C-Class (W204) 2008 - 2014: C180K, C200K, C230, C280, C300, C350, C200CDI, C220CDI, C320CDI

Quattro vs 4Matic?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-17-2008, 09:30 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
kleenex1234567's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
02 VW Jetta, 09 C230
Quattro vs 4Matic?

I was just wondering if MB's 4Matic system is as good or better than Audi's Quattro syatem?
Old 09-17-2008, 09:32 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
angeloxnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mississauga, ON CA
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
15 Mercedes C400, 12 Mercedes C250 coupe
i heard that audi's quattro is amazing in snow - audi driver
i heard that mb's 4matic is amazing in snow - mb driver

so........i guess "all-wheel" drive is just amazing in snow
Old 09-18-2008, 03:25 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
lx Raven xl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C180K 2011 COMAND, AMG, Dynamic Xenon, Business Pack, H&K Audio and +
Originally Posted by angeloxnet
i heard that audi's quattro is amazing in snow - audi driver
i heard that mb's 4matic is amazing in snow - mb driver

so........i guess "all-wheel" drive is just amazing in snow


Hahahahahahah..


Both cars are ok.
Old 09-18-2008, 08:15 AM
  #4  
Member
 
iolithblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: a place
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
my car
actually, there is some differences. get an informed opinion.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
4matic1.pdf (364.5 KB, 4054 views)
File Type: pdf
4matic 2.pdf (601.6 KB, 2882 views)
The following users liked this post:
Funkwagen (09-02-2017)
Old 09-18-2008, 08:52 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
angeloxnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mississauga, ON CA
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
15 Mercedes C400, 12 Mercedes C250 coupe
who wrote that article?
"Product Information for the Mercedes Benz Sales organization"

That is MB literature! don't get me wrong, i love MB but that article is a bit biased as it was prepared for MB
Old 09-18-2008, 09:21 AM
  #6  
Member
 
drevil2k2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: GTA North
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 BMW 335xi titanium silver.
My previous A4 1.8T was very solid in snow, fun to take corners and never got stuck on roads. Putting on snows of course further improved the grip and handling.

Summer time - a little boring and heavy.

Mind you, my quattro system was the older 50/50 and not the newer 60/40 power split.

Like all quattro and 4M owners, can't wait for it to snow
Old 09-18-2008, 09:42 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GDawgC220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,781
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
'05 A4 1.8TQM6
The major difference between the two is that Quattro is mechanically controlled and 4Matic is electronically controlled.

4Matic uses computers (4ETS) to detect wheel spin and apply the brakes to the appropriate wheel(s) when traction is lost which in turn directs power to the wheel(s) with grip to pull the car forward. If I remember right, it uses 4ETS traction system to act as a center diff then apply/remove power as needed depending on the axle that has spinning wheel(s). The new 4Matic system is 45/55 (F/R) power split.

Quattro relies on the mechanical diff to sense slippage (TorSen differential, torque sensing). It is a open differential so when power is equal to all 4 wheels so the gears aren't binded together. Once a wheel starts losing grip/traction, the gears bind together and send power to the other wheels. So it can sense when one or more wheels are losing torque/traction and divert power before the driver even knows or slippage is felt. There are no clutches or electronics that control the TorSen diff, purely mechanical. The 5th generation of Quattro is 40/60 (F/R) power split.
Old 09-18-2008, 10:12 AM
  #8  
Almost a Member!
 
epiphone3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 BMW 323i
Originally Posted by kleenex1234567
I was just wondering if MB's 4Matic system is as good or better than Audi's Quattro syatem?
The bigger question is which car attached to the AWD system is better? I'd have to kick my own *** if I ever bought an Audi so who cares what their AWD system is like.
Old 09-18-2008, 10:14 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GDawgC220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,781
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
'05 A4 1.8TQM6
Originally Posted by epiphone3
The bigger question is which car attached to the AWD system is better? I'd have to kick my own *** if I ever bought an Audi so who cares what their AWD system is like.
And what does this have to do with his question...
Old 09-18-2008, 02:35 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
451/443=EW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C350 4Matic
I owned a Saab 92X Aero, which is the same car as WRX. Me and a six Audi owners went to the mall and kicked it. All the cars were awsome and had no problem at all. My Saab-aru put on the funnest show but I dont really think it had anything to do with the car. Anyways all this being said, MB has its newest 4th gen 4Matic and for now I would have to say its gona be the MB. Honestly that is not really anything you should base a buying decision on because both cars will kick butt in the snow. But the MB in my opinion is better. Iv ordered the 4Matic and plan on doin some winter driving and my good buddy has a Audi Allroad so come winter i'll report back the two car proformances
Old 09-18-2008, 05:38 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
kevink2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
2004 Mazda6, 1993 RX7
Originally Posted by GDawgC220
The major difference between the two is that Quattro is mechanically controlled and 4Matic is electronically controlled.

4Matic uses computers (4ETS) to detect wheel spin and apply the brakes to the appropriate wheel(s) when traction is lost which in turn directs power to the wheel(s) with grip to pull the car forward. If I remember right, it uses 4ETS traction system to act as a center diff then apply/remove power as needed depending on the axle that has spinning wheel(s). The new 4Matic system is 45/55 (F/R) power split.

Quattro relies on the mechanical diff to sense slippage (TorSen differential, torque sensing). It is a open differential so when power is equal to all 4 wheels so the gears aren't binded together. Once a wheel starts losing grip/traction, the gears bind together and send power to the other wheels. So it can sense when one or more wheels are losing torque/traction and divert power before the driver even knows or slippage is felt. There are no clutches or electronics that control the TorSen diff, purely mechanical. The 5th generation of Quattro is 40/60 (F/R) power split.
Not Quite Right.

The best awd's use a center differential. That includes some Audis and the new MB 4matic, as the posted pdf's describe.

You are correct about audi's that don't have a transverse engine. The A4's, A6's etc, with fore-aft engine now use a revised torsen center diff with new internal gearing to give the 40/60 full time torque split, with lsd action as you described. The transvere engine Audis have a center clutch/coupling, that brings in rwd as needed. Audi now also calls these quattros too.

Early MB 4matics (pre ~2000) were electonic center couplings as you described. But the new ones have a mechanical center differential that provides full time awd with about 40/60 torque split (by way of planetary gears).

This link describes old and new, with a pic of the new set-up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4MATIC

One of the best surprises in our new C300 4matic is the 7 speed atx. With normal driving, in auto or manual mode, the slushy torque converter is locked up in every gear. It's just like a manual gearbox with electronic shifting. I think this was new for 08.
Old 09-18-2008, 10:44 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GDawgC220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,781
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
'05 A4 1.8TQM6
Originally Posted by kevink2
Not Quite Right.

The best awd's use a center differential. That includes some Audis and the new MB 4matic, as the posted pdf's describe.

You are correct about audi's that don't have a transverse engine. The A4's, A6's etc, with fore-aft engine now use a revised torsen center diff with new internal gearing to give the 40/60 full time torque split, with lsd action as you described. The transvere engine Audis have a center clutch/coupling, that brings in rwd as needed. Audi now also calls these quattros too.

Early MB 4matics (pre ~2000) were electonic center couplings as you described. But the new ones have a mechanical center differential that provides full time awd with about 40/60 torque split (by way of planetary gears).

This link describes old and new, with a pic of the new set-up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4MATIC

One of the best surprises in our new C300 4matic is the 7 speed atx. With normal driving, in auto or manual mode, the slushy torque converter is locked up in every gear. It's just like a manual gearbox with electronic shifting. I think this was new for 08.
Yes, you're correct. There are two versions of Quattro, Haldex and TorSen. Since the OP posted in the w204 section, TorSen is used in the A4 platform so I didn't mention the Haldex Quattro. Haldex is only used in the A3 and TT (traverse mounted engines as you mentioned), all other models use TorSen. Other manufacturers also use Haldex. Volvo and VW comes to mind. The new generation of Quattro, now in it's 5th iteration, is 40/60 split (began on the 2007 S4s and now across the line). The 4th generation (my A4 for example) is 50/50 split.
Old 09-19-2008, 03:52 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
emerged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 w204 c350 || 06 Audi a4 2.0T
I have a benz and Audi, personally driving my audi in canyons with awd tends to be better than my buddies 4 matic....

I tend to feel that audis awd is great, but I am no pro!
Old 09-19-2008, 04:02 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
451/443=EW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C350 4Matic
Originally Posted by emerged
I have a benz and Audi, personally driving my audi in canyons with awd tends to be better than my buddies 4 matic....

I tend to feel that audis awd is great, but I am no pro!
Keep in mind that Audi in general is a sportier car. So that may not have anything to do with the awd.
Old 09-01-2017, 02:41 PM
  #15  
Newbie
 
DanteMBofLB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 3
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C300
Quattro is 4MATIC

Originally Posted by kleenex1234567
I was just wondering if MB's 4Matic system is as good or better than Audi's Quattro syatem?
Look inside of an Audi owners manual. Quattro is 4MATIC. They disclaim it right in the books.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Quattro vs 4Matic?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:42 AM.