C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

05 C230 sedan or Acura TL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-24-2004 | 02:52 AM
  #226  
Guest0001
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Why are we still arguing about this?

**** has been said over and over. Lets give it a rest and move on!
Old 09-28-2004 | 10:59 PM
  #227  
fasteddie's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Eastern Ontario
2001 ML320 E, 2003 C230K Sport Sedan
Originally Posted by Alias
That extra $8000 could buy a pretty nice Rolex... not to mention the money saved due to the fact that the Acura TL is far more reliable, and that the parts are much cheaper to replace/repair upon conclusion of the warranty.

Sure, but why stop there. Get a Mazda 6, or a Maxima, or even an Altima. They are nearly comperable to the Acura....and you can save another 5 or 7 K off the price of a Acura. What is more is neither of those vehicles have the long, long, long ....long history of trans troubles that the Acura has!!!!

(Even Ford got rid of their trans troubles abour 20 years ago)

Oooops. Sorry. Forgot myself!!!!

Right.......leave it alone....Acura is Mercedes...merc is ac..r.. Sleeeeeep, dream good thoughs.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
Old 09-28-2004 | 11:39 PM
  #228  
EKY's Avatar
EKY
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Mililani, Hawaii
2006 Acura RL - Aspec rims/spoiler, JDM grille
In all honesty, I believe both are great cars. What it comes down to is personal preference. This debate could go on and on, just as if we were to debate about which ice cream flavor is the best.

The Legend IMO is one of the best cars that Acura had produced(and the NSX). It's a shame they seemed to take a few steps backwards after introducing the RL. (I've owned both). A pristine Legend coupe with the Type-II 230hp motor is a 10 year old car I'd pounce on if I had the chance.

I also considered a TL since my friend just purchased one. Granted, he may have more features (i.e. bluetooth, DVD-audio etc..), but the main thing is I'm happy with my C230K sedan. That's the bottom line right?
Old 09-29-2004 | 01:27 AM
  #229  
mick1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
2005 C320wz
Originally Posted by Alias
That extra $8000 could buy a pretty nice Rolex... not to mention the money saved due to the fact that the Acura TL is far more reliable, and that the parts are much cheaper to replace/repair upon conclusion of the warranty.
i don't know. i would think people who are into rolex watches would want to get a mercedes-benz instead of an acura. rolex is a prestigious brand and so is mercedes.

on the other hand, people who like acuras may not like a rolex because it's heavy and overpriced. they may prefer a low maintenance watch like a seiko better.

Last edited by mick1; 09-29-2004 at 01:32 AM.
Old 09-29-2004 | 01:40 AM
  #230  
!!!!!NJ Drive's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: ...
...
Originally Posted by EKY
In all honesty, I believe both are great cars. What it comes down to is personal preference. This debate could go on and on, just as if we were to debate about which ice cream flavor is the best.

The Legend IMO is one of the best cars that Acura had produced(and the NSX). It's a shame they seemed to take a few steps backwards after introducing the RL. (I've owned both). A pristine Legend coupe with the Type-II 230hp motor is a 10 year old car I'd pounce on if I had the chance.

I also considered a TL since my friend just purchased one. Granted, he may have more features (i.e. bluetooth, DVD-audio etc..), but the main thing is I'm happy with my C230K sedan. That's the bottom line right?
AGREED...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 05 C230 sedan or Acura TL



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:48 PM.