Pics of face lifted W203 C-Class!
Mitte 2002 kommen die neuen 4-Zylinder Motoren in die C-Klasse. Der C 200 CGI Benzindirekteinspritzer kommt dagegen erst Ende 2002. Zudem werden einige Bauteile der C-Klasse modifiziert.
Translation: In the middle of 2002 the new 4-Zylinder engines comes into the C-class. C 200 cgi gasoline direct A splash comes against it only at the end of of 2002. Besides some construction units of the C-class are modified.
Source: Jes Mercedes
This is only a minor facelift, the mid-life face lift is expected at the end of 2003 in Europe.
Looking better!
-G'day-
Edit: C-Coupe pic on the 2nd page
Last edited by C-Kompii; Apr 18, 2002 at 02:09 PM.
I kinda like the modern looking new headlights. I wonder if we'd be able to fit the on the MY02 C-coupe?
Thanks for the pics!
I kinda like the modern looking new headlights. I wonder if we'd be able to fit the on the MY02 C-coupe?

With projector lights that small, why is the huge lamp area needed? It really looks bad, because the C has such massive principal lights, with all that empty "pseudo-reflector" area.
To me the current lights are FAR preferable. If I ever get a sedan I'll seriously think about mounting early lights in it.
D'oh - I mis-spelled because earlier!
Last edited by Mike T.; Apr 13, 2002 at 12:35 AM.
Trending Topics
My concern is the HUGE piece of chromed backing in the main headlight aperture, with the TINY peep-hole projector orifices for the low beam and turn signal.
To me it looks like a 1990 Volvo 240 DL would if it had only one of those ultra-tiny rectangular sealed beam lights from the 1980s in its huge rectangular headlight aperture, the rest of the area being useless mirrored surface.
In other words, if the designer of the W 203 knew that two ~8 cm diameter holes per side was all that was needed for the low beams and the turn signal, would (s)he have created such a huge area for them to sit in? Somehow, I doubt it. These large apertures were sized to fit conventional reflectors for both the low beam and turn signal.
On the other hand, I was not a fan of the C sedan's heavy-eyelid (drooping eyelid) effect due to the odd shape of the turn signal portion of the light unit. But that was a lot better than this!
The most successful uses of the projector beam that I've seen have been with Pininfarina designs, notably the Peugeot 406 Coupé, whose outboard headlights are projector beam type, and are housed within a common light unit with the conventional driving light reflector and turn signal...but this car's lights are very narrow where the projector beam unit is, so there's no huge extraneous area within the light unit, surrounding the ~8 cm aperture.
This critique would not prevent me from buying a sedan, but I still feel it's an aesthetic change for the worse.
Last edited by Mike T.; Apr 13, 2002 at 12:52 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Last edited by DtS; Apr 13, 2002 at 08:48 AM.
And from my observation, it is an option for the new CLK
http://www.geocities.com/jesmb2002/genf/genf1.jpg
-G'day-
Even though everyone already knows what the current car looks like, I made a composite image for better comparing:
Last edited by JustinTRW; Apr 13, 2002 at 12:21 PM.
So is the C-class sedan going to look like this for MY2003 or MY2004?
-G'day-
having said that, the new is the way to go. there is definitely a gestalt of the projector lights and mb is finally catching up. if anything the soft peanut may need to go in favor of the new SL type of lights which seem more appropriate.
Expect this new look early next year in North America,
-G'day-
Hopefully this information will be officially reached soon, so I can decided whether to wait for my MY2003 car, or purchase one that is available now.
Perhaps those that posted these images could point to a source?
having said that, the new is the way to go. there is definitely a gestalt of the projector lights and mb is finally catching up. if anything the soft peanut may need to go in favor of the new SL type of lights which seem more appropriate.
One of the reasons I picked a Mercedes-Benz was the sales point that the cars are on a 7-year product plan and will not change from year to year. These headlights will date the earlier models far in advance of the 7-year plan. I'm not happy about that and I will feel a bit betrayed.
Add to this insult the fact that these new headlights (if true) are frankly, quite UGLY, and reminiscent of altezza taillights on the IS300 (Puhey!) Hopefully these represent only the HID optional setups, while the standard lights will retain the "traditional" Peanut shape... through 2006, thank you very much.



