2012 Buick Regal GS




http://www.leftlanenews.com/buick-regal-gs.html
The only thing I am on the fence about is the rear styling. It kind of reminds me of a mazda 6, and doesn't complement the front of the vehicle very well...
EDIT: I see that they have actually ditched support for the 335hp turbo v-6 in the U.S. and are only offering that engine in Europe... The U.S. GS is maxed out at 255hp turbo 4 cyl which is 0-60 in less than 7 seconds... That is a huge disappointment for me. Couple that with the fact that they dropped AWD support in exchange for fwd, and they turned what is supposed to be a badass sporty car into a big *****. A car with that styling, those looks, and a sport rated version not even offered in a v6, let alone FWD only... Come on... Looks like I will pass on this vehicle. GM, I have no pity for you, I hope you flop just as hard, if not harder than the first time...
Last edited by jctevere; Nov 18, 2010 at 12:21 PM.




The only thing I am on the fence about is the rear styling. It kind of reminds me of a mazda 6, and doesn't complement the front of the vehicle very well...
EDIT: I see that they have actually ditched support for the 335hp turbo v-6 in the U.S. and are only offering that engine in Europe... The U.S. GS is maxed out at 255hp turbo 4 cyl which is 0-60 in less than 7 seconds... That is a huge disappointment for me. Couple that with the fact that they dropped AWD support in exchange for fwd, and they turned what is supposed to be a badass sporty car into a big *****. A car with that styling, those looks, and a sport rated version not even offered in a v6, let alone FWD only... Come on... Looks like I will pass on this vehicle. GM, I have no pity for you, I hope you flop just as hard, if not harder than the first time...
Last edited by C300Kid; Nov 18, 2010 at 09:40 PM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Compared to current Buicks, yes they are good, but that's from a dreadfully low baseline!
Cadillac tried it before with the Caterina - another Opel in drag!
Also the Buick version is much more upmarket than the stripper Opels used as fleet cars. This formula worked for it's main competitor, the Acura TSX, which is a run of the mill Accord in Europe and sold as a premium car here.
Still, who can argue. GM is famous for its brilliant marketing strategies, right?
Globally Buick has value, Pontiac didn't anymore.
Well I don't know. My '97 Grand Prix was, and still is, a pretty good car and I was never offered a Pontiac on the rental lot, and I rent quite often.
I doubt it, Euro rentals are surprisingly advanced. I rent there for a month or two every year, and they are very well equipped.
C300kid, this sounds like the sort of discussion that needs 2-3 pints of Guinness.
Cheers
Keith
My first car in high school was a 1982 Buick Regal, which I loved at the time, so had to take a look :o)
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/19/b...r-of-the-year/
I bet there is no one under 50 on their writing staff - and what qualifies them to make that conclusion as a priceguide publisher...???
The Buick Regal has come a long way, as I owned one before, a 1993 Regal Limited Coupe. It was sport tuned injected, 3.8 engine, and had quite a bit of pep. This 2012 model looks to be impressive, nice amenities.
However, no the Regal is not a German "high-end" saloon nor Japanese for comparison at the end of the day. It is a good substitute if you wish to have a lower priced, lower cost in upkeep daily driver. Another use is, this could be a daily driver in the stable while your MB (or other higher-up vehicle gets less miles on it.
To wrap it all up, the Buick Regal does not have the same level of torque, refinement, etc, in comparison with certain German or Japanese luxury cars, but it does fit nicely in with some of the lower models. It's not nearly as "farty" as being depicted here, but I don't see many folks in their 20's driving them.
Having said that, this can't really be uncompetitive with German saloons since it IS one..it's just not a luxury car. People do some simple research before you write something off as junk. Regarding the motor trend article..it is underpowered. For 2011 they only imported the base 4 cylinder..for the 2012MY they'll have the 255hp turbo which is what this car needs.
Anyway, no this car is not a C-Class or 3 Series but it's not intended to be..GM has Cadillac for that. It's aimed at the Acura TSX, Volvo S40, Volkswagen Passat, etc..and I think it's very competitive in that group.
Last edited by C300Kid; Nov 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM.
Instead it is meant to be an alternative to the passat, jetta, cc, acrua tsx, tl, or a maxima. This car beats every car in that segment, hands-down. Where I live I have never once seen a buick rental. I have seen tons of pontiacs, nissans, and fords and chevys.
If you want to compare GM's luxury divison (cadillac) to mercedes, bmw, and audi, then that is a very fair contest. To be honest, cadillac even wins out in a couple of matches. The cts-v is the fastest luxury sedan to date at a much cheaper price than nearly the entire competition. My Escalade truck is a marvelous vehicle, and I love just how refined everything feels.
The Regal is meant for people who need a daily driver, but don't want to pay an arm and a leg for a vehicle with good looks, sporty character, and good ride comfort. Not to mention that Buick has topped the J.D. Power Dependability charts for quite some time now.
Last edited by jctevere; Nov 19, 2010 at 12:25 PM.




