




















W203/CL203/S203 TIRE Discussion Thread - Every question on TIRES

What I'm still wondering is if I do go with 255's in the rear would it be wiser to go with 225's in the front to keep a more staggered look? Or will the 235's just look better while filling the wheel well better?
I see the 225/255 combo is actually closer to the original wheel size but it seems most on here running 19's go with the 235's up front. Is it based solely on the wider look or is it some other reason? Does it just look better?
Just want to get this right. Remember they are 19" Brabus V's on a c320 sedan on stock suspension for now.
Thanks to anyone who replies!
So, why do so many go with a 235 front? Is is just to have slightly better handling? Any help is appreciated.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
How do u like the Proxes 4? I replaced my rears and put them on but I'm not very fond of them. Definitely better than the Continental's the car came with which I think are the absolute worst tire I've ever driven on. But the proxes seem to have very limited traction in the wet. My rear end slides or loses traction very easily. Best tires I've had so far are the Michelin Pilot sports and Bridgestone Potenza's.
I like the Falkens 452's, Hankook Ventus V4's, and Toyo 4's also but they don't have 255/30 sizes. What are everyone's opinions on mixing brands front and back?
From what I've read it seems no one really has problems with 235 up front?
All opinions are appreciated. Thanks a ton!
I have a set of Lorinser LM6 replica rims and they are all 18"x8.5" ET35.
But since no one really has talked much about the ET I wanted to hear what you guys have to say about this setup and give suggestions. Maybe it doesn't even affect it much.
I have a w203 with the Sport option so it is lowered a little.
I want to have a staggered look and would have gotten a narrower front rim but had to take them all at 8.5".
I have gathered that 225/40/18 should be totally ok for the front.
On the back I want to put 255/35/18 on the back but someone had mentioned that its a little on the big side for an 8.5" rim. Is that true or has anyone done that?
What about rubbing? Does anyone have an et35 on the back rim and running that size that I want? Also would it be better for me to get a round form wheel or could I still manage fine with a square edge since its 18"?
Some tire shops have recommended 245/35 but to have just a little better staggered look I would want 255.
Any comments?
Thanks!
I have a set of Lorinser LM6 replica rims and they are all 18"x8.5" ET35.
But since no one really has talked much about the ET I wanted to hear what you guys have to say about this setup and give suggestions. Maybe it doesn't even affect it much.
I have a w203 with the Sport option so it is lowered a little.
I want to have a staggered look and would have gotten a narrower front rim but had to take them all at 8.5".
I have gathered that 225/40/18 should be totally ok for the front.
On the back I want to put 255/35/18 on the back but someone had mentioned that its a little on the big side for an 8.5" rim. Is that true or has anyone done that?
What about rubbing? Does anyone have an et35 on the back rim and running that size that I want? Also would it be better for me to get a round form wheel or could I still manage fine with a square edge since its 18"?
Some tire shops have recommended 245/35 but to have just a little better staggered look I would want 255.
Any comments?
Thanks!
Great tyre, quiet as the OEM's on the highway, grippy in snow and ice and rides nicely, though not as sporty on turn-in as the OEM Michelins - I don't think this is a big problem for the winter (I live in Canada so we get a lot of snow :-) ).
Putting the winters on the stock 17" rims gave me the excuse to get 18" for the summer - they have just arrived with Goodyear F1 asymmetrics on. I'll get them on tonight and see how they go. They have comments on Tire Rack so I'm expecting good things.




anyone else got those?
Luke stated in the tire discussion forum that they'd never had a tire that good at that price point in the Max Performance...er...whichever category it was...
I didn't get the protection plan though...bad idea?
The website says I have 14 days to add it.




To answer the question, I drive over hwy 17 every day, which is like this mountain freeway, with 4 lanes total with a concrete divider in the middle.
Speed limit is 50 mph, but with the BS's it's easy to cruise comfortably at 70 or higher.
Also they're staggered so no rotation. No burnouts for me.
They wore pretty evenly considering my camber is about 3-4 degrees out.
So, the backs are now pretty much gone at about 11K miles, and I noticed I have a nail in one of them, so F' it. I was going to buy Fuzion's but they're freakin' backordered for like a month. TR was trying to talk me in the RE760's but, ah...not sold on that...then I saw these
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/...odel=HTR+Z+III
Up against tires costing 2.5 times the price, they kicked ****, including the RE050A Pole positions, and Conti 3's. And came out ahead in many categories.
Just the rears for now, my front's still have some tread, but with a 300 treadwear rating vs. 140 for the BS's, I'm hoping they'll last a while.
you doing burnouts and brake stands like crazy? I got almost double than that on my OE Conti's (19's) on the M3 and I have pictures of burnouts and launches on those tires (and they weren't that worn when I changed em out).
your alignment bad or something? daaaaamn, I thought the RE050A's were supposed to be good, but if you're eating through them in 8k miles...
anyone else got those?
Luke stated in the tire discussion forum that they'd never had a tire that good at that price point in the Max Performance...er...whichever category it was...
I didn't get the protection plan though...bad idea?
The website says I have 14 days to add it.







sooo sad. LOL.
