Kompressor Questions
I have a question regarding the superchargers used in 2002 C230K Coupe and 2003 C230K Coupe. I understand that the 2002 has a 2.3L engine while the 2003 has a 1.8L engine. Who makes the supercharger that is used in the 2002 C230K? And who makes the supercharger that is used in the 2003 C230K? Is there any major difference between the two? Thanks.
The 2003 uses the all new 1.8L M271 engine- the C230K Coupe was its first application. Its also in the C230 Sedan, and the upcoming new SLK(supposedly making 200HP in the SLK). It makes 189 HP and 190ft-lbs of torque from supposedly 10 or 11 pounds of boost from a modified M45. By many accounts, that's the upper limit of boost from the M45.
just a minor correction: C180, and C200k both use the new 1.8 engine, so the C230k really isn't the first application. 180 being n/a and 200 with less boost from the s/c.
I could be wrong but from where I live (Australia), all 4 cylinder W203 are using the same 1.8L engine. So 2003 C180K, C200K and C230K are all 1.8L supercharged with different level of boost/tuning.
The previous model years used motors with displacements indicated by the badging.
- BT
I could be wrong but from where I live (Australia), all 4 cylinder W203 are using the same 1.8L engine. So 2003 C180K, C200K and C230K are all 1.8L supercharged with different level of boost/tuning.
oops, nevermind, should've said 180k not 180...
Last edited by FrankW; May 24, 2003 at 05:29 PM.
You are correct, sir. Well, for the 2003+ models, anyway.
The previous model years used motors with displacements indicated by the badging.
- BT
[s]
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
yes they use the same engine, but not only the boost but the compression ratio is different (180k, 200k, 230k)
[s]

I'm not being a cheapstake but its just that this new 1.8L C230K is not available through my country authorised MB agent.
Last edited by gmabm; May 25, 2003 at 09:22 AM.
So is it possible to fit a 1.8L C230K ECU into a 1.8L C180K and resulting 193HP?

I'm not a cheapstake but its just that this new 1.8L C230K is not available in my country authorised MB agent.
yes they use the same engine, but not only the boost but the compression ratio is different (180k, 200k, 230k)
[s]
No, that wouldn't work, because of the different boost levels and compression ratios.
Therefore I believe changing of ECU is able to increase the power from engine. Moreover the displacements or rather the entire block is the same.
But I have noticed that there's another mechanical aspect which is not quite the same between the models are its gearbox ratios (or just simply a different final drive).
Last edited by gmabm; May 25, 2003 at 09:20 AM.
The boost is controllered by the ECU, different boost levels would effect different compression ratios in the cylinders.
sorry, this may be the dumbest question asked since i know nothing about engines. can't we just changed the compression ratio and get more power?
To change the compression ratio, you have to change the pistons. To do that, the engine must be removed and disassembled.
Nope, boost is not controlled by the ECU. It's controlled by how fast the supercharger is spinning. You can only control boost with the ECU on a turbo.
But would the C180K ECU able to handle the addition fuel feed of a higher boost?? :P
What about changing the pulley, does it helps to increase boost?
But would the C180K ECU able to handle the addition fuel feed of a higher boost?? :P
As for fuel, there are different fuel settings and these can be changed by the dealer, and it changes the air:fuel ratio under certain conditions.
If that is the case, changing of pistons are not sufficient, we might also need to upgrade the crankshaft, conrod (& cam maybe?).
As for fuel, there are different fuel settings and these can be changed by the dealer, and it changes the air:fuel ratio under certain conditions.
Now we are ready to use the engine, right? Wrong. The ECU might need be remapped if you are still going to use 91 or 93 octane gas. The engine will be more prone to detonate with the higher compression, so the ECU will need to retard the ignition advance. To make sure, you will need to do several tuning sessions on a dyno. On the other hand, you could use $4 to $5 per gallon racing gasoline.
Now, the engine is ready to go. Enjoy the break in period.
Is this controlled mechanically by regulators or electronically compensated by ECU?







