Ethanol in your C300
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 C300 4Matic
Ethanol in your C300
A month or so ago I filled up on ethanol in my C300. Only problem is I have a 4matic and it isn't supposed to run on ethanol. I guess the salesman was confused when he told me the car would run on ethanol because when i took it to the MB dealership they said my 4matic doesn't take ethanol. They ran some tests on it and found it wasn't causing any problems and they recommended just driving it out and filling back up with premium. Over the next few days I didn't notice anything different (other than the check engine light being on). No spark knocking. Nothing out of the ordinary. To top it all off the mileage seemed to be the same if not better than the premium I usually get. I haven't put any ethanol in it since then but i was wondering if anyone else has done the same? Obviously I have discovered that putting ethanol in my car doesn't screw it up so my next question would be do you think that the prolonged use of ethanol in the car would cause any harm? My father is an old school mechanic and he says you can put anything in a car and if it doesn't spark-knock then you can use it. Granted he's a ford/chevy guy. What kind of impact would it have on a benz?
Is this one of those deals where they say it doesn't support ethanol because tests didn't meet their benchmarks, expectations, and/or goals?
Is this one of those deals where they say it doesn't support ethanol because tests didn't meet their benchmarks, expectations, and/or goals?
Last edited by kamachi81; 07-08-2008 at 03:01 PM.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2008 R350 & 2008 C300
The computer systems in cars today are smart enough to adjust themselves when the wrong grade of fuel is put in, such as using 89 octane and the usual outcome is less horsepower and lower gas mileage. In this situation I'm going to side with Mercedes Benz and say that its not a wise idea to be using Ethanol in a car it's not recommended in. They do the tests, they know their engine's better than we do, if they say not to do it then I'm sure they know something we don't. Sure a one time mistake might not result in any noticeable problems, but over a prolonged use something must happen that MB doesn't like or they wouldn't have advised against it.
By the way, I'd be willing to bet that if you continued to use it in your car and something did happen your warranty would be voided and you would have to foot the bill.
By the way, I'd be willing to bet that if you continued to use it in your car and something did happen your warranty would be voided and you would have to foot the bill.
Last edited by chilledbenz; 07-08-2008 at 03:11 PM.
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 C300 4Matic
You are right on about the warranty. I have put nothing in it but premium with the exception of that blunder and will continue to do so but just curious that when in 5 years from now and gas is $345 a gallon, I may have to draw the line and say time to start using lower grade.
#4
You are right on about the warranty. I have put nothing in it but premium with the exception of that blunder and will continue to do so but just curious that when in 5 years from now and gas is $345 a gallon, I may have to draw the line and say time to start using lower grade.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SEATTLE WASHINGTON USA
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
'08 C300 Lux Barolo Red Beige Leather P2 MM 18" wheels '84 944
Which?
A month or so ago I filled up on ethanol in my C300. Only problem is I have a 4matic and it isn't supposed to run on ethanol. I guess the salesman was confused when he told me the car would run on ethanol because when i took it to the MB dealership they said my 4matic doesn't take ethanol. They ran some tests on it and found it wasn't causing any problems and they recommended just driving it out and filling back up with premium. Over the next few days I didn't notice anything different (other than the check engine light being on). No spark knocking. Nothing out of the ordinary. To top it all off the mileage seemed to be the same if not better than the premium I usually get. I haven't put any ethanol in it since then but i was wondering if anyone else has done the same? Obviously I have discovered that putting ethanol in my car doesn't screw it up so my next question would be do you think that the prolonged use of ethanol in the car would cause any harm? My father is an old school mechanic and he says you can put anything in a car and if it doesn't spark-knock then you can use it. Granted he's a ford/chevy guy. What kind of impact would it have on a benz?
Is this one of those deals where they say it doesn't support ethanol because tests didn't meet their benchmarks, expectations, and/or goals?
Is this one of those deals where they say it doesn't support ethanol because tests didn't meet their benchmarks, expectations, and/or goals?
The flex fuel engines use a lot of different parts (including the engine computer) and the fuel tanks are made of a different material to resist being eaten up by the ethanol.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2008 Mercedes C300 4Matic
Please be specific. Do you mean E85 or E10? Is your car a flex-fuel vehicle or not. My C300 Lux automatic is but I don't recall if the 4-matic is but it uses the same engine.
The flex fuel engines use a lot of different parts (including the engine computer) and the fuel tanks are made of a different material to resist being eaten up by the ethanol.
The flex fuel engines use a lot of different parts (including the engine computer) and the fuel tanks are made of a different material to resist being eaten up by the ethanol.
#7
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'14 GLK250 Diesel
Precisely.
I surely wouldn't take the long-term risk on any car that MB hasn't cleared for E85 use.
And the math on the premium vs regular question [which seems to come up every 5 minutes these days] is simply not compelling. The difference around here is less than 5%; your fuel use on regular would likely be about 2-2.5% higher, though that's hard to measure [a tenth of a mile per gallon?] - anyway, it just makes no sense at all to take any risks when the numbers involved are so puny. If you spent $1800 a year on fuel, the difference would somewhere in the neighborhood of $90.
If that kind of money is that important to you, without trying to offend, you're probably driving the wrong car.
Parenthetically, I just saw a post on one of the Edmunds boards from a VW owner who bought the 2.0 Turbo [Jetta Wolfsburg] thinking he could use regular in it, and is up in arms when he discovered it required premium because he wanted to "save money on gas, which is why he got the car in the first place" - someone tried to point out, as gently as possible, that the 2.5 5 cyl in the Jetta has approx the same mpg rating, and runs on regular, and is cheaper to buy, and never mind the gazillion other cars out there with better fuel consumption that run on regular. In my personal experience, which is pretty extensive, I don't think I've ever heard of a modern turbo-charged gasoline engine that didn't require at least 91 Octane [US measurement] - but the salesman allegedly told him otherwise [now there's a shock....].
I surely wouldn't take the long-term risk on any car that MB hasn't cleared for E85 use.
And the math on the premium vs regular question [which seems to come up every 5 minutes these days] is simply not compelling. The difference around here is less than 5%; your fuel use on regular would likely be about 2-2.5% higher, though that's hard to measure [a tenth of a mile per gallon?] - anyway, it just makes no sense at all to take any risks when the numbers involved are so puny. If you spent $1800 a year on fuel, the difference would somewhere in the neighborhood of $90.
If that kind of money is that important to you, without trying to offend, you're probably driving the wrong car.
Parenthetically, I just saw a post on one of the Edmunds boards from a VW owner who bought the 2.0 Turbo [Jetta Wolfsburg] thinking he could use regular in it, and is up in arms when he discovered it required premium because he wanted to "save money on gas, which is why he got the car in the first place" - someone tried to point out, as gently as possible, that the 2.5 5 cyl in the Jetta has approx the same mpg rating, and runs on regular, and is cheaper to buy, and never mind the gazillion other cars out there with better fuel consumption that run on regular. In my personal experience, which is pretty extensive, I don't think I've ever heard of a modern turbo-charged gasoline engine that didn't require at least 91 Octane [US measurement] - but the salesman allegedly told him otherwise [now there's a shock....].
Last edited by jrct9454; 07-08-2008 at 06:29 PM.
Trending Topics
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SEATTLE WASHINGTON USA
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
'08 C300 Lux Barolo Red Beige Leather P2 MM 18" wheels '84 944
E10
When you use the E10 version, fuel economy drops 10% immediately. Personal experience.
When switching a flex fuel vehicle to E85, the tank should be at 1/4 or less but not into reserve. The oxygen sensors then sense a lean mixture and fuel flow is increased to correct the mixture.
#11
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'14 GLK250 Diesel
In another of those govt interventions that always invokes the Law of Unintended Consequences, stations across the Columbia from us in Oregon are REQUIRED to sell all gasoline with 10% ethanol.
Here in Clark County [Vancouver WA], we too are mostly still getting gasoline without the alcohol, so there have been multiple news stories of drivers from Portland coming here [or stopping on their way home if they work here] to fill up with "real gasoline".
Because Oregon requires a "trained professional" [insert laughter here] to pump gasoline into your car, I do everything I can to avoid buying any fuel in Oregon, even though it's a few pennies cheaper than Washington. When we head south to visit friends and relatives in California, I top off the tank so I can get through Oregon entirely without having one of these station guys/gals getting anywhere near my car - thus, I haven't experienced "E10" much. Elsewhere in the West, it's a mixed bag - some brands are "ethanoled", some not.
I too have heard that our WA-refined fuel may soon contain the corn-mash....we'll see.
Here in Clark County [Vancouver WA], we too are mostly still getting gasoline without the alcohol, so there have been multiple news stories of drivers from Portland coming here [or stopping on their way home if they work here] to fill up with "real gasoline".
Because Oregon requires a "trained professional" [insert laughter here] to pump gasoline into your car, I do everything I can to avoid buying any fuel in Oregon, even though it's a few pennies cheaper than Washington. When we head south to visit friends and relatives in California, I top off the tank so I can get through Oregon entirely without having one of these station guys/gals getting anywhere near my car - thus, I haven't experienced "E10" much. Elsewhere in the West, it's a mixed bag - some brands are "ethanoled", some not.
I too have heard that our WA-refined fuel may soon contain the corn-mash....we'll see.
Last edited by jrct9454; 07-09-2008 at 10:03 AM.
#13
A month or so ago I filled up on ethanol in my C300. Only problem is I have a 4matic and it isn't supposed to run on ethanol. I guess the salesman was confused when he told me the car would run on ethanol because when i took it to the MB dealership they said my 4matic doesn't take ethanol. They ran some tests on it and found it wasn't causing any problems and they recommended just driving it out and filling back up with premium. Over the next few days I didn't notice anything different (other than the check engine light being on). No spark knocking. Nothing out of the ordinary. To top it all off the mileage seemed to be the same if not better than the premium I usually get. I haven't put any ethanol in it since then but i was wondering if anyone else has done the same? Obviously I have discovered that putting ethanol in my car doesn't screw it up so my next question would be do you think that the prolonged use of ethanol in the car would cause any harm? My father is an old school mechanic and he says you can put anything in a car and if it doesn't spark-knock then you can use it. Granted he's a ford/chevy guy. What kind of impact would it have on a benz?
Is this one of those deals where they say it doesn't support ethanol because tests didn't meet their benchmarks, expectations, and/or goals?
Is this one of those deals where they say it doesn't support ethanol because tests didn't meet their benchmarks, expectations, and/or goals?
My wife drives a Mini Cooper,S. Just a few weeks ago it wouldn't start. Battery had plenty of spark so I had it towed to the Dealer. Service told me it was the fuel pump and he has seen a few of them ( CooperS ) with the same problem. They are blaming it on Ethanol.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SEATTLE WASHINGTON USA
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
'08 C300 Lux Barolo Red Beige Leather P2 MM 18" wheels '84 944
By law?
Has this been mandated by the EPA or the State? In Washington State (about fifteen years ago) E10 became the rule because certain areas (defined by zipcode) did not meet EPA air quality standards in the winter but after about four years our air was clean enough that the EPA order was cancelled and we have not seen E10 since except in the stations that want the profit that E10 brings to them. ARCO is one of those companies and also no-name gas sold by some of the supermarkets such as Albertson's. My card-op station buys their gas and diesel from Exxon and I verify that from time to time.
#16
C300 4matic with E-85 HELLLPPPP
Today I filled up 3/4 of my tank with E-85. Hours later my check engine light turned on. I have a Mercedes c300 4matic 09. The manual says fill up with premium and e85 only I don't know what the problem is
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Despite what the OP claims, it is impossible to get the same MPG from E85 Flex Fuel as 89/91 Octane gasoline. Chemically, there is 20% less energy per gallon in E85 vs. gasoline, this due to the number of electron bonds that will be broken and oxidized in the combustion process. To see if E85 is more economical, multiply the price per gallon (or liter) by 1.25 and compare it to the gasoline price. Remember that 89 and 91 octane have the same energy content, the difference is the statistical number of shorter or longer carbon chains - the higher the octane rating, the closer it's antiknock characteristics are to pure 8-carbon-chain Octane.
Not all C300's are Flex Fuel capable, check the information inside the fuel filler lid door. For sure the C350 and the C300 with the 3.5L engine cannot use E85. Also, E85 causes degraded performance, as ethanol provides less power vs. gasoline with each ignition within the cylinder.
Not all C300's are Flex Fuel capable, check the information inside the fuel filler lid door. For sure the C350 and the C300 with the 3.5L engine cannot use E85. Also, E85 causes degraded performance, as ethanol provides less power vs. gasoline with each ignition within the cylinder.