Any real world advantages to a staggerd wheel setup?
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Any real world advantages to a staggerd wheel setup?
For every day driving, is there any advantage in having a staggered setup other than looks? I just hopped over to the C32 forum and there is someone that just put on a set of 18 x 8.5 AMG Type IVs non-staggered.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...threadid=52970
Also, can I install a 19 x 8.5 with a 30mm offset front and rear? How about the rear with 19 x 9.5 and 40mm offset? Keep in mind that I will have a 2004.5 with the larger front brakes.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...threadid=52970
Also, can I install a 19 x 8.5 with a 30mm offset front and rear? How about the rear with 19 x 9.5 and 40mm offset? Keep in mind that I will have a 2004.5 with the larger front brakes.
Last edited by Sincity; 11-24-2003 at 09:12 PM.
#2
Re: Any real world advantages to a staggerd wheel setup?
Originally posted by Sincity
For every day driving, is there any advantage in having a staggered setup other than looks? I just hopped over to the C32 forum and there is someone that just put on a set of 18 x 8.5 AMG Type IVs non-staggered.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...threadid=52970
Also, can I install a 19 x 8.5 with a 30mm offset front and rear? How about the rear with 19 x 9.5 and 40mm offset? Keep in mind that I will have a 2004.5 with the larger front brakes.
For every day driving, is there any advantage in having a staggered setup other than looks? I just hopped over to the C32 forum and there is someone that just put on a set of 18 x 8.5 AMG Type IVs non-staggered.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...threadid=52970
Also, can I install a 19 x 8.5 with a 30mm offset front and rear? How about the rear with 19 x 9.5 and 40mm offset? Keep in mind that I will have a 2004.5 with the larger front brakes.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
The tires and wheels work in concert with the suspension and brakes to provide grip both fore/aft and laterally. "Most" performance cars come with tires and wheels that are size optimized for the suspension. Changing sizes, weights, etc. can and usually will change the way a car handles.
However, like Lynn said, on the street, most people won't notice the difference.
However, like Lynn said, on the street, most people won't notice the difference.
#4
It depends on which wheel you are talking about. Offset is not the only thing to worry, there is the back spacing clearance too. ET30 front should be okay for your car, however, ET40 for the rear is a bit too high, your rear wheels will tug in more than what they should be, it wont look as good.
The wheels that "trips" is using are 18x8.5 all around. However, he has 225/255 tires, although the wheels are not staggered, the tires are. Having slightly wider tires on the rear will give better cornering and more grip when launching. And more importantly, they look better too.
Getting 19" wheels is more for cosmetic purpose than anything else. 19's are more heavier and with more rotation mass. If you dont mind that your car's performance will suffer a bit, 19's is the way to go. But if you want to have the look and yet, maintain the performance as close as possible, then you should get 18's.
The wheels that "trips" is using are 18x8.5 all around. However, he has 225/255 tires, although the wheels are not staggered, the tires are. Having slightly wider tires on the rear will give better cornering and more grip when launching. And more importantly, they look better too.
Getting 19" wheels is more for cosmetic purpose than anything else. 19's are more heavier and with more rotation mass. If you dont mind that your car's performance will suffer a bit, 19's is the way to go. But if you want to have the look and yet, maintain the performance as close as possible, then you should get 18's.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Hey, there is also a disadvantage...you can't rotate the fronts to the rears so you will wear down all the tires more quickly. Just something to think about.
I had both a staggered and regular setup and it was mostly for show as I didn't feel a difference.
Erik
I had both a staggered and regular setup and it was mostly for show as I didn't feel a difference.
Erik
Trending Topics
#8
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 C230K Sedan
Even though it is odd, I must disagree with the comments made by the more senior contributors of this forum. Depending on your driving style, the staggered setup will / will not help your handling. The first upgrade that I did to my 03 C230K sedan is to move the rear wheels to 17x8.5 with 245/40-17 tires. Before the switch, I noticed that the ESP of the car is busy adjusting to the traction of the rear end when I tried to pull the car out of a tight corner. Once I put in the wider tires, the ESP will only occasionally blink when I power the car out of the corner. I spent a fair bit of money for this upgrade as I have all new rims and tires; but it solve my frustration when exiting corners.
Also, I have put in the H&R coilver 2 months ago. I find that 17" rims are probably the most you want to go for this setup.
Also, I have put in the H&R coilver 2 months ago. I find that 17" rims are probably the most you want to go for this setup.
#9
Wider rears are good
if you have a car with 349 hp. I dont think a c320 would benefit much.
When I went from 245's in the rear to 255's I noticed a big gain in launching grip, due to having more contact patch to put the power to the ground. Someone else mentioned that there is much less ESP activity, and I can agree with that. Handling wise, there may be some benefit.
When I went from 245's in the rear to 255's I noticed a big gain in launching grip, due to having more contact patch to put the power to the ground. Someone else mentioned that there is much less ESP activity, and I can agree with that. Handling wise, there may be some benefit.
#11
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Oro Valley, AZ
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 C240 6spd
Re: Wider rears are good
Originally posted by s4iscool
if you have a car with 349 hp. I dont think a c320 would benefit much.
When I went from 245's in the rear to 255's I noticed a big gain in launching grip, due to having more contact patch to put the power to the ground. Someone else mentioned that there is much less ESP activity, and I can agree with that. Handling wise, there may be some benefit.
if you have a car with 349 hp. I dont think a c320 would benefit much.
When I went from 245's in the rear to 255's I noticed a big gain in launching grip, due to having more contact patch to put the power to the ground. Someone else mentioned that there is much less ESP activity, and I can agree with that. Handling wise, there may be some benefit.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Any improvement in handling after a staggered tire/wheel upgrade only means that the originals were not optimized for the car. One can only guess that price had something to do with the decision to go non-staggered.
#14
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Oro Valley, AZ
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 C240 6spd
Originally posted by E55AMG99
Any improvement in handling after a staggered tire/wheel upgrade only means that the originals were not optimized for the car. One can only guess that price had something to do with the decision to go non-staggered.
Any improvement in handling after a staggered tire/wheel upgrade only means that the originals were not optimized for the car. One can only guess that price had something to do with the decision to go non-staggered.
And looks is always a factor also. Larger/wider wheels/tires do look better on most applications.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally posted by shtatc
I think the originals were probably "optimized" for those who want comfort.
I think the originals were probably "optimized" for those who want comfort.
#16
thinking about rotating the tires....
dont worry.,
pardon me, if i'm wrong.
you can dismount the rear right tires and mounted it on left rear wheels and vice versa.
i have done it to my car is worth around 2000++
thanks.
dont worry.,
pardon me, if i'm wrong.
you can dismount the rear right tires and mounted it on left rear wheels and vice versa.
i have done it to my car is worth around 2000++
thanks.
#17
thinking about rotating the tires....
dont worry.,
pardon me, if i'm wrong.
you can dismount the rear right tires and mounted it on left rear wheels and vice versa.
i have done it to my car is worth around 2000++
thanks.
dont worry.,
pardon me, if i'm wrong.
you can dismount the rear right tires and mounted it on left rear wheels and vice versa.
i have done it to my car is worth around 2000++
thanks.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 C300 4matic
You can only rotate side to side if your tires are non-directional, or if you dismount and re-mount them. You can only rotate front to back if your tires are not staggered.
As for traction advantages, I would say that it helps in a straight line if you really need it. But as for cornering, if you add grip to the rear, then you are just going to understeer more. What most Mercedes' need is more front end grip, NOT rear end grip.
As for traction advantages, I would say that it helps in a straight line if you really need it. But as for cornering, if you add grip to the rear, then you are just going to understeer more. What most Mercedes' need is more front end grip, NOT rear end grip.