K&N Air Filter
On the applications, you choose "2002", then "Mercedes-Benz", then "230" (don't choose "230 kompressor"), then 2.3 Liter. It's part # 33-2193.
I just put one in my car. Be warned, though - lots of nervous nellies on here will tell you that OEM is the only filter to put in your car.
Just warning ya. You won't feel a difference, anyway, all placebo. The only up to the K&N is that you don't have to keep buying new filters, but after my run-in with a near death experience for my MAF sensor, I'm going to stick with paper.
Just warning ya. You won't feel a difference, anyway, all placebo. The only up to the K&N is that you don't have to keep buying new filters, but after my run-in with a near death experience for my MAF sensor, I'm going to stick with paper.
Also its been dyno proven that K & N filters did worse than the stock filters
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

Better to look after your MAF
as for dyno numbers, it depends on the car and how it is tuned. a fan in front of the car while doing the dyno is simply not enough to simulate real environment. a clean and just enough oiled K&N vs clean paper filter the K&N will provide better flow.
at least for the M272 the real reason for gains is because the oem paper filter sits and blocks about 2/3 of the air intake inlet to the airbox. The K&N does not i.e. provides more flow.
as for damaging the MAF. I've never experience anything like it. I have the BMC on the 203 and the K&N on the 204. our family beater 97 528 also had K&N since new the MAF died of rightful age, not from over oil of the filter.
Last edited by FrankW; Oct 29, 2010 at 09:45 PM.
The MAF is not a normal wear item. Usually particle blasting or chemical contamination damage them. Engine abuse like lots of stop and go, peak rpm use, heavy loads, etc. can let unused fuel accumulate in the intake ....like that goop around the throttle body flap....and possibly make it's way up to the MAF as well. But usually most people never need to replace the MAF - except for those that have over oiled filters.
If they did, the C class intake system would be much better thought out, I'd hope.
I know changing filters and pre filter intake tracks is popular but unless you're going to cool the air charge more I think people are wasting their time, money, and affecting reliability. But I did they same thing 'way back when' so I''m not knocking it. Just saying.
The real question is.....can the motor take advantage of it? No. If something as simple to engineer in at the beginning of engine development like air filtering would add even one hp the engineers would do it.
The MAF is not a normal wear item. Usually particle blasting or chemical contamination damage them. Engine abuse like lots of stop and go, peak rpm use, heavy loads, etc. can let unused fuel accumulate in the intake ....like that goop around the throttle body flap....and possibly make it's way up to the MAF as well. But usually most people never need to replace the MAF - except for those that have over oiled filters.
the MAF in the 528 died after some 150k miles + 13 yrs in the sun. I just recently replaced it. like i've said, it had nothing to do with the K&N.

The only way to achieve reasonable power gains is to improve volumetric efficiency of the engine & drop IAT to lower levels. This would achieve better cylinder filling with more dense air. To do this would require a complete inlet system & airbox redesign.
If anybody has an opportunity - they should watch the Cummins training movie "Operation Hourglass". This shows just how little dirt/dust it takes to destroy an engine. About one heaped teaspoon full over time.

Huge respects to the authorities here, but K&N and a recharge kit. Done.
Ed









