posted by zerocover
I left my car at the dealer yesterday and they gave me a new C300 4matic sport to drive. I have to say the interior is total garbage. This should be a Mercedes not a Toyota with a Mercedes badge on it.

Aside from being completely mortified over the styling and lack of features on this model there were some nice things. For one the car was a new car so the brakes were grabby, and the interior was way better sealed up them my car.

The nicest thing about this car is the suspension, I would do anything to make my car handle just like this thing. Can I use any 204 suspension parts? I put all cars through this one jug handle near where I live to see what they can do. Every car I put on it has screeched the tires around 40, my W203 can get totally sideways on it. The w204 took it at full throttle, held my line, and had no perceivable body roll. I need what this car has.

All in all the W204 is way too vanilla, it’s good but nothing special. I cant explain it but nothing got me particularly excited about it.
I too had a loaner over the weekend. Too much hard plastic in the interior and whoa, what a lack of features! Build one for yourself on the MB site and see it tally up. I'm very pleased with the ammenities in my W203. The suspension is nice but I found it a bit bouncy in comparison. Flat cornering is a plus but the feedback on the 203 seems more alive.

Originally Posted by johnand
One question: What tires are on your car and what was on the loaner. I agree, the W204 is better handling than the W203, but not night and day difference. Tires are the absolutely most important part on the car for handling=, braking, etc, and are so often overlooked.
So true... my loaner had the same staggered setup and yet the 5000 mile new Continental tires howled and protested around the same corner my 11,000 mile Pirelli Rossos takes so easily.

Originally Posted by bdgdl08
The brakes on the new ones are different, somehow... They feel to me more like the brakes in a Honda - alot more sensitive, but no more powerful.
More initial sensitivity yet requires the same pressure to slow/stop. I agree.
Old 06-16-2010, 03:29 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
LILBENZ230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,384
Received 795 Likes on 598 Posts
2019 G70 6MT & 2022 Ford Maverick XL
Originally Posted by zerocover
the w204 has almost no body roll its like a BMW.
Ohhh but trust me, no it isn't!
Old 06-16-2010, 03:46 PM
  #8  
Super Moderator
 
johnand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 24 Posts
2007 C230SS; 2014 ML350 BT
Originally Posted by zerocover
My tires are close to kicked, I have a new set on order. Its not just the rubber, the w204 has almost no body roll its like a BMW. I'm hopping the major difference is coming from the loaner being a Sport model while mine is luxury. It has stiffer (harsher) springs and struts. I'm sure of that.
Ohh, that is absolutely the difference you are seeing. The handling difference between a luxury and sport is pretty significant. The difference between a W203 Sport and W204 is not near as significant, in fact very subtle.
Old 06-16-2010, 03:47 PM
  #9  
Super Moderator
 
johnand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 24 Posts
2007 C230SS; 2014 ML350 BT
Originally Posted by LILBENZ230
Ohhh but trust me, no it isn't!
Old 06-16-2010, 03:49 PM
  #10  
Super Moderator
 
johnand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 24 Posts
2007 C230SS; 2014 ML350 BT
Originally Posted by tommy
Why not just get aftermarket upgrades for your suspension, and have a suspension that's even better than the 204? You're talking like you have no options.

I do agree with you on the interior of the 204 - yawn.
Absolutely. With a few choice suspension upgrades, you can transform your sedate luxury model to better handling machine than the W204, but it will NEVER handle like a BMW
Old 06-16-2010, 04:13 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
LILBENZ230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,384
Received 795 Likes on 598 Posts
2019 G70 6MT & 2022 Ford Maverick XL
The luxury versions of the W203 have never appealed to me. I'd get a Lexus first. The one thing about the Sport W203 and Sport W204 is that the 204 has better chassis rigidity and is going to feel better, even if it can't produce significantly better numbers.
Old 06-16-2010, 04:19 PM
  #12  
Out Of Control!!
 
tommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Westwood, NJ
Posts: 10,067
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
2004 Civic Si. FWD for the Win!
Originally Posted by johnand
Absolutely. With a few choice suspension upgrades, you can transform your sedate luxury model to better handling machine than the W204, but it will NEVER handle like a BMW
That's true - I don't get people who drive the 3 series vs. the C series, and can't figure out which they like better. The differences are pretty obvious.

Now, if the 1 series were around in 2001 (especially the 5-door ), I wouldn't be here. With all of the $$ I've put into mods, my coupey is ok, but throw them into a 135, and it would be a beast.
Old 06-16-2010, 04:20 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
zerocover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2007 C280 4Matic
Originally Posted by tommy
Why not just get aftermarket upgrades for your suspension, and have a suspension that's even better than the 204? You're talking like you have no options.

I do agree with you on the interior of the 204 - yawn.
I have a 4matic, I have no options.
You'll notice whenever you look up cool suspension parts they will say exc. 4matic.

Originally Posted by johnand
Absolutely. With a few choice suspension upgrades, you can transform your sedate luxury model to better handling machine than the W204, but it will NEVER handle like a BMW
Nah I recently test drove a 328xi (a comparable BMW to a C300 4matic), while it was scary good it wasn't too far from the w204. Otherwise the 3 series easily puts everything else in its class to shame suspension wise, too bad the interiors are just as blah as the w204.

This is important: Does anyone have spring rate numbers on the C300 sport? How about the luxury C280 4matic?
Old 06-16-2010, 04:32 PM
  #14  
Super Member
 
AdidasC230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saab 900 SE
Originally Posted by johnand
Ohh, that is absolutely the difference you are seeing. The handling difference between a luxury and sport is pretty significant. The difference between a W203 Sport and W204 is not near as significant, in fact very subtle.
I don't quite agree with you on sport to sport W204 to W203 being subtle. Maybe its the age of my suspension at 50k but the W204 feels much stiffer, and the rear doesn't seem to squat or dip like the W203 does, I consider that a big difference, I don't think ours roll bad, but it def seems to ride smoother (softer) then the C300 sports Ive been in.

Id agree the new C rides more BMWish but Im comparing that to a E46 330CI which is the only BMW I have had decent seat time in to judge it by, the BMW was still much stiffer though
Old 06-16-2010, 04:47 PM
  #15  
Out Of Control!!
 
tommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Westwood, NJ
Posts: 10,067
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
2004 Civic Si. FWD for the Win!
Originally Posted by zerocover
I have a 4matic, I have no options.
You'll notice whenever you look up cool suspension parts they will say exc. 4matic.
Sorry - missed that. You're screwed, then.
Old 06-16-2010, 04:49 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
LILBENZ230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,384
Received 795 Likes on 598 Posts
2019 G70 6MT & 2022 Ford Maverick XL
With BMWs it is not just about being stiff. It's about the way they handle, the perfect balance.
Old 06-16-2010, 04:51 PM
  #17  
MBworld Guru
 
FrankW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
white and whiter
you are comparing your luxury sedan suspension to 204's "sport" suspension?

you can't be serious. where's my faceplam smilie...
Old 06-16-2010, 04:58 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
zerocover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2007 C280 4Matic
Originally Posted by FrankW
you are comparing your luxury sedan suspension to 204's "sport" suspension?

you can't be serious. where's my faceplam smilie...
The W203 did not have a 4matic sport. There is no comparison, I want it.
Old 06-16-2010, 05:04 PM
  #19  
Super Member
 
AdidasC230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saab 900 SE
Originally Posted by LILBENZ230
With BMWs it is not just about being stiff. It's about the way they handle, the perfect balance.
I am sure it is, and I dont know whats actually considered good feedback, but I find E46 BMW coupes to have very heavy (not responsive) heavy steering feel. My C seems to communicate as much as the E46's ive driven without getting such resistance just driving it, I feel like BMW would suffer more from bump steer then a C, but Im would venture the feel is much better in the 1 and new 3 since they are newer designs. Of course its all personal choice, some people like my rents love super power assisted steering like F150s have
Old 06-16-2010, 05:12 PM
  #20  
MBworld Guru
 
FrankW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally Posted by zerocover
The W203 did not have a 4matic sport. There is no comparison, I want it.
you can get Vogtland springs, and sway bars.
Old 06-17-2010, 10:36 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
zerocover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2007 C280 4Matic
Originally Posted by FrankW
you can get Vogtland springs, and sway bars.
Springs wont help, the cars over sprung already. A good set of struts could transform this car (too bad no struts are made). Also to install a front sway bar I would need to pull the engine, at least thats whats in WIS.

Coilovers do exist but they're Ksport (not putting that garbage on my car) If only koni made an insert that fit.
Old 06-17-2010, 10:51 AM
  #22  
Super Moderator
 
johnand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 24 Posts
2007 C230SS; 2014 ML350 BT
Originally Posted by AdidasC230
I don't quite agree with you on sport to sport W204 to W203 being subtle. Maybe its the age of my suspension at 50k but the W204 feels much stiffer, and the rear doesn't seem to squat or dip like the W203 does, I consider that a big difference, I don't think ours roll bad, but it def seems to ride smoother (softer) then the C300 sports Ive been in.

Id agree the new C rides more BMWish but Im comparing that to a E46 330CI which is the only BMW I have had decent seat time in to judge it by, the BMW was still much stiffer though
Could be your suspension aging. The control arm bushings in our cars do not last long at all, and since I had mine replaced TWICE under warranty, my car is damn near at tight at 71K, as it was the 1st day I drove it home from the dealership. I agree the ride in the W204 is quite a bit stiffer in feel than the W203, but in my experience it never equated to that much better handling.
Old 06-17-2010, 11:04 AM
  #23  
Super Moderator
 
johnand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 24 Posts
2007 C230SS; 2014 ML350 BT
Originally Posted by zerocover
Nah I recently test drove a 328xi (a comparable BMW to a C300 4matic), while it was scary good it wasn't too far from the w204. Otherwise the 3 series easily puts everything else in its class to shame suspension wise, too bad the interiors are just as blah as the w204.
Sorry, but I don't agree there. The balance of the BMW 3-series is absolutely perfectly balanced front to rear, the feedback is better, is more nimble, and is not plagued by the same horrible oversteer. The W204 is no slouch, but always trails behind the 3-series in handling and power. But, I do agree with you, I don't like the interiors of the W204 or the new 3-series either.
Old 06-17-2010, 11:30 AM
  #24  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
One comment - most 204 suspension parts are interchangeable with 203.

Only the 204 with Advanced Agility Control in "Sport" mode can approach BMW handling.

One thing with BMW's up to & including the 5 Series. They are beautifully neutral handlers that encourage fast driving (they turn me from a sedate driver into a hooligan every time). But push the back end beyond it's limits & it will come back and bite you. It takes a hell of a driver to recover them when they let go & snap into chronic oversteer. Almost every BMW crashed in SA is due to high speed rear end snap out. Talk to anyone that races a BMW & this is always where the most work goes into the car. Trying to tame the rear suspension. This is obviously only really a problem with the more powerful models. Not a 320i for example, unless you are stupid.
Old 06-17-2010, 12:44 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
zerocover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2007 C280 4Matic
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
One comment - most 204 suspension parts are interchangeable with 203.
This is the kind of information I was looking for!
Any more information on that? I know the sway bars are swappable. But what about the springs and struts?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Mini w204 review



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 PM.