My walk around BMW/MB/Audi - 2008
I went to Audi first. I like Audis but 9 out of 10 people who I know who have owned them did not experience anything good from the A4 series. For 2008 Audi has some very exciting models coming out with fantastic engines and awd systems. I also like the cockpit as it is very snug. But I decided right then and there that Audi was not for me when I was told that the X-warranty is $5100.00 US I have owned a lot of Land Rovers and never paid anything like that for a warranty. I keep my cars for along time so this interests me and its a great selling point for the future
Then I went to BMW. On paper the 335xi is by the far the best performing car for fuel, power, handling, and anything related to performance. BMW also has the best customer satisfaction and the only company to stay with pre-paid services, making the buyer only have to pay for tires and insurance. But I really don't like the lines of the car and I am unfamiliar with BMW's reliability other than a few friends who had a lot of issues with 2002-2005 3 series. But they take care of their customers
MB was my final stop. Both BMW/MB x-warranty is between 12-1900$ US for 100K miles/6 years. I like the C series a lot but found some things on the interior to be a little cheap. Aesthetically MB takes the cake for me. The 350 with 270hp is plenty hp for me as there is no place near me I can open up a car without getting a ticket or being unsafe period. I never go to a track.
I'm going to go test drive them all and will report back from a noob buyer who knows how to drive and push a car but not exactly going to pick up on every single charachteristic, just the ones that are valuable to day to day performance and daily life.
comments are welcome or things to look for when driving
thx
I had a B6 A4 3.2, and loved it. Had a problem with a fuel pump, and that was it during the 35k miles of ownership (about the most I ever own a car). The extended warranty quote was so high because the sales guy smelled a sucker. Not sure why you'd buy an extended warranty on a car up front anyway? Are they usually cheaper that way?
I have a current style 330 (e90) and I couldn't agree with you more on the styling. I bought it because it is extremely fun to drive ... when it can be driven hard. But man is it ugly. I would suspect, since BMW have traditionally done a minor front and rear clip refresh every 2yrs of the model cycle, that it's due for a bit of a change here very soon. That might also explain why the lease incentives on 335s a phenomenal right now.
Felt the same about the C. 350 motor has more than enough power, looks ***** on the exterior, but some of the interior skimping is glaringly obvious. Almost american brand-ish.
My concern is that they're going to make it look like a 4dr version the A5 which I don't like.
Trending Topics
Audi A4 - Solid product, a tad short on driving fun compared to the others. Exquisite detailing inside and out as you'd expect from Audi. Quattro is a great performance feature, especially when taking corners at speed, as well as for driving in foul weather. The A4 also seems to be reliable.
Merc C - Love it. I think tis' the best comrpomise between sport and comfort beyond a shadow of a doubt. Solid build quality that reminds a lot of the W124 190 E. I think most issues with the interior lie with design, not quality. Lack of some features known to MB is somewhat disappointing, but a cure will no doubt reveal itself within the next model year or so.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
OP, if you like the C-class better than A4 and 3-series than go for it but I just want to remind you that Benz is known as passenger car which less fun to drive than the other two. But, if you are in passenger seat, the car feels really good.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,293437,00.html
it really belongs on the E-Class board, but it is at least a bit on point here if you are going to be doing some general comparisons between BMW and MB
i didn't write it and don't endorse it, but it should make the MB people happy and the Beamer peeps defensive
There is some truth to that though. The tests are just simulated conditions and you can't simulate all real-world possibilities.
One of the things that I learned that really disturbed me was the sled they use to test offset front impact is always the same mass. So that test doesn't take into account the varying masses of other vehicles.
On the roads where I live, there's a 90% chance something hitting you is going to be a big monster 5000lb full size SUV.
Results for the '07 w211 were actually worse than the '06 w211.
"The Mercedes E class was re-engineered for the 2007 model year with an emphasis on improving occupant protection in side impact crashes."
-For a large, expensive Mercedes, this is somewhat un-acceptable. It placed much lower than the A6, GS, M35/45, ES350, and TL. The base Chevrolet Malibu, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, VW Rabbit, Subaru Impreza and Honda Civic did BETTER. It was on-par with the Chevrolet Cobalt.
Pretty embarassing for Mercedes. And they actually tried to improve side-impact performance for 2007...


