Airbag problem in a car accident
I have 2008 C300 4matic now. After I read the article of an airbag problem, I begin to worry about my car because that accident may happen to me. New C class car accident happened in a highway in South Korea. Even if the car severely clashed at the front area due to a head on collision with another car, front airbags were not deployed at all. After the investigation from Mercedes Benz in Korea, they said that not working airbags in the accident is reasonable, and it will not make any problem with new C class in the future because the car got a damage on only an area which absorbs impact energy during the car clash and the frame for activating airbags did not break at all. The car driver was seriously injured due to the failure of the front airbags in the accident. I post the picture of the car and link for a video clip. What do you think about it?
http://news.naver.com/vod/vod.nhn?of...ection_id2=239
Last edited by SliverGray; Sep 16, 2008 at 02:46 PM.
the driver was severly injured.
its kinda scary to think that the bent steering is from the driver's head...
Are airbag deployment requirements different in Korea than in the USA? Do they vary world-wide?
What are the specific standards that the US government puts on how and when they deploy? For the car to be sold here, it must meet those standards.
What constitutes "severe" injuries? Is it a broken wrist, a broken leg, or serious back/neck injuries, or even a head injury?
Yes, cars are survivable, even when the accident looks bad. Saving the airbag while causing truly debilitating injury is not just wrong, designing it to work that way is illegal.
Are airbag deployment requirements different in Korea than in the USA? Do they vary world-wide?
What are the specific standards that the US government puts on how and when they deploy? For the car to be sold here, it must meet those standards.
What constitutes "severe" injuries? Is it a broken wrist, a broken leg, or serious back/neck injuries, or even a head injury?
Yes, cars are survivable, even when the accident looks bad. Saving the airbag while causing truly debilitating injury is not just wrong, designing it to work that way is illegal.
to follow korean.i saw the news from daum as well. yes, it's kinda scary to see that the airbag didn't deploy.
on the other hand, it makes sense tho. airbag shouldn't deploy on every single accident. i guess it's all down to how sensitive sensor should be.
Are airbag deployment requirements different in Korea than in the USA? Do they vary world-wide?
What are the specific standards that the US government puts on how and when they deploy? For the car to be sold here, it must meet those standards.
As we are learning, US regulations don't mean anything in the modern age with lack of enforcement by the agencies and the appointment of unqualified political cronies to senior positions.
I am certainly not placing any confidence in US regulatory agencies to protect me or my family these days.
Trending Topics
I am certainly not placing any confidence in US regulatory agencies to protect me or my family these days.
Anyway, don't get too alarmed over a press report - remember the runaway Audis ? CBS was particularly into it, and all sorts of reports then followed of "MY Audi just took off - I couldn't stop it" Turned out the original story was wrong. Press didn't bother to check the poor owner's original report, where she admitted that she hit the gas pedal by mistake.
Now we all get starting interlocks, for something that actually never happened.........hmmm......maybe your right about the regulators.

The Best of Mercedes & AMG
If this is indeed the situation, it makes me feel a tad bit better. I always wear the belt ;-)
If the belt is not latched, the airbag (s) will operate at a lower speed and g-force. If a belt is not latched, it's tensioner will not activate.
The impact sensors are in the front of the car and incorporate g-force sensors and since this Korean car's bags did not operate, Mercedes is going to have to explain it and if that has happened in the US, it would be a very big deal, probably ending up in court.
As a side note, I was recently in a car accident. The modern seatbelt actually had a little explosive inside that exploded during the impact to tighten the seatbelt in split second. I could smell the explosive from the seatbelt area right after the accident, and the mechanisim had to be replaced with a new one (since the explosive is only a one-time use.) My lesson learned is to always wear our seatbelt.
With best regards,
Last edited by axhoaxho; Sep 18, 2008 at 02:31 AM.
I was recently in a car accident, the seatbelt actually had a little explosive inside that exploded during the impact to tighten the seatbelt in split second. I could smell the explosive from the seatbelt area right after the accident, and the mechanisim had to be replaced with a new one (since the explosive is only a one-time use.) My lesson learned is to always wear our seatbelt.
With best regards,
If the belt is not latched, the airbag (s) will operate at a lower speed and g-force. If a belt is not latched, it's tensioner will not activate.
The impact sensors are in the front of the car and incorporate g-force sensors and since this Korean car's bags did not operate, Mercedes is going to have to explain it and if that has happened in the US, it would be a very big deal, probably ending up in court.
After taking to the BMW service , they explained the sensor in the seat belt of the driver side is out of order and hence the warning sign for the airbag and seat belt as they operate on same system. TThey had to replace it. It took them 1.5 months to do that as the part had to be ordered from Germany.
Hence the conclusion , Seat belts are connected with Air bag system.
After taking to the BMW service , they explained the sensor in the seat belt of the driver side is out of order and hence the warning sign for the airbag and seat belt as they operate on same system. TThey had to replace it. It took them 1.5 months to do that as the part had to be ordered from Germany.
Hence the conclusion , Seat belts are connected with Air bag system.
A presentation of “the anatomy of a crash” was put on that lasted about an hour. With the aid of a SL500 in the room the instructor went through the scenario of running off a corner (too much speed into the corner), hitting dirt and heading for, and hitting a tree.
He went through every safety system on the car and went to great lengths to explain the interaction between the sensor arrays in the front of the car, sensors in the seats to read the driver/passenger’s mass, the seatbelt pre-tensioning system and the airbag. The pre-tensioners and airbags are designed to work together i.e. no seatbelt, no airbag.
From memory, it went like this. Once the impact is detected and the car judges it to be “a biggie”, the pre-tension system, using an explosive charge, takes up all the slack in the seatbelt and pins you to the back of the seat. Once the car starts to rapidly decelerate, the airbag fires and the seatbelt tension comes off to “lower” you into a deflating airbag. The whole aim of the system is to reduce your body’s deceleration rate to minimise damage to yourself, mind you this all takes place in fractions of a second.
The additional fact revealed was that the driver was an old lady, mom of the guy who were pissed off.
I don't think that she did not wear a seatbelt but what I am suspecting that she DID NOT FASTEN TIGHTLY the belt by using a kind of nipper. Many drivers who are usually old generation, in Korea do not feel comfortable with the pressure of the seatbelt even if it is life-threatening. It is a bad habit.
Otherwise, Mercedes must do something for this instantly. It could happen to everybody driving a W204.



