BMW's 0- 62 in 4.7 Seconds, 546 lb/ft Torque, 381 BHP, 37 MPG.
For the trip diesel, if it's got a better torque curve than a heavier, larger displacement engine with single turbo, and it's not a big increase for base cost and maintenance costs, it's a winner.
.
Trending Topics
Compare times with other MB's :-
http://www.zeroto60times.com/Mercede...mph-Times.html
Achieving 4.7 with small cubes & a great consumption figure & nil lag , this little engine is a winner.

Think diesel man
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
But it is a good idea. I just think that speaking in overal terms. It would have been smarter to get a v6 biturbo to do the same thing. And when a v8 NA (best reliability vs TRI-turbo) can have the same performance with 25mpg hwy. I'll take that. Heck, you can probably make the M56 or a similar car a hybrid and blow those numbers out of the water, especially if you introduce 1/2 cylinder turnoff (to run on 4 cylinders) when cruising highway speed.
Compare times with other MB's :-
http://www.zeroto60times.com/Mercede...mph-Times.html
Achieving 4.7 with small cubes & a great consumption figure & nil lag , this little engine is a winner.

Think diesel man

Rx7 Sequential Twin Turbo Contol System

---------------------------------------------------------
Obama Fans, please don't read this !!!
Mr Obama will likely enjoys 4 more years to make fuel nearly twice as expensive, based on over-regulating the gulf oil drilling when only one company had a history of rule violations and was the only one responsible for the disaster, and promoting non-profitable "green energy" companies for his buddies, while china and many of the eastern countries belch out pollution. He also stopped the big pipeline from Canada, because is was not smart enough to interpret the current studies, and just tossed his union buds (who will vote for him anyways) under the bus, while saving his green alien fans ...
.
Last edited by kevink2; Jan 29, 2012 at 05:04 PM.







