c300 4 matic vs GLK
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 1
2010 glk class 2010 c class
c300 4 matic vs GLK
I drive a 2010 c300 4 matic and the wife drives a GLK 350 4 matic.
The msrp on these 2 vehicles are within $120.00 of each other.
With the Glk she gets a larger engine, larger wheels, more steel,
Panaramic roof, and better interior. What am I not seeing with
the C300??
The msrp on these 2 vehicles are within $120.00 of each other.
With the Glk she gets a larger engine, larger wheels, more steel,
Panaramic roof, and better interior. What am I not seeing with
the C300??
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 57
From: Southwest USA
Another round of ICE
Much as it pains me to respond to someone who describes their spouse as a thing.....here's the answer. You are not missing anything looking at the C. You are just looking in the wrong place. The pricing for the C and the GLK are primarily based on positioning against their competitors and not against each other...C versus other upscale C segment sedans, and GLK against other small premium SUVs. The analysis is done with both base and typical content for each segment, so content variations between segments (car vs. SUV) are not determinative. Some consideration may be given to the showroom step, but the primary metrics for each brand manager will be his volume and share of his segment, therefore, the pricing target is more heavily weighted by what the direct competition is doing. A long history of data suggests that most buyers will cross consider comparable models (C vs. 3 vs. A4) and compare those prices, versus a minority who only cross shop within the MB showroom. But, even if that happens, the corporation is fine regardless of which model you find the better deal.
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 657
Likes: 119
From: Boston
2020 E63s Wagon, 2012 C63 AMG Coupe, 1989 560SL, 2023 911 Carrera T
they're different cars that serve different purposes. The c takes away some of what you see as pluses for other pluses you are disregarding.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 1
2010 glk class 2010 c class
What are the pluses I am disregarding. I am not trying to be a wise guy here,
I just believe Mercedes is making a whole lot more profit on the C's than on the GLK's.
Case in point, a base C350 starts $4500.00 higher than a Glk 350 4 matic. It's not
making sense to me.
I just believe Mercedes is making a whole lot more profit on the C's than on the GLK's.
Case in point, a base C350 starts $4500.00 higher than a Glk 350 4 matic. It's not
making sense to me.
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 657
Likes: 119
From: Boston
2020 E63s Wagon, 2012 C63 AMG Coupe, 1989 560SL, 2023 911 Carrera T
you're paying for the research that went into making such a performance sound sedan, you're paying for the much higher demand. there has always been a higher premium to pay on luxury sedans, and generally suvs always seem more practical and better value because they are much mer versatile. But i wouldnt go so far as to say mb is ripping you off, especially compared to an suv that is practically based off the same platform
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 1
2010 glk class 2010 c class
I'm not saying there ripping me off, just that they are making more profit on the C-class
A C-350 is built on the same platform. w/o 4 matic and smaller wheels, less steel.
$4500.00 more.I would think they put the same amount of research into building the GLK
class. After all is said and done however, I like both vehicles.
A C-350 is built on the same platform. w/o 4 matic and smaller wheels, less steel.
$4500.00 more.I would think they put the same amount of research into building the GLK
class. After all is said and done however, I like both vehicles.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 657
Likes: 119
From: Boston
2020 E63s Wagon, 2012 C63 AMG Coupe, 1989 560SL, 2023 911 Carrera T
I dont think they charge the same for r&d with the glk as oposed to the c class, with the w204 they are proud of the fact that they poured 7 years of work into it, whereas they dont mention it at all when marketing the x204, and as i said before in every market they sell many more c classes. Theres more to the cost of the car than steel and wheel sizes. the c350 is a compact executive "performance" sedan (i use the term performance lightly in this case) wheras the glk is a compact luxury crossover, which in general there is much less of a premium for. I think that extra 4 grand is going towards mostly the idea (and ability) of it being a sporty sedan whereas the glk is much more exclusively a family/utility car. thats my thought anyway. they are both great cars, i've reccomended my mother a glk for her next car.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 7
From: Dix Hills, New York
2012 C250 Coupe
The main reason why C-class price is higher is because of much greater demand, that is exactly why. Also, because they can, so why not?
However, I will say that between the incentives MB Corporate gives dealers, and dealers incentives to sell the car. I have found that comparably equipped C-class and GLK turn out to be the same price -- if not advantage to the C-class. At least for leases, maybe not so much for flat out purchases. My sister was looking to lease a c300 4matic with the same options as a GLK besides for motor, and C-class was 1,000 more, but the payment was nearly $100/month less, go figure...
However, I will say that between the incentives MB Corporate gives dealers, and dealers incentives to sell the car. I have found that comparably equipped C-class and GLK turn out to be the same price -- if not advantage to the C-class. At least for leases, maybe not so much for flat out purchases. My sister was looking to lease a c300 4matic with the same options as a GLK besides for motor, and C-class was 1,000 more, but the payment was nearly $100/month less, go figure...
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 57
From: Southwest USA
Another round of ICE
Most of the comments still miss the point. Price and cost are separate issues. And, base and typical content are determined by segment. Price is determined by the Pricing managers within the Finance group, based on a competitive analysis of comparable products, not how much research, steel, or other cost generators were used in the program. It is a completely different discipline than Program Management and Engineering's task to manage cost. If Audi, BMW, etc. raise their prices, and volumes hold, that means the market will bear more pricing, and the facing MB models will also move....watch.
And, perhaps, the original poster did not mean the implications of writing "the wife", but that's what I read.
And, perhaps, the original poster did not mean the implications of writing "the wife", but that's what I read.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 7
From: Dix Hills, New York
2012 C250 Coupe
Yeah, what sportstick said too applies. Also, because the GLK is so cut and dry, meaning only 1 engine choice, and 1 drivetrain, it is much cheaper to build. Once you add the option for a 3 liter 300 or a 6.3 c63, that adds to the cost of building the car. I am not sure if the glk comes in any other drivetrain besides automatic (but the c-class can get manual) and 4matic is an option on c-class and (i could be wrong on this) I believe 4matic is standard on glk?
All these choices and variances greatly increase the production cost. So that, associated with the fact that the demand is not nearly as high in that segment leads to a much lower apples to apples price figure.
I don't think he meant "the wife" as a bad thing, simply just an nickname or internet lingo. I guess it would have been more proper or courteous to instead just say my wife though...
All these choices and variances greatly increase the production cost. So that, associated with the fact that the demand is not nearly as high in that segment leads to a much lower apples to apples price figure.
I don't think he meant "the wife" as a bad thing, simply just an nickname or internet lingo. I guess it would have been more proper or courteous to instead just say my wife though...
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 40
Likes: 1
C250 4M Sport
I was planned to get a GLK, instead pick the C despite the GLK has better "value" (Price like a C250 but with 3.5L engine)
Major turn-off
1) too boxy
2) 20" wheels is standard in Canada (too much metal/not enough rubber)
Major turn-off
1) too boxy
2) 20" wheels is standard in Canada (too much metal/not enough rubber)
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: DC 'burbs
2016 C300 4Matic Lux w/ P1, P2, Lighting Package
Ditto ^^
Coming from a 2005 C and ready for a new Benz, I so wanted the GLK, but after multiple test drives and a good 40-mile run on back roads, highways and in the city, I couldn't stand it. Too boxy and clumsy. I wanted to feel the car hug the road. Bought a new C instead.
Coming from a 2005 C and ready for a new Benz, I so wanted the GLK, but after multiple test drives and a good 40-mile run on back roads, highways and in the city, I couldn't stand it. Too boxy and clumsy. I wanted to feel the car hug the road. Bought a new C instead.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 73
From: Midwest, US
'17 GTR, '17 GLC43, '14 Panigale 899, '20 V4
The boxiness is sexy and grew on me. At first I didn't like it. But modded it would look good!
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 285
Likes: 1
2008 C350 Sport
Sometimes when I see a GLK I love it and other times it just seems blah to me. I'd like to drive one someday since at some point I plan to get back into a crossover as my kids grow up and are into more activities, thus we'll need more room. I also like the all weather capability of a small crossover like the GLK. I've sat in several at my dealership and it's solid much like my C but nothing really excites me about it... It is less "sexy" than my C350, ha ha, maybe that is why they are cheaper...nothing really grabs your attention. I'd love to drive one since they're built on the C's platform, it must handle well for a crossover, right?
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 15
From: Boston and SWFlorida
2025 GLC300 white, 2023 Taycan RWD black
The sticker price is only one indicator of value. On a lease, the GLK is about $100 more per month. Mercedes seems to be offering much better lease incentives on the C300 sedan.
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
2014 GLK250 BlueTEC, 2012 BMW 335is Conv.
With these specific models, the C350 includes the Premium 1 package as standard while it is optional on the C300 and a not-the-same-but-sort-of-similar premium package is optional on the GLK350 as well. When you add the Premium package to the GLK350, that $4500 difference shrinks quickly.
I don't think he meant "the wife" as a bad thing, simply just an nickname or internet lingo. I guess it would have been more proper or courteous to instead just say my wife though...
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 1
2010 glk class 2010 c class
I've read everything said, and I still think Mercedes pricing is out of
whack here. Leasing prices make sense, with C 300 about 100.00
per month less than Glk, however, not everyone leases. To further
illustrate my point, check out BMW. The base 328 i with X drive
is $38,600 and the X3 with the larger 6 cylinder engine is $41,050.
They are also built on the same platform. I understand they are
different vehicles, taking suppply and demand into account. But
the bottom line is the Glk with the larger engine, larger wheels,
manufactured and shipped from the same place and is 500 lbs heavier
should have a higher MSRP than the c300, so either the c300 is too
high or the Glk 350 is too low or a combination of both.
Thank you all for you comments
whack here. Leasing prices make sense, with C 300 about 100.00
per month less than Glk, however, not everyone leases. To further
illustrate my point, check out BMW. The base 328 i with X drive
is $38,600 and the X3 with the larger 6 cylinder engine is $41,050.
They are also built on the same platform. I understand they are
different vehicles, taking suppply and demand into account. But
the bottom line is the Glk with the larger engine, larger wheels,
manufactured and shipped from the same place and is 500 lbs heavier
should have a higher MSRP than the c300, so either the c300 is too
high or the Glk 350 is too low or a combination of both.
Thank you all for you comments
Newbie
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Harvest, AL
2009 C350
It's all about the market. Pricing is based on market, not cost to produce the product. If the market will pay higher costs while allowing a company to still meet their sales goals, that's how the prices will be set. The GLK is in a stiff market compared to the C300. When we bought my wife's Q5, just about everyone was killing the GLK on price\value. The base prices were close, but when you optioned the GLK out to match the Audi, Volvo, or Lexus, the Mercedes was at least 5k more.
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 214
Likes: 8
From: Lake Tahoe
2017 C43 AMG
I have a story....
While waiting for my 2011 C300 4matic, the dealership gave a me a brand new GLK350.
This thing started to grow on me and I almost changed my order. UNTIL...
It snowed in tahoe. This GLK got stuck in the driveway with no incline or decline and barely any snow. I was almost ready to go back to AUDI, until the lent me a fairly new C300 4matic, similar to the one I was buying...This thing killed it and never got stuck.
They could not explain why the 4matic was so pathetic, but I laugh everytime I pass one on the road in tahoe.
While waiting for my 2011 C300 4matic, the dealership gave a me a brand new GLK350.
This thing started to grow on me and I almost changed my order. UNTIL...
It snowed in tahoe. This GLK got stuck in the driveway with no incline or decline and barely any snow. I was almost ready to go back to AUDI, until the lent me a fairly new C300 4matic, similar to the one I was buying...This thing killed it and never got stuck.
They could not explain why the 4matic was so pathetic, but I laugh everytime I pass one on the road in tahoe.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 57
From: Southwest USA
Another round of ICE
I have a story....
While waiting for my 2011 C300 4matic, the dealership gave a me a brand new GLK350.
This thing started to grow on me and I almost changed my order. UNTIL...
It snowed in tahoe. This GLK got stuck in the driveway with no incline or decline and barely any snow. I was almost ready to go back to AUDI, until the lent me a fairly new C300 4matic, similar to the one I was buying...This thing killed it and never got stuck.
They could not explain why the 4matic was so pathetic, but I laugh everytime I pass one on the road in tahoe.
While waiting for my 2011 C300 4matic, the dealership gave a me a brand new GLK350.
This thing started to grow on me and I almost changed my order. UNTIL...
It snowed in tahoe. This GLK got stuck in the driveway with no incline or decline and barely any snow. I was almost ready to go back to AUDI, until the lent me a fairly new C300 4matic, similar to the one I was buying...This thing killed it and never got stuck.
They could not explain why the 4matic was so pathetic, but I laugh everytime I pass one on the road in tahoe.
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 171
Likes: 1
2008 C350
Personally 
I plan on buying my wife a GLK next year. (Shh! It's a surprise!)
Mostly I care about her being in a safe car, and no question, the GLK is priced VERY VERY competitively. She has always remarked that she likes the GLK and I like the option of a LITTLE room to move bigger things -- more than i get in my w204.
I do agree that it seems obvious that MB is making more profit on the C350. Meh, so be it. Sportstick nailed it. I don't feel ripped-off because those 2 cars are not in competition w/ one another. Now, if the 335i was $4k cheaper than the C350 (and somehow I noticed that after i bought), then I'd feel ripped-off.
I plan on buying my wife a GLK next year. (Shh! It's a surprise!)Mostly I care about her being in a safe car, and no question, the GLK is priced VERY VERY competitively. She has always remarked that she likes the GLK and I like the option of a LITTLE room to move bigger things -- more than i get in my w204.
I do agree that it seems obvious that MB is making more profit on the C350. Meh, so be it. Sportstick nailed it. I don't feel ripped-off because those 2 cars are not in competition w/ one another. Now, if the 335i was $4k cheaper than the C350 (and somehow I noticed that after i bought), then I'd feel ripped-off.
