C-Class (W204) 2008 - 2014: C180K, C200K, C230, C280, C300, C350, C200CDI, C220CDI, C320CDI

Anybody running 255/40/17 on the back factory rims?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-31-2010, 12:07 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Pete7874's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'08 C300 4Matic Sport, '02 530i
Anybody running 255/40/17 on the back factory rims?

Currently got the factory staggered setup (225/45/17 front and 245/40/17 rear). When it's time to get new tires, I was thinking of using 255/40/17 on the rear - it is actually a closer match in overall diameter to the front. Anybody running this size? Any issues?
Old 11-01-2010, 12:43 PM
  #2  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Pete7874's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'08 C300 4Matic Sport, '02 530i
Anyone?
Old 11-01-2010, 01:16 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mr inkredibul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Midwest, US
Posts: 1,460
Received 70 Likes on 55 Posts
'17 GTR, '17 GLC43, '14 Panigale 899, '20 V4
I think your mph goes off the rear...whats your reason for switching?
Old 11-01-2010, 02:09 PM
  #4  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Pete7874's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'08 C300 4Matic Sport, '02 530i
Originally Posted by mr inkredibul
I think your mph goes off the rear...whats your reason for switching?
1. 255/40/17 is closer in overall diameter to 225/45/17
2. The wife keeps curbing the rear wheels, so slightly more rubber might give better protection against curb rash.
Old 11-01-2010, 02:23 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mr inkredibul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Midwest, US
Posts: 1,460
Received 70 Likes on 55 Posts
'17 GTR, '17 GLC43, '14 Panigale 899, '20 V4
Originally Posted by Pete7874
1. 255/40/17 is closer in overall diameter to 225/45/17
2. The wife keeps curbing the rear wheels, so slightly more rubber might give better protection against curb rash.
I'm confused with what the front diameter has to do with the rear diameter I thought the speedo is measured off the drive wheels. In this case the rear wheels. Your tires will be too small in the back.

If you dont mind the speedo being off a bit, then that works

Last edited by mr inkredibul; 11-01-2010 at 02:25 PM.
Old 11-01-2010, 02:33 PM
  #6  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Pete7874's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'08 C300 4Matic Sport, '02 530i
Originally Posted by mr inkredibul
I'm confused with what the front diameter has to do with the rear diameter I thought the speedo is measured off the drive wheels. In this case the rear wheels
I'm not worried about the speedo - the difference between 245/40 (OEM) and 255/40 is very small.

The reason I referenced front diameter is that I thought that when it comes to AWD, the wheel diameters (front and back) should be kept identical. Otherwise it puts additional strain on the differential, but I'm not really all that well versed on how modern day 4Matic works in that respect.

. Your tires will be too small in the back.
Too small? Just the opposite. The factory size is 245/40 and I plan on using 255/40.
Old 11-01-2010, 02:45 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mr inkredibul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Midwest, US
Posts: 1,460
Received 70 Likes on 55 Posts
'17 GTR, '17 GLC43, '14 Panigale 899, '20 V4
Originally Posted by Pete7874
I'm not worried about the speedo - the difference between 245/40 (OEM) and 255/40 is very small.

The reason I referenced front diameter is that I thought that when it comes to AWD, the wheel diameters (front and back) should be kept identical. Otherwise it puts additional strain on the differential, but I'm not really all that well versed on how modern day 4Matic works in that respect.


Too small? Just the opposite. The factory size is 245/40 and I plan on using 255/40.
sorry I mean big lol. And yeah I've heard that too about AWD something about Traction control not operating correctly... but the i thought your originals were staggered?
Old 11-01-2010, 03:23 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ohlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,171
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
300E a couple 1994 w124wagon E320 Wagon/,1971MGB Track/Rally, MG Midget Autocross ,2000 E320 wagon.
2/5th's of an inch

won't be any issue but I doubt it will prevent curb issues. They need to be taken up with the operator
Or look for those new types of tires with the rim protector feature.
Old 11-01-2010, 03:50 PM
  #9  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Pete7874's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'08 C300 4Matic Sport, '02 530i
Originally Posted by mr inkredibul
but the i thought your originals were staggered?
They are, and I plan to keep it that way. Fronts will remain 225/45, and rears will be 255/40.
Old 11-01-2010, 05:44 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Sentosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Peregian Beach, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 318
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C200 Estate Kompressor W204, 2018 GLA 220d
Originally Posted by Pete7874
They are, and I plan to keep it that way. Fronts will remain 225/45, and rears will be 255/40.
Pete. Not an expert but I don't see a problem. Your rears will be 10mm wider and only slightly higher but as somebody else said try to also get tires with rim protectors.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Anybody running 255/40/17 on the back factory rims?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 AM.