just saw a fleet of 05 C Sedans...
When is the last time you saw a 325i with an M body kit? It will never happen as BMW takes care of its M brand. MB is continuing to dilute AMG. Ive only seen a C32 a few times in my life on the road, they looked somewhat distinctive with the AMG kit. I was seriously looking at a used C32 in the future but not with this crap. For those who bought there 05 C class, im not hating on your cars, but just disgusted by MBs decision making. Oh well, whatever sells I Guess.
Last edited by Guest0001; Jun 7, 2004 at 03:31 PM.
In conclusion AMG is always an AMG, a non AMG cannot be an AMG by having the body kit and a couple of AMG bages.
BTW BMW now offeres performance package, with the underbody skirt looks like an M. But you can always make out an M by the side vent or what ever that is.

How about the 05' C-class compared to 02-03' AMG? From exterior view, the only different is the tail pipe. I bought my 03' AMG because it had the special appearance, now, when the 05' came out, my car lost the values immediately.
Trending Topics
No C230k of any vintage is going to drive like your AMG - if that isn't enough, what exactly do you need? Why spend the money in the first place - it's easier and cheaper to buy the various cosmetic add-ons, if appearance is the main thing that matters? That's always been true, and will be out into the future.
I'm mystified by that set of priorities, but then, to each their own...
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
As if AMG is about appearance, in the first place....I always thought it was about engines and suspensions and brakes...silly me...
go search for what I've said over 10 plus times if you want my opinion on this. blah...
How about the 05' C-class compared to 02-03' AMG? From exterior view, the only different is the tail pipe. I bought my 03' AMG because it had the special appearance, now, when the 05' came out, my car lost the values immediately.
seriously some of you guys are acting like it's the end of the world, it's ridiculous.
it's like you guys never knew AMG bodykits was available for the C-class as the AMG evolution or AMG sport pkg through out the world. Or maybe this is all NEWS to you?

The reason that I bought my C32 because it have a powerful horsepower compared to a CLK500 (my first choice) - Also, I could save at least $20,000 (Cdn. $) (C32 vs. CLK500) that can beat the M3 logically (is it?). The last reason that I chose the C32 because of its aggresive appearance.
I was pissed off because my C32 cannot be identified easily if people are looking at the front compared to the 05 C-class.
Hope, you guys will not mad of me.
passing the platter to Ultra.....
Ritz or Triscut......cheddar or brie?
(cheese & crackers to go with your WHINE)
Last edited by Rick; Jun 9, 2004 at 06:11 AM.
When is the last time you saw a 325ci with a M bodykit as standard equipment?
I sure hope a $35,000 car and a $55,000 looks distinctively different. Im not questioning the AMGs performance or credentials compared to a C230, that is absurd. But it is also absurd to slap on a bodykit to make the looks identical to that of AMG cars.
I sure hope a $35,000 car and a $55,000 looks distinctively different.
It is becoming quite apparent that these people who own c32 AMG's want them to look different with the intention of impressing people. Now that their so-called perceived individuality is gone they feel as if they've been reduced in stature.
How shallow and insecure is that?
Appreciate it for what it is, a pure driver's car. You don't like it? Go get somethin' else.
Why? so other people know what you have? No one gives a ****.
It is becoming quite apparent that these people who own c32 AMG's want them to look different with the intention of impressing people. Now that their so-called perceived individuality is gone they feel as if they've been reduced in stature.
How shallow and insecure is that?
Appreciate it for what it is, a pure driver's car. You don't like it? Go get somethin' else.
They know the market loves the AMG look so they whored it the **** out.
I own both cars and all I can say is when I commute in my C230K it's feels like the car does not even move.
Then I get in the C32 and feel a gazzilion times better...
I am going to wait till 06 and get the 07 model AMG
During that time I will enjoi kicking the crap out of every poser AMG I see..
i can imagine the difference from the 1.8 to the AMG LOL! I never driven the AMG but the 1.8 is horrible slow. I wish they put the 2.3 in the sedan.
It is kind of quick..kind of..but stock the 04.5 I have handles really good and the wheels/ brake package blows the C320 away.
Not as slow as the C240 and Handles allot better than the C320
It is kind of quick..kind of..but stock the 04.5 I have handles really good and the wheels/ brake package blows the C320 away.
Handling was about even in my book. both 320 sport and 230k. There was still roll and floaty ride. only downside the C class in general is handling which can be fixed.
guys answer this question
When is the last time you saw a 325ci with a M bodykit as standard equipment?
I sure hope a $35,000 car and a $55,000 looks distinctively different. Im not questioning the AMGs performance or credentials compared to a C230, that is absurd. But it is also absurd to slap on a bodykit to make the looks identical to that of AMG cars.
huh? Doesnt the C320 sport and C230k have the same wheel/ brakes?
Handling was about even in my book. both 320 sport and 230k. There was still roll and floaty ride. only downside the C class in general is handling which can be fixed.
Not to sure, but I never saw a C320 sport with 13 inch cross drilled AMG Brakes or staggard wheels?
The C230Ksedan is not boaty IMO at all, In fact it is very tight and responds well. I was very suprised.
I see a black 325ci with an M body kit and wing every day. She parked right next to t a real M3 (with the gills in the fenders) once...and was embarrassed that hers didn't look as good. Granted, it may not have been standard equipment,but then the MB C/E/S sport body kit IS different from the respective AMG kit.
There AMG options on the other E,S,CL models but they are NOT standard equipment, rather $5,000 options. your choice to look like a AMG or not. rather than have it standard equipment like a C Class. even the CLK500 suffers from this.
Last edited by Guest0001; Jun 9, 2004 at 07:20 PM.








