The interior looks cheap, sorry.
So yo, You are the one thats
and
LOL!Also, I never said that BMW didn't utilize carryover engines. Why would you even mention that?
Last edited by Spoonie; Sep 12, 2007 at 03:47 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Don’t think for a second that anyone believes that your original name-calling-attack was "bait". You responded directly to my post by quoting it. When someone quotes another person, out of respect for the person being quoted, they are allowed a reply. 2 college degrees didn’t teach you anything. I have 0 degrees and you don’t see me lashing out at people calling them "stupid” (unlike you). And then you attempt to justify the name calling by saying that the insult was bait. You are a piece of work.

Last edited by Spoonie; Sep 13, 2007 at 11:02 AM.




Are you saying that just because BMW utilized carry over engines in the past, that I shouldn’t purchase a new BMW without a carryover engine because of what happened in the past? Still doesn’t make sense dude.




Are you saying that just because BMW utilized carry over engines in the past, that I shouldn’t purchase a new BMW without a carryover engine because of what happened in the past? Still doesn’t make sense dude.

Again I point out, one of your reasons for not liking/buying a 2008 W204 C-Class was carry over engines. Again, which make no sense since you drive a chassis that did the same. Now you are hedgeing over to sounding like you would buy one if it had a new engine. You either like the car or you don't. So, now you can stop debating the carryover engine point and wait for the new engines to hit in 2, 3 or 4 or 5 year or whatever. Better yet buy the brand new engine in a C-Class the C63 AMG and we all will shut up!
If you are disappointed that the new W204 didn't come with a new engine fine. Heck, over half of this forum thinks MB should've put a more powerful engine in there.
But the bottom line is that the car is what it is...either you like it or you don't. If you don't like it because you wish it had more power say that. The fact that last year's 280 engine is this year's 300 engine is pointless. It is what it is.

Again I point out, one of your reasons for not liking/buying a 2008 W204 C-Class was carry over engines. Again, which make no sense since you drive a chassis that did the same. Now you are hedgeing over to sounding like you would buy one if it had a new engine. You either like the car or you don't. So, now you can stop debating the carryover engine point and wait for the new engines to hit in 2, 3 or 4 or 5 year or whatever. Better yet buy the brand new engine in a C-Class the C63 AMG and we all will shut up!

Just because a chassis used a carryover engine when it was first introduced, doesn’t mean that I won’t purchase that model when they update the engine. Why shouldn’t I consider it? I guess I’m not ever supposed to even consider the car, even after they upgraded the engine? Reason? Because it had a carryover engine in the past? LOL! If that’s the premise of your argument then it still doesn’t make any sense.
Last edited by Spoonie; Sep 13, 2007 at 11:41 AM.




Last edited by E55 KEV; Sep 13, 2007 at 11:52 AM.
I don't like the C350 because I wish it had more power.




I considered the 328 but waited for the 330. Is there anything wrong with that?




